Advertisement

Electricity Market Integration and the Impact of Unilateral Policy Reforms

  • Luigi Grossi
  • Sven HeimEmail author
  • Kai Hüschelrath
  • Michael Waterson
Chapter

Abstract

We investigate the impact that two German energy reforms—phase-out of nuclear power plants after the Fukushima incident and expansion of renewables due to fixed feed-in tariffs—had on neighbouring countries’ consumers. The unilateral German reforms generated substantial negative and positive impacts, respectively, in neighbouring countries with the highest overall effect of German policy found in France, not Germany; an annual negative impact on consumers of 3.15 billion €. We also find significant differences in market integration between neighbouring countries by calculating ratios between the estimated policy decisions’ impacts before and after controlling for interconnector congestion.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Ulrich Laitenberger, Philipp Schmidt-Dengler, Frank Wolak, Oliver Woll, the editor James Forder and two anonymous referees for helpful remarks and Bastian Sattelberger for excellent research assistance. The paper has benefited from presentation at the 2015 CRESSE conference.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available online at the OUP website. This comprises an online Appendix and the data replication files. The data used in the paper are bought from commercial providers and are not publicly available. Independent researchers, however, can be given access to the data required to run the do-file at ZEW subject to the signing of a data usage contract. The usage contract allows independent researchers to access the data, but not to take the data set away from ZEW.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council of the UK under grant number EP/K002228 to MW. We benefited from the facilities of ZEW in producing the paper.

References

  1. Antweiler, W. (2016). Cross-border trade in electricity. Journal of International Economics, 101, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baritaud, M., & Volk, D. (2014). Seamless power markets: Regional integration of electricity markets in IEA member countries. OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
  3. Berk, I., & Yetkiner, H. (2014). Energy prices and economic growth: Theory and evidence in the long run. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 36, 228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blundell, R., & Powell, J. (2004). Endogeneity in semiparametric binary response models. Review of Economic Studies, 71, 581–913.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Böckers, V., & Heimeshoff, U. (2014). The extent of European power markets. Energy Economics, 46, 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Booz & Company, Newbery, D., Strbac, G., Pudjianto, D., Noel, P., & LeighFisher. (2013). Benefits of an integrated European energy market. Final Report prepared for European Commission (Directorate-General Energy), Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  7. Borenstein, S. (2012). The private and public economics of renewable electricity generation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26, 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brander, J., & Spencer, B. (1985). Export subsidies and market share rivalry. Journal of International Economics, 18, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cox, M., Peichl, A., Pestel, N., & Siegloch, S. (2014). Labor demand effects of rising electricity prices: Evidence for Germany. Energy Policy, 75, 266–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, L., & Hausman, C. (2016). Market impacts of a nuclear power plant closure. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8, 92–122.Google Scholar
  11. De Jong, H., Hakvoort, R., & Sharma, M. (2007). Effects of flow-based market coupling for the CWE region. In Proceedings of the 4th European Congress Economics and Management of Energy in Industry, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  12. De Menezes, L. M., & Houllier, M. A. (2015). Germany’s nuclear power plant closures and the integration of electricity markets in Europe. Energy Policy, 85, 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Domanico, F. (2007). Concentration in the European electricity industry: The internal market as solution? Energy Policy, 35, 5064–5076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission. (2015). Energy Union Package, communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, achieving the 10% electricity interconnection target, making Europe’s electricity grid fit for 2020, COM(2015) 82 final, Brussels.Google Scholar
  15. German Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. (2014). Stromerzeugungskapazitäten, Bruttostromerzeugung, Energiedaten und Bruttostromverbrauch, Berlin.Google Scholar
  16. Green, R. (2007). Nodal pricing of electricity: How much does it cost to get it wrong? Journal of Regulatory Economics, 31, 125–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grossi, L., Heim, S., & Waterson, M. (2017). The impact of the German response to the Fukushima Earthquake. Energy Economics, 66, 450–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton, J. (1983). Oil and macroeconomy since world war II. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 228–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hardle, W., & Mammen, E. (1993). Comparing nonparametric versus parametric regression fits. Annals of Statistics, 21, 1926–1947.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Imbens, G., & Wooldridge, J. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 5–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jauréguy-Naudin, M. (2012). The European power system – Decarbonization and cost reduction: Lost in transmissions? In Note de l’Ifri. Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Joskow, P. (2011). Comparing the costs of intermittent and dispatchable electricity generating technologies. American Economic Review, 101, 238–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kilian, L. (2008). The economic effects of energy price shocks. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 871–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knopf, B., Pahle, M., Kondziella, H., Joas, F., Edenhofer, O., & Bruckner, T. (2014). Germany’s nuclear phase-out: Sensitivities and impacts on electricity prices and CO2 emissions. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 3, 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kristiansen, T. (2007a). A preliminary assessment of the market coupling arrangement on the kontek cable. Energy Policy, 35, 3247–3255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kristiansen, T. (2007b). An assessment of the Danish–German cross-border auctions. Energy Policy, 35, 3369–3382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krugman, P., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. (2014). International economics: Theory and policy (10th ed.). Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Leuthold, F., Rumiantseva, I., Weigt, H., Jeske, T., & von Hirschhausen, C. (2005). Nodal pricing in the German electricity sector – A welfare economics analysis, with particular reference to implementing offshore wind capacities. Working Paper WP-EM-08a, Dresden University of Technology, Chair for Energy Economics and Public Sector Management.Google Scholar
  29. Lewbel, A. (2012). Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 30, 67–80.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mjelde, J., & Bessler, D. (2009). Market integration among electricity markets and their major fuel source markets. Energy Economics, 31, 482–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mork, K. (1989). Oil and the macroeconomy when prices go up and down: An extension of Hamilton’s results. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 740–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neuhoff, K., Barquin, J., Bialek, J., Boyd, R., Dent, C., Echavarren, F., Grau, T., von Hirschhausen, C., Hobbs, B., Kunz, F., Nabe, C., Papaefthymiou, G., Weber, C., & Weigt, H. (2013). Renewable electric energy integration: Quantifying the value of design of markets for international transmission capacity. Energy Economics, 40, 760–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Newbery, D., Strbac, G., & Viehoff, I. (2015). The benefits of integrating European electricity markets. EPRG Working Paper 1504, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  34. Nitsche, R., Ockenfels, A., Röller, L. H., & Wiethaus, L. (2010). The electricity wholesale sector: Market integration and competition. ESMT White Paper WP-110-01, Berlin.Google Scholar
  35. Oseni, M. O., & Pollitt, M. G. (2014). Institutional arrangements for the promotion of regional integration of electricity markets. World Bank Development Research Group, Policy Research Working Paper 6947.Google Scholar
  36. Pellini, E. (2014). Essays on European electricity market integration. PhD Thesis, Surrey Energy Economics Centre, Guildford.Google Scholar
  37. Pollitt, M. (2009a). Evaluating the evidence on electricity reform: Lessons for the South East Europe (SEE) market. Utilities Policy, 17, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pollitt, M. (2009b). Electricity liberalisation in the European union: A progress report. Electricity Policy Research Group Working Paper No. 0929, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  39. Pollitt, M. (2012). The role of policy in energy transitions: Lessons from the energy liberalisation era. Energy Policy, 50, 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Puka, L., & Szulecki, K. (2014). Beyond the “Grid-Lock” in electricity interconnectors, DIW Discussion Paper 1378, Berlin.Google Scholar
  41. Ragwitz, M., Winkler, J., Klessmann, C., Gephart, M., & Resch, G. (2012). Recent developments of feed-in systems in the EU – A research paper for the International Feed-In Cooperation, Report Commissioned by the Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
  42. Robinson, P. (1988). Root-n-consistent semiparametric regression. Econometrica, 56, 931–954.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robinson, T. (2007). The convergence of electricity prices in Europe. Applied Economics Letters, 14, 473–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Serralles, R. (2006). Electric energy restructuring in the European union: Integration, subsidiarity and the challenge of harmonization. Energy Policy, 34, 2542–2551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zachmann, G. (2008). Electricity wholesale market prices in Europe: Convergence? Energy Economics, 30, 1659–1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luigi Grossi
    • 1
  • Sven Heim
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Kai Hüschelrath
    • 3
    • 4
  • Michael Waterson
    • 3
    • 5
  1. 1.University of VeronaVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Mines ParisTechParisFrance
  3. 3.ZEW Centre for European Economic ResearchMannheimGermany
  4. 4.Schmalkalden University of Applied ScienceSchmalkaldenGermany
  5. 5.University of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations