Energy-Efficient Casting Processes

  • Emanuele PagoneEmail author
  • Konstantinos Salonitis
  • Mark Jolly
Part of the Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology book series (MFMT)


Metal casting is one of the most energy-intensive manufacturing processes that have developed along the evolution of mankind. Although nowadays its scientific and technological aspects are well established, in the context of future resource scarcity and environmental pollution pressures, new studies appear necessary to describe the “foundry of the future” where energy and material efficiency are of great importance to guarantee competitiveness alongside environmental protection. In this chapter, both managerial and technical good practices aimed at implementing energy-efficient casting processes are presented alongside a few examples. The “Small is Beautiful” philosophy is presented as a systematic approach towards energy resilient manufacturing and, potentially, sustainability in the long term. Thus, this chapter aims at providing an overview of the different aspects comprising the state of the art in the industry and examples of research themes in academia about energy-efficient casting processes.


Casting Foundry Sustainability Energy efficiency 



The authors would like to acknowledge the UK EPSRC projects “Small is Beautiful” (EP/M013863/1) and “Energy Resilient Manufacturing 2: Small is Beautiful Phase 2 (SIB2)” (EP/P012272/1) for the support of this work. All data are provided in full.


  1. 1.
    Jolly MR (2003) Castings. In: Milne I, Ritchie RO, Karihaloo B (eds) Comprehensive structural integrity, 1st edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 377–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. CapstoneGoogle Scholar
  3. 3., Accessed on 7th August 2017
  4. 4.
    The European Foundry Association., Accessed on 7th August 2017
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    The World Foundry Organisation., Accessed on 7th August 2017
  7. 7.
    Jolly MR, Salonitis K, Charnley F, Ball P, Mehrabi H, Pagone E (2017) Energy efficiency status-quo at UK foundries: the “small-is-beautiful” project. In: Ratvik AP (ed) Light metals 2017. Springer, Cham, pp 917–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    DeGarmo EP, Black JT, Kohser RA (2003) Materials and processes in manufacturing, 9th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    American Society for Metals (1980) ASM handbook, 1st edn. Ohio, ASM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schifo JF, Radia JT (2004) Theoretical/best practice energy use in metalcasting operations. USA Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Torielli RM, Abrahams RA, Smillie RW, Voigt RC (2011) Using lean methodologies for economically and environmentally sustainable foundries. In: The 69th world foundry congressGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duflou JR, Sutherland JW, Dornfield S, Herrmann C, Jeswiet J, Kara S, Hauschild M, Kellens K (2012) Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: a processes and systems approach. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(2):587–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brunke JC, Johansson M, Thollander P (2014) Empirical investigation of barriers and drivers to the adoption of energy conservation measures, energy management practices and energy services in the Swedish iron and steel industry. J Clean Prod 84(1):509–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cagno E, Trucco P, Trianni A, Sala G (2010) Quick-E-scan: a methodology for the energy scan of SMEs. Energy 35(5):1916–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sa A, Paramonova S, Thollander P, Cagno E (2015) Classification of industrial energy management practices—a case study of a Swedish foundry. Energy Procedia 75:2581–2588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thollander P, Ottosson M (2010) Energy management practices in Swedish energy-intensive industries. J Clean Prod 18(12):1125–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Womack JP (1990) The machine that changed the world: based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile. Rawson Associates, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herrmann C, Thiede S, Stehr J, Bergmann L (2008) An environmental perspective on lean production, manufacturing systems and technologies for the New Frontier. In: The 41st CIRP conference on manufacturing systems, vol 83Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lean Manufacturing and the Environment (2007) Research on advanced manufacturing systems and the environment and recommendations for leveraging better environmental performance, USA Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shingo Prize for Operational Excellence (2010) Application guidelines. Utah State University Jon M Huntsman School of Business, LoganGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abdulmalek FA, Rajgopal J (2007) Analyzing the benefits of lean manufacturing and value stream mapping via simulation: a process sector case study. Int J Prod Econ 107(1):223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Besta P, Stoch M, Haverland J (2011) Lean manufacturing concept in metallurgical industry. MetalGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rothenberg S, Pil F, Maxwell J (2001) Lean, green, and the quest for superior environmental performance. Produc Oper Manage 10:228–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang C, Lin S, Chan Y, Sheu C (2010) Mediated effect of environmental management on manufacturing competitiveness: an empirical study. Int J Prod Econ 123:210–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    King AA, Lenox MJ (2001) Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Produc Oper Manage 10:244–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ISO Energy Management System (2011) ISO standard 50001. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Salonitis K, Jolly MR, Zeng B, Mehrabi H (2016) Improvements in energy consumption and environmental impact by novel single shot melting process for casting. J Clean Prod 137:1532–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gandhi NM, Selladurai V, Santhi P (2006) Green productivity indexing: a practical step towards integrating environmental protection into corporate performance. Int J Produc Perform Manage 55:594–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nimbulkar SL, Dalu RS (2016) Design optimization of gating and feeding system through simulation technique for sand casting of wear plate. Perspect Sci 8:39–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McCright PR, Bergmiller GG (2010) Techniques for enhancing sustainability of industrial operations. In: IEEE green technology conference, Lubbox, USAGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    de Oliveira CS, Pinto EB (2008) Lean manufacturing paradigm in the foundry industry. Estudos Tecnologicos em Engenharia 4(3):218–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hari Priya G, Ramakrishna H, Sundara Rajalu Y (2015) Sand casting process improvement using lean principles. Int J Res Eng Technol 4(14):97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Suarez M, Davila JA, Vasquez F (2006) Supply chain value stream mapping: a new tool of operation management. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 33(4):518–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lazzarin M, Noro RM (2016) Energy audit experiences in foundries. Int J Energy Environ Eng 7(4):409–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arasu M, Jeffrey RL (2009) Energy consumption studies in cast iron foundries. In: Transaction of 57th IFCGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yilmaz O, Anctil A, Karanfil T (2015) LCA as a decision support tool for evaluation of best available techniques (BATs) for cleaner production of iron casting. J Clean Prod 105:337–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shan Z, Qin S, Liu Q, Liu F (2012) Key manufacturing technology & equipment for energy saving and emissions reduction in mechanical equipment industry. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(7):1095–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gigante G (2010) How can we become a practical green foundry industry? Int J Metal Cast 4(3):7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dai X, Jolly MR, Zeng B (2011) The capability enhancement of aluminium casting process by application of the novel CRIMSON method. In: Shape casting: 4th international symposium, pp 265–272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Volvo—A foundry with a vision., Accessed on 7th August 2017
  41. 41.
    Pagone E, Jolly MR, Salonitis K (2016) The development of a tool to promote sustainability in casting processes. Procedia CIRP 55:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pagone E, Jolly MR, Salonitis K (2017) A tool to promote sustainability in casting processes: development highlights. In: Campana G, Howlett RJ, Setchi R, Cimatti B (eds) Selected papers on sustainable design and manufacturing. Springer, Cham, pp 172–184Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gansner ER, North SC (2000) An open graph visualization system and its applications to software engineering. Softw Pract Exp 30(11):1203–1233Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bostock M, Ogievetsky V, Heer J (2011) D3: data-driven documents. IEEE Trans Visual Comp Graphics (Proc InfoVis)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emanuele Pagone
    • 1
    Email author
  • Konstantinos Salonitis
    • 1
  • Mark Jolly
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Aerospace Transport and ManufacturingSustainable Manufacturing Systems Centre, Cranfield UniversityCranfieldUK

Personalised recommendations