Advertisement

Connectivity Patterns for Supporting BPM in Healthcare

  • Amos Harris
  • Craig Kuziemsky
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 887)

Abstract

Health information technology frequently leads to unintended consequences (UICs) post implementation. We believe a key cause of UICs are various HIT mediated connections between people and processes. To better manage UICs we first need to understand the nature of these connections. Business Process Management (BPM) approaches can help support HIT design but to date there are no methods focused on identifying patterns of HIT connectivity. This poster describes our three stage method to identify and model HIT connectivity patterns and then map the patterns to existing BPM workflow patterns. We use our method to analyze a case study of a perioperative information system to provide preliminary examples of individual and collaborative connectivity patterns.

Keywords

Connectivity Health information technology Patterns Business process management 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge funding support from a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

References

  1. 1.
    Karsh, B.T., Weinger, M.B., Abbott, P.A., Wears, R.L.: Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 17, 617–623 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuziemsky, C.E., Borycki, E.M., Kushniruk, A.W.: Studying the HIT-complexity interchange. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 225, 38–42 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuziemsky, C.E., Randall, R., Borycki, E.M.: Understanding unintended consequences and health information technology: contribution from the IMIA Organizational and Social Issues Working Group. Yearb. Med. Inform. 10(1), 53–60 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mendling, J.: Foundations of business process modeling. In: Management Association (ed.), Business Information Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications, Hershey, PA, pp. 6–41 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grando, M.A., Peleg, M., Cuggia, M., Glasspool, D.: Patterns for collaborative work in health care teams. Artif. Intell. Med. 53, 139–160 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Russell, N., Barros, A.: Business processes in connected communities. In: Fournier, F., Mendling, J. (eds.) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 202. Springer, Cham (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Su, X., Khoshgoftaar, T.M.: A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Adv. Artif. Intell. (2009). Article No. 4Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, S., Karatzoglou, A., Gentile, C.: Collaborative filtering bandits. In: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2016), pp. 539–548. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Russell, N., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Workflow Patterns: The Definitive Guide. MIT Press, Cambridge (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hseih, H.F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Telfer School of ManagementUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations