Advertisement

20 Years of UPPAAL Enabled Industrial Model-Based Validation and Beyond

  • Kim G. LarsenEmail author
  • Florian Lorber
  • Brian Nielsen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11247)

Abstract

In this paper we review how the Uppaal Tool Suite served in industrial projects and was both driven and improved by them throughout the last 20 years. We show how the need of industry for model-based validation, performance evaluation and synthesis shaped the tool suite and how the tool suite aided the use cases it was applied in. The paper highlights a number of selected cases, including success stories and pitfalls, and we discuss the important roles of both basic research and industrial projects.

References

  1. 1.
    Mikucionis, M., Larsen, K.G., Nielsen, B.: T-UPPAAL: online model-based testing of real-time systems. In: Grunbacher, P. (ed.) 19th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2004) Proceedings, United States, pp. 396–397. IEEE Computer Society Press (2004). ISSN 1068–3062Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asaadi, H.R., Khosravi, R., Mousavi, M.R., Noroozi, N.: Towards model-based testing of electronic funds transfer systems. In: Arbab, F., Sirjani, M. (eds.) FSEN 2011. LNCS, vol. 7141, pp. 253–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29320-7_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Behrmann, G., Cougnard, A., David, A., Fleury, E., Larsen, K.G., Lime, D.: UPPAAL-Tiga: time for playing games!. In: Damm, W., Hermanns, H. (eds.) CAV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4590, pp. 121–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73368-3_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Behrmann, G., et al.: UPPAAL 4.0. In: 2006 Third International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems. QEST 2006, pp. 125–126. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bengtsson, J., et al.: Verification of an audio protocol with bus collision using Uppaal. In: Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A. (eds.) CAV 1996. LNCS, vol. 1102, pp. 244–256. Springer, Heidelberg (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61474-5_73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bisgaard, M., Gerhardt, D., Hermanns, H., Krčál, J., Nies, G., Stenger, M.: Battery-aware scheduling in low orbit: the GomX–3 case. In: Fitzgerald, J., Heitmeyer, C., Gnesi, S., Philippou, A. (eds.) FM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9995, pp. 559–576. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48989-6_34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bosscher, D., Polak, I., Vaandrager, F.: Verification of an audio control protocol. In: Langmaack, H., de Roever, W.-P., Vytopil, J. (eds.) FTRTFT 1994. LNCS, vol. 863, pp. 170–192. Springer, Heidelberg (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58468-4_165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cassez, F., David, A., Fleury, E., Larsen, K.G., Lime, D.: Efficient on-the-fly algorithms for the analysis of timed games. In: Abadi, M., de Alfaro, L. (eds.) CONCUR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3653, pp. 66–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11539452_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cassez, F., David, A., Larsen, K.G., Lime, D., Raskin, J.-F.: Timed control with observation based and stuttering invariant strategies. In: Namjoshi, K.S., Yoneda, T., Higashino, T., Okamura, Y. (eds.) ATVA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4762, pp. 192–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75596-8_15CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D’Argenio, P.R., Katoen, J.-P., Ruys, T.C., Tretmans, J.: The bounded retransmission protocol must be on time!. In: Brinksma, E. (ed.) TACAS 1997. LNCS, vol. 1217, pp. 416–431. Springer, Heidelberg (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0035403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    David, A., et al.: On time with minimal expected cost! In: Cassez, F., Raskin, J.-F. (eds.) ATVA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8837, pp. 129–145. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11936-6_10Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    David, A., Jensen, P.G., Larsen, K.G., Mikučionis, M., Taankvist, J.H.: Uppaal Stratego. In: Baier, C., Tinelli, C. (eds.) TACAS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9035, pp. 206–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46681-0_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Mikucionis, M.: Schedulability of Herschel revisited using statistical model checking. STTT 17(2), 187–199 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Mikucionis, M., Poulsen, D.B.: Uppaal SMC tutorial. STTT 17(4), 397–415 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    David, A., et al.: Statistical model checking for networks of priced timed automata. In: Fahrenberg, U., Tripakis, S. (eds.) FORMATS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6919, pp. 80–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24310-3_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Mikučionis, M., Wang, Z.: Time for statistical model checking of real-time systems. In: Gopalakrishnan, G., Qadeer, S. (eds.) CAV 2011. LNCS, vol. 6806, pp. 349–355. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22110-1_27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Nyman, U., Traonouez, L., Wasowski, A.: Real-time specifications. STTT 17(1), 17–45 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Nyman, U., Wąsowski, A.: ECDAR: an environment for compositional design and analysis of real time systems. In: Bouajjani, A., Chin, W.-N. (eds.) ATVA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6252, pp. 365–370. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15643-4_29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    David, A., Larsen, K.G., Legay, A., Nyman, U., Wasowski, A.: Timed I/O automata: a complete specification theory for real-time systems. In: Johansson, K.H., Yi, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control. HSCC 2010, 12–15 April 2010, pp. 91–100. ACM, Stockholm (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Vries, R.G., Tretmans, J.: On-the-fly conformance testing using SPIN. STTT 2(4), 382–393 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    A.B. Eriksen, et al.: Uppaal stratego for intelligent traffic lights. In: ITS European Congress (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gerke, M., Ehlers, R., Finkbeiner, B., Peter, H.-J.: Model checking the FlexRay physical layer protocol. In: Kowalewski, S., Roveri, M. (eds.) FMICS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6371, pp. 132–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15898-8_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Havelund, K., Larsen, K.G., Skou, A.: Formal verification of a power controller using the real-time model checker Uppaal. In: Katoen, J.-P. (ed.) ARTS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1601, pp. 277–298. Springer, Heidelberg (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48778-6_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Havelund, K., Skou, A., Larsen, K.G., Lund, K.: Formal modeling and analysis of an audio/video protocol: an industrial case study using UPPAAL. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS 1997), 3–5 December 1997, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 2–13. IEEE Computer Society (1997)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hessel, A., Larsen, K.G., Nielsen, B., Pettersson, P., Skou, A.: Time-optimal test cases for real-time systems. In: Larsen, K.G., Niebert, P. (eds.) FORMATS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2791, pp. 234–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-40903-8_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim, J.H., Larsen, K.G., Nielsen, B., Mikučionis, M., Olsen, P.: Formal analysis and testing of real-time automotive systems using uppaal tools. In: Núñez, M., Güdemann, M. (eds.) Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems. pp, pp. 47–61. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim, F.L., Larsen, G., Nielsen, B.: 20 years of real real time model validation (2018, under submission)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Larsen, K., et al.: As cheap as possible: effcient cost-optimal reachability for priced timed automata. In: Berry, G., Comon, H., Finkel, A. (eds.) CAV 2001. LNCS, vol. 2102, pp. 493–505. Springer, Heidelberg (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44585-4_47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Larsen, K.G., Mikučionis, M., Muñiz, M., Srba, J., Taankvist, J.H.: Online and compositional learning of controllers with application to floor heating. In: Chechik, M., Raskin, J.-F. (eds.) TACAS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9636, pp. 244–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49674-9_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Larsen, K.G., Mikucionis, M., Nielsen, B.: Online testing of real-time systems using Uppaal. In: Grabowski, J., Nielsen, B. (eds.) FATES 2004. LNCS, vol. 3395, pp. 79–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31848-4_6CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Larsen, K.G., Mikucionis, M., Nielsen, B., Skou, A.: Testing real-time embedded software using UPPAAL-TRON: an industrial case study. In: Wolf, W.H. (ed.) 5th ACM International Conference On Embedded Software, Proceedings. EMSOFT 2005, 18–22 September 2005, Jersey City, NJ, USA, pp. 299–306. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Larsen, K.G., Pettersson, P., Yi, W.: UPPAAL in a nutshell. STTT 1(1–2), 134–152 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lindahl, M., Pettersson, P., Yi, W.: Formal design and analysis of a gear controller. STTT 3(3), 353–368 (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mikucionis, M., Larsen, K.G., Nielsen, B.: T-UPPAAL: online model-based testing of real-time systems. In: 19th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2004), 20–25 September 2004, Linz, Austria, pp. 396–397. IEEE Computer Society (2004)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mikučionis, M., et al.: Schedulability analysis using Uppaal: Herschel-Planck case study. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6416, pp. 175–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16561-0_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nielsen, B.: Specification and test of real-time systems. Ph.D. thesis, Aalborg University (2000)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nielsen, B., Skou, A.: Automated test generation from timed automata. In: Margaria, T., Yi, W. (eds.) TACAS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2031, pp. 343–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45319-9_24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nielsen, B., Skou, A.: Test generation for time critical systems: tool and case study. In: 13th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems, Delft, June 2001, The Netherlands, pp. 155–162 (2001)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Romijn, J.: A timed verification of the IEEE 1394 leader election protocol. Formal Methods Syst. Des. 19(2), 165–194 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rütz, C.: Timed model-based conformance testing - a case study using tron: testing key states of automated trust anchor updating (RFC 5011) in autotrust. B.Sc. thesis (2010)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tretmans, J.: A formal approach to conformance testing, C-19, pp. 257–276 (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations