Advertisement

Towards a European Geography of Future Perspectives: A Story of Urban Concentration

  • Kai BöhmeEmail author
  • Christian Lüer
  • Maria Toptsidou
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Urban areas and the diversity of urban areas across Europe are a corner stone of territorial cohesion. At the same time, territorial cohesion in Europe is challenged by the dominant role of urban areas in territorial development and in territorial development policies. One may conclude that the urban perspective and territorial cohesion cannot do without each other, but at the same time, they risk to wreck each other. This contribution will further explore this complicated relation. Starting with the growing importance of urban areas, the first section will address the increasing concentration of economic and demographic growth in Europe to urban areas (Böhme and Lüer 2017; ESPON 2017, 2018). Based on the idea that cities act as motors for territorial development in a wider region, over the past decades they have become the centre points for development and future perspectives. The impact this had on territorial cohesion can be discussed at least at two different levels: (a) European and (b) functional urban/regional level.

Keywords

Urban development Urban diversity Functional urban areas Territorial development Territorial cohesion Fragmentation Europe Concentration Future Foresight Future perspectives 

References

  1. Bain & Company (2016) Spatial economics: the declining cost of distance. The next big economic shift will reshape industries, social patterns and the global economy. Bain & Company, New York and DallasGoogle Scholar
  2. Barca F, McCann P, Rodríguez-Pose A (2012) The case for regional development intervention: place-based versus place-neutral approaches. J Reg Sci 52(1):134–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burmeister K, Fink A, Schulz-Montag B, Steinmüller K (2018) Deutschland neu denken: acht Szenarien für unsere Zukunft. Oekom Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  4. Böhme K, Lüer C (2016) Europe’s territorial futures between daydreams and nightmares. In: Europa XXI. Territorial uncertainty as a challenge for regional policy in Europe, vol 30. pp 5–22Google Scholar
  5. Böhme K, Lüer C (2017) Assessing territorial impacts of future trends. In: Medeiros E (ed) Uncovering the territorial dimension of European Union Cohesion Policy. Routledge, Abingdon & Oxon, pp 161–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Böhme K, Toptsidou M (2017) The future of Europe and its territories. Spatial Foresight Brief No. 2017:7. Spatial Foresight, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  7. Böhme K, Doucet P, Komornicki T, Zaucha J. Świątek D (2011) How to strengthen the territorial dimension of ‘Europe 2020’ and EU Cohesion Policy. Report prepared at the request of the Polish EU Presidency, Polish Ministry of Regional Development, Warsaw. Retrieved from http://www.spatialforesight.eu/tl_files/files/editors/dokumente/Report_Final_110913.pdf
  8. Böhme K, Antikainen J, Zillmer S, Hans S, Pyykkonen S (2016) Looking towards 2030: preparing the Baltic Sea Region for the future. Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth (Tillväxtverket), Stockholm. Retrieved from http://www.strategyforum2016.eu/media/reports/looking-towards-2030-report-33885447
  9. Dijkstra L, Garcilazo E, McCann P (2013) The economic performance of European cities and city regions: myths and realities. Eur Plan Stud 21(3):334–354.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.716245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ESPON (2005) ESPON 1.1.1 potentials for polycentric development in Europe. Project report. August 2004. Revised version—March 2005, ESPON, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  11. ESPON (2007) ESPON project 1.4.3 study on urban functions. Final Report. March 2007. ESPON, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  12. ESPON (2013) Territorial dynamics in Europe: gateway functions in cities. ESPON, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  13. ESPON (2014a) Territorial dynamics in Europe: evidence for a European urban agenda. ESPON, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  14. ESPON (2014b) TOWN small and medium sized towns in their functional territorial context. Applied research 23 Jan 2013. Final Report. Version 30 Aug 2014. ESPON, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  15. ESPON (2017) European territorial review. Territorial cooperation for the future of Europe, ESPON, Luxembourg. Retrieved from https://territorial-review.espon.eu/
  16. ESPON (2018) Possible European territorial futures. ESPON, Luxembourg. Retrieved from https://www.espon.eu/territorial-futures
  17. European Commission (ed) (2007) Leipzig charter on sustainable European cities. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/themes/urban/leipzig_charter.pdf
  18. European Commission and UN-HABITAT (2016) The state of European Cities 2016. In: Cities leading the way to a better future. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  19. European Strategy and Policy Analysis System (2015) Global trends to 2030: can the EU meet the challenges ahead? European strategy and policy analysis systemGoogle Scholar
  20. Eurostat (2016) Urban Europe. Statistics on cities, towns and suburbs. Office for Official Publications of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  21. Glenn JC, Florescu E, The Millennium Project Team (2015) 2015–16 state of the future. The Millennium Project, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodhart D (2017) The road to somewhere: the populist revolt and the future of politics. Hurst & Company, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Lange S (2018) Smarte grüne welt? Digitalisierung zwischen Überwachung, Konsum und Nachhaltigkeit. Oekom Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  24. Latvian Presidency of the Council of the European Union (2015) Declaration of Ministers towards the EU Urban Agenda. In: Informal meeting of EU ministers responsible for territorial cohesion and urban matters, Riga, 10 June 2015Google Scholar
  25. Leunig T (2008) The regeneration game is up. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/aug/13/regeneration.conservatives
  26. Lüer C, Holstein F (2016) Functional integration as a tool for urban areas to deliver territorial cohesion. In: EUROCITIES, making cities. Visions for an urban future. pp 74–83Google Scholar
  27. Lüer C, Böhme K, Jæger S, Hans S, Madeira N, Holstein F, Toptsidou M, Tulumello S, Bina O, Ferrão J (2015) Report on territorial impact projections. Final deliverable (D7.2) of work package 7 on Territorial Governance, FLAGSHIP project, 7th Framework Programme (FP7)Google Scholar
  28. MSPTD (2011) Territorial agenda of the European Union 2020. Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Agreed at the informal ministerial meeting of ministers responsible for spatial planning and territorial development on 19th May 2011 Gödöllő, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  29. MUMEU (2016) Urban agenda for the EU. Pact of Amsterdam. Agreed at the informal meeting of EU ministers responsible for urban matters on 30 May 2016 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/pact-of-amsterdam_en.pdf
  30. Mehlbye P, Böhme K (2017) More territorial cooperation post 2020? A contribution to the debate of future EU cohesion policy, Spatial Foresight Brief No. 2017:8. Spatial Foresight, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  31. National Intelligence Council (2012) Global Trends 2030: Alternative worldsGoogle Scholar
  32. OECD (2006) Competitive cities in the global economy, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=184113
  33. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (2016) Cities in Europe: facts and figures on cities and urban areas. PBL Publications, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  34. Randers J (2012) 2052: a global forecast for the next forty years. Chelsea Green Pub, White River Junction, VermontGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodríguez-Pose A (2017) The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it), in Cambridge. J Reg Econ Soc 11:189–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosa H, Kipping K, Paech N (2018) Anders wachsen! Von der Krise der kapitalistischen Wachstumsgesellschaft und Ansätzen einer Transformation (Becker M, Reinicke M, eds). oekom, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosling H, Rosling O, Rönnlund AR (2018) Factfulness: ten reasons we’re wrong about the world–and why things are better than you think, 1st edn. Flatiron Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Réchard D, Noonan E, Schmertzing L, Windle-Wehrle F, Frey A, Cesluk-Grajewski M (2016) Global trendometer. essays on medium- and long-term global trends. European Parliamentary Research Service, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  39. Schwab K (2017) The fourth industrial revolution. Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
  40. Vöckler K (2015) Die kommende “Welt-Polis”. Inf zur Raumentwickl 4:323–333Google Scholar
  41. Welzer H (2016) Die smarte Diktatur: der Angriff auf unsere Freiheit, 3rd edn. S. Fischer, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  42. World Bank (2018) Rethinking lagging regions. Using cohesion policy to deliver on the potential of Europe’s regions. World Bank Report on the European UnionGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Spatial ForesightHeisdorfLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations