Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Debating the Urban Dimension of Territorial Cohesion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Territorial Cohesion

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

The Territorial Cohesion goal was only included in the EU Treaty by 2009, with a view to promote a more balanced and harmonious European territory. One year earlier (2008), the European Commission (EC) published the ‘Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion —Turning territorial diversity into strength’. Neither one, nor the other, clearly defines the meaning of the Territorial Cohesion concept. The later, however, proposes three main policy responses towards more balanced and harmonious development: (i) Concentration : overcoming differences in density; (ii) Connecting territories: overcoming distance; and (iii) Cooperation: overcoming division. Although not explicitly, this document identifies several ‘urban questions’ to be dealt when promoting territorial cohesive policies: avoiding diseconomies of very large agglomerations and urban sprawl processes, combating urban decay and social exclusion, avoiding excessive concentrations of growth, promoting access to integrated transport systems and creating metropolitan bodies. In this light, this chapter proposes to debate the importance of the urban dimension to achieve the goal of territorial cohesion at several territorial levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/funding/special-support-instruments/jessica/#2

  2. 2.

    http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/themes/urban-development/

  3. 3.

    http://urbact.eu/

References

  • Abrahams G (2014) What “Is” Territorial Cohesion? What does it “Do”? Essentialist versus pragmatic approaches to using concepts. Eur Plan Stud 22(10):2134–2155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.819838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson R (2001) The emerging ‘Urban Agenda’ and the European spatial development perspective: towards an EU urban policy? Eur Plan Stud 9(3):385–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley J, Zaucha J (2017) Territorial cohesion: a missing link between economic growth and welfare Lessons from the Baltic Tiger. Uniwersytet Gdański Katedra Makroekonomii, Gdansk

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprotti F, Cowley R, Datta A, Broto VC, Gao E, Georgeson L, Herrick C, Odendaal N, Joss S (2017) The new urban agenda: key opportunities and challenges for policy and practice. Urban Res Pract 10(3):367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter J (2006) Addressing Europe’s urban challenges: lessons from the EU URBAN community initiative. Urban Stud 43(12):2145–2162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton J, Díaz-Fuentes D, Fernández-Gutiérrez M (2016) Public infrastructure services in the European Union: challenges for territorial cohesion. Reg Stud 50(2):358–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1044958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colomb C, Santinha G (2014) European Union competition policy and the European territorial cohesion agenda: an impossible reconciliation? State aid rules and public service liberalization through the European spatial planning lens. Eur Plan Stud 22(3):459–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.744384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COR (2003) Territorial cohesion in Europe. Committee of the Regions, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorianopoulos I, Iossifides T (2006) The neoliberal framework of EU urban policy in action: supporting competitiveness and reaping disparities. Local Econ 21(4):409–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dąbrowski M (2014) Engineering multilevel governance? Joint European support for sustainable investment in city areas (JESSICA) and the involvement of private and financial actors in urban development policy, regional studies. Reg Stud 48(12):2006–2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dao H, Cantoreggi PP, Rousseaux V (2017) Operationalizing a contested concept: indicators of territorial cohesion. Eur Plan Stud 25(4):638–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1281230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi S (2005) Understanding territorial cohesion. Planning Pract Res 20(4):433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delladetsima P (2003) What prospects for urban policy in Europe? City 7(2):153–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (1996) First report on economic and social cohesion. European Commission, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (1999) ESDP. European spatial development perspective. Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union, European Communities, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2001) Second report on economic and social cohesion. European Commission, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2004) Third report on economic and social cohesion, Convergence. Competitiveness and cooperation. European Commission, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2007) Fourth report on economic and social cohesion, growing regions, growing Europe. European Commission, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2008) Green paper on territorial cohesion. Turning territorial diversity into strength. Communication from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, The Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee, Oct 2008, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2010) Investing in Europe’s future: fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. European Commission, Nov 2010, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2014a) Sixth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Investment for jobs and growth: promoting development and good governance in EU regions and cities, European Commission, July 2014, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2014b) The urban dimension of EU policies—key features of an EU urban agenda. COM (2014) 490 final, European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2017) Seventh report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. My Region, My Europe, Our Future. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2010) The territorial dimension of environmental sustainability. Potential territorial indicators to support the environmental dimension of territorial cohesion. European Environment Agency. EEA Technical Report no 92010, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON 3.2 (2006) Spatial scenarios and orientations in relation to the ESDP and cohesion policy, ESPON project 3.2, Third Interim Report. January 2006, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON INTERCO (2011) Indicators of territorial cohesion, Scientific Platform and Tools Project 2013/3/2, (Draft) Final Report, Part C, Scientific report, ESPON & University of Geneva, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON KITCASP (2012) Key indicators for territorial cohesion and spatial planning, Interim Report, Version 31/10/2012, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON (2014a) Territorial dynamics in Europe. Evidence for a European urban agenda, Territorial Observation no 13, European Spatial Planning Observatory Network, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON (2014b) Making Europe open and polycentric. Vision and scenarios for the European territory towards 2050, European Spatial Planning Observatory Network, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON (2016) ESPON policy briefing—polycentric territorial structures and territorial cooperation. European Spatial Planning Observatory Network, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi A (2004) Territorial cohesion: old (French) wine in new bottles? Urban Stud 41(7):1349–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faludi A (2005) Territorial cohesion: an unidentified political objective: introduction to the special issue. Town Planning Rev 76(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.76.1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faludi A (2006) From European spatial development to territorial cohesion policy. Reg Stud 40(6):667–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600868937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faludi A (2007) Territorial cohesion policy and the European model of society. Eur Plan Stud 15(4):567–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701232079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glinka K (2017) Integrated territorial investment as instrument for managing transport security in lower Silesia’s largest cities. Sci J Silesian Univ Technol Ser Transp 94(2017):37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • González A, Daly G, Pinch P, Adams N, Valtenbergs V, Burns MC, Johannesson H (2015) Indicators for spatial planning and territorial cohesion: stakeholder-driven selection approach for improving usability at regional and local levels. Reg Stud 49(9):1588–1602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1018883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holder J, Layard A (2011) Drawing out the elements of territorial cohesion: re-scaling EU spatial governance. Yearb Eur Law 30(1):358–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yer016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janin Rivolin U (2005) The future of the ESDP in the framework of territorial cohesion, disP—The Planning Review 41(161): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2005.10556921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamrowska-Zaluska D, Obracht-Prondzynska H (2017) Implementation of the integrated territorial investments. In: Medeiros E (ed) Uncovering the territorial dimension of European Union cohesion policy. Routledge, London and New York, pp 114–126

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lang T, Török I (2017) Metropolitan region policies in the European Union: following national, European or neoliberal agendas? Int Plan Stud 22(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leipzig Charter (2007) Leipzig Charter on sustainable European cities, agreed on the occasion of the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion in Leipzig on 24/25 May 2007, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen J, Moilanen H (2012) Territoriality in the strategies and practices of the territorial cohesion policy of the European Union: territorial challenges in implementing “soft planning”. Eur Plan Stud 20(3):481–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.651806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mccann P, Vargam A (2015) The reforms to the regional and urban policy of the European Union: EU cohesion policy. Reg Stud 49(8):1255–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros E (2005) A coesão territorial nas NUTS III de fronteira de Portugal Continental—A iniciativa INTERREG-A e o desenvolvimento regional. O caso da NUT III do Alentejo Central, Master Thesis, Lisbon University, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros E (2014) Territorial cohesion trends in inner Scandinavia: the role of cross-border cooperation (INTERREG-A 1994–2010). Nor Geogr Tidsskr 68(5):310–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2014.960949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros E (2016a) Territorial cohesion: an EU concept. Eur J Spat Dev 60. Available from: http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereed%20articles/refereed60.pdf

  • Medeiros E, Rauhut D (2018) Is territorial cohesion possible via the EU cohesion policy? Testing a ‘territorial cohesion cities’ policy rationale, Regional Studies, being reviewed

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp P, Kourtit K (2013) The “New Urban Europe”: global challenges and local responses in the urban century. Eur Plan Stud 21(3):291–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olejnik A (2017) Future perspectives of the implementation of EU urban Agenda. Interdisc Polit Cult J 19(1):175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partidário MR, Correia FN (2004) Polis—the Portuguese programme on urban environment. A contribution to the discussion on European Urban Policy. Eur Plan Stud 12(3):409–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patlitzianas K (2011) An analysis of energy efficiency investments’ environment in Greece—the potential role of JESSICA instrument. Energy Convers Manage 52(2011):366–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite D (2016) Successful, safe and sustainable cities: towards a New Urban Agenda. Commonwealth J Local Governance 19(2016):3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön P (2005) Territorial cohesion in Europe? Plan Theory Pract 6(3):389–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350500209397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servillo L (2010) Territorial cohesion discourses: hegemonic strategic concepts in European spatial planning. Plan Theory Pract 11(3):397–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2010.500135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper M, Scott AJ (2016) Current debates in urban theory: a critical assessment. Urban Stud 53(6):1114–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarnawska K, Rosiek J (2015) The JESSICA initiative: an instrument for urban sustainable development. Examples of urban regeneration in Silesia (Poland) and Central Moravia (Czech Republic). Comp Econ Res 18(2):119–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Territorial Agenda 2020 (2011) Territorial agenda of the European Union 2020—towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Retrieved from http://www.eu2011.hu/files/bveu/documents/TA2020.pdf

  • URBACT (2014) URBACT III operational programme. European regional development fund 2014–2020, European Territorial Cooperation, European Programme for Sustainable Urban Development, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Agenda (2016) Establishing the Urban Agenda for the EU. ‘Pact of Amsterdam’. Agreed at the Informal Meeting of EU Ministers Responsible for Urban Matters on 30 May 2016 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Zwet A, Bachtler J, Ferry M, McMaster I, Miller S (2017) Integrated territorial and urban strategies: how are ESIF adding value in 2014–2020? Final Report, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Well L (2012) Conceptualizing the logics of territorial cohesion. Eur Plan Stud 20(9):1549–1567. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.708021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanolo A (2010) European spatial planning between competitiveness and territorial cohesion: shadows of neo-liberalism. Eur Plan Stud 18(8):1301–1315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003791358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zillmer S, Böhme K, Lüer C (2012) Territorial cohesion in future EU cohesion policy. Final report for the research project “The territorial dimension of future EU cohesion policy” (Forschung issue 156 ed, p 53). Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs (BMVBS), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DINÂMIA-CET IUL - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal

    Eduardo Medeiros

Authors
  1. Eduardo Medeiros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Medeiros .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. DINÂMIA’CET-IUL, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal

    Eduardo Medeiros

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Medeiros, E. (2019). Debating the Urban Dimension of Territorial Cohesion. In: Medeiros, E. (eds) Territorial Cohesion. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03386-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation