Advertisement

Multiple Publications: The Main Reason for the Retraction of Papers in Computer Science

  • Mymoona Dawood Abdulmalek Al-Hidabi
  • Phoey Lee Teh
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 886)

Abstract

This paper intends to review the reasons for the retraction over the last decade. The paper particularly aims at reviewing these reasons with reference to computer science field to assist authors in comprehending the style of writing. To do that, a total of 36 retracted papers found on the Web of Science within Jan 2007 through July 2017 are explored. Given the retraction notices which are based on 10 common reasons, this paper classifies the two main categories, namely, random and non-random retraction. Retraction due to the duplication of publications scored the highest proportion of all other reasons reviewed.

Keywords

Reasons on retraction Random and non-random Retracted papers Retraction notice Clustering Classification duplication 

References

  1. 1.
    Steen, R.G.: Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? J. Med. Ethics 37(4), 249–253 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wager, E., Williams, P.: Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008. J. Med. Ethics 37(9), 567–570 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fang, F.C., Steen, R.G., Cadadevall, A.: Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109(42), 17028–17033 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grieneisen, M.L., Zhang, M.: A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLoS ONE 7(10), e44118 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, M., Grieneisen, M.L.: The impact of misconduct on the published medical and non-medical literature, and the news media. Scientometrics 96(2), 573–587 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fanelli, D.: Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PLoS Med. 10(12), 1–6 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carafoli, E.: Scientific misconduct: the dark side of science. Rend. Lincei 26, 369–382 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosenkrantz, A.B.: Retracted publications within radiology journals. Am. J. Roentgenol. 206(2), 231–235 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mongeon, P., Lariviere, V.: Costly collaborations: the impact of scientific fraud on co-authors’ careers. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67(3), 535–542 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lu, S.F., Jin, G.Z., Uzzi, B., Jones, B.: The retraction penalty: evidence from the web of science. Sci. Rep. 3, 3146 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marcovitch, H.: Misconduct by researchers and authors. Gac. Sanit. 21(6), 492–499 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nambiar, R., Tilak, P., Cerejo, C.: Quality of author guidelines of journals in the biomedical and physical sciences. Assoc. Learn. Prof. Soc. 27(3), 201–206 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steen, R.G.: Misinformation in the medical literature: what role do error and fraud play? J. Med. Ethics 37, 498–503 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qi, X., Deng, H., Guo, X.: Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview. Postgrad. Med. J. 93(1102), 499 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    He, T.: Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010. Scientometrics 96(2), 555–561 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murugesan, R.: What Happens When Ethical Violations are Detected in Research? 13 December 2014Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bilbrey, E., O’Dell, N., Creamer, J.: A novel rubric for rating the quality of retraction notices. Publications 2(1), 14–26 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wager, E., Barbour, V., Yentis, S., Kleinert, S.: Retractions: guidance from the committee on publication ethics (COPE). Maturitas 64(4), 201–203 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yan, J., MacDonald, A., Baisi, L.-P., Evaniew, N., Bhandari, M., Ghert, M.: Retractions in orthopaedic research - a systematic review. Bone Joint Res. 5(6), 263–268 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hesselmann, F., Graf, V., Schmidt, M., Reinhart, M.: The visibility of scientific misconduct: a review of the literature on retracted journal articles. Curr. Sociol. 1–32 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stretton, S., et al.: Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 28(10), 1575–1583 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Trikalinos, N.A., Evangelou, E., Ioannidis, J.P.A.: Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 61(5), 464–470 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parrish, D., Noonan, B.: Image manipulation as research misconduct. Sci. Eng. Ethics 15(2), 161–167 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steen, R.G.: Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? J. Med. Ethics 37(2), 113–117 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roig, M.: Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: a guide to ethical writing, pp. 1–71 (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Redman, B.K., Yarandi, H.N., Merz, J.F.: Empirical developments in retraction. J. Med. Ethics 34(11), 807–809 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hosseini, M., Hilhorst, M., de Beaufort, I., Fanelli, D.: Doing the right thing: a qualitative investigation of retractions due to unintentional error. Sci. Eng. Ethics, no. office 321 (2017)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wager, E.: Ethical publishing: the innocent author’s guide to avoiding misconduct. Menopause Int. 13(3), 98–102 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Benson, P.J.: Seven sins in publishing (but who’s counting…). Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 98(1), 1–5 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bohannon, J.: Who’s afraid of peer review? Science 342(6154), 60–65 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schulzrinne, H.: Double submissions - publishing misconduct or just effective dissemination? ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 39(3), 40–42 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Khajuria, A., Agha, R.: Fraud in scientific research - birth of the concordat to uphold research integrity in the United Kingdom. J. R. Soc. Med. 107(2), 61–65 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li, Y.: Text-based plagiarism in scientific publishing: issues, developments and education. Sci. Eng. Ethics 19(3), 1241–1254 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moylan, E.C., Kowalczuk, M.K.: Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central. Br. Med. J. Publ. Gr. 6(11), e012047 (2016)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mohan, M., Shetty, D., Shetty, T., Pandya, K.: Rising from plagiarising. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 14(3), 538–540 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Retraction Watch: Can a tracking system for peer reviewers help stop fakes? (2017). http://retractionwatch.com/2017/06/23/can-tracking-system-peer-reviewers-help-stop-fakes/
  37. 37.
    Castillo, M.: The fraud and retraction epidemic. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 35(9), 1653–1654 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Andreescu, L.: Self-plagiarism in academic publishing: the anatomy of a misnomer. Sci. Eng. Ethics 19(3), 775–797 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shah, N.: Ethical issues in biomedical research and publication. J. Conserv. Dent. 14(3), 205–208 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wager, E.: Publication ethics: whose problem is it? Insights 25(3), 294–299 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mandal, M., Bagchi, D., Basu, S.R.: Scientific misconducts and authorship conflicts: Indian perspective. Indian J. Anaesth. 59(7), 400–405 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Markowitz, D.M., Hancock, J.T.: Linguistic Obfuscation in Fraudulent Science. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 35(4), 435–445 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mymoona Dawood Abdulmalek Al-Hidabi
    • 1
  • Phoey Lee Teh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computing and Information SystemsSunway UniversityBandar SunwayMalaysia

Personalised recommendations