Advertisement

On the Alleged Need to Strictly “Europeanize” the German Energiewende

  • Sebastian StrunzEmail author
  • Erik Gawel
  • Paul Lehmann
Chapter

Abstract

Germany has embarked on an ambitious project to transform its energy system until 2050—the so-called Energiewende. Some critics contend that the Energiewende imposes unnecessary and avoidable welfare losses due to a lack of integration within the EU. In contrast, these critiques largely miss the point because the asserted lack of integration cannot be pinned on the Energiewende and the welfare consequences of EU-wide integration are less clear than the critiques imply.

References

  1. Acatech (Ed.). (2015). Die Energiewende europäisch integrieren. Neue Gestalstungsmöglichkeiten für die gemeinsame Energie- und Klimapolitik. Berlin: Acatech.Google Scholar
  2. Bigerna, S., Bollino, C. A., & Micheli, S. (2016). Renewable energy scenarios for cost reductions in the European Union. Renewable Energy, 96, 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchan, D., & Keay, M. (2016). Europe’s long energy journey: Towards an Energy Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. EU Commission. (2014). Communication from the commission. Guidelines on state aid for environmental protection and energy 2014–2020. Official Journal of the European Union (2014/C 200/01).Google Scholar
  5. Frondel, M., Schmidt, C., & Aus Dem Moore, N. (2013). Marktwirtschaftliche Energiewende: Ein Wettbewerbsrahmen für die Stromversorgung mit alternativen Technologien. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 37(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gawel, E., & Purkus, A. (2012). Promoting market and system integration of renewable energies through premium schemes—A case study of the German market premium. Energy Policy, 61, 599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gawel, E., & Strunz, S. (2014). State aid dispute on Germany’s support for renewables: Is the commission on the right course? Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 11(2), 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gawel, E., Strunz, S., & Lehmann, P. (2014). Wieviel Europa braucht die Energiewende? Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 38(3), 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grams, C., Beerli, R., Pfenninger, S., Staffell, I., & Wernli, H. (2017). Balancing Europe’s wind-power output through spatial deployment informed by weather regimes. Nature Climate Change, 7, 557–562.  https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE3338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gullberg, A.-T. (2012). The political feasibility of Norway as the “green battery” of Europe. Energy Policy, 57, 615–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haucap, J., & Kühling, J. (2012). Zeit für eine grundlegende Reform der EEG-Förderung – das Quotenmodell. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 63(3), 41–49.Google Scholar
  12. Hübner, M., Schmidt, C., & Weigert, B. (2012). Energiepolitik: Erfolgreiche Energiewende nur im europäischen Kontext. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 13(4), 286–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobs, D. (2012). Renewable energy policy convergence in the EU: The evolution of feed-in tariffs in Germany, Spain and France. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Kitzing, L., Mitchell, C., & Mothorst, P. (2012). Renewable energy policies in Europe: Converging or diverging? Energy Policy, 51, 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Macilwain, C. (2012). Supergrid: Is a vast undersea grid bringing wind-generated electricity from the North Sea to Europe a feasible proposition or an overpriced fantasy? Nature, 468, 624–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Monopolies Commission. (2017). Energie 2017: Gezielt vorgehen, Stückwerk vermeiden. Sondergutachten 77, Bonn.Google Scholar
  17. Mundt, A. (2013). Die Energiewende braucht Marktvertrauen. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Recht der Energiewirtschaft, 2(6), 241–242.Google Scholar
  18. Sinn, H.-W. (2012). Zu viele unrealistische Hoffnungen und zu wenig Pragmatismus. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 62(1/2), 54–56.Google Scholar
  19. Sinn, H.-W. (2017). Buffering volatility. A study on the limits of Germany’s energy revolution. European Economic Review, 99, 130–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Söderholm, P. (2008). Harmonization of renewable feed-in laws: A comment. Energy Policy, 36, 946–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Strunz, S., Gawel, E., & Lehmann, P. (2015). Towards a general “Europeanization” of EU Member States’ energy policies? Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 4(2), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Unteutsch, M., & Lindenberger, D. (2014). Promotion of electricity from renewable energy in Europe post 2020 – The economic benefits of cooperation. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 38(1), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weimann, J. (2012). Atomausstieg und Energiewende: Wie sinnvoll ist der deutsche Alleingang? Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 62(12), 34–38.Google Scholar
  24. Weimann, J. (2013). Rettet die Energiewende? Warum eigentlich? Wirtschaftsdienst, 93(11), 793–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weitzman, M. L. (1974). Prices vs. quantities. Review of Economic Studies, 41(4), 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Infrastructure and Resources ManagementLeipzig UniversityLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations