Advertisement

WTO as a Self-Limited Regime: The Case of Article XX of GATT

  • Alberto do Amaral Júnior
  • Cynthia Kramer
Chapter

Abstract

A self-limited regime consists in a set of agreements with some governing principles and rules that do not exclude out of hand other rules of public international law. The World Trade Organization (WTO) panels and Appellate Body have insistently demonstrated the openness of the WTO to public international law. However, this openness is limited and by no means governs the WTO’s specific nature. WTO cannot work efficaciously as a closed regime, but the pursuit of further agreements to be applied is limited by a bias toward trade that runs through decisions of the WTO Dispute Settlement System. Of course, the interpretation of Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) is a sort of “filter” by which outside treaties are invoked but tensions with WTO logic are not acknowledged. As a result, consolidating suitable safeguards for plant, animal, and human life and natural resources becomes almost impossible within the WTO.

References

  1. Condon B (2002) Multilateral environmental agreements and the WTO: is the sky really falling. Tulsa J Comp Int Law 9(2):547Google Scholar
  2. do Amaral Júnior A (2010) Comércio Internacional e a Proteção do Meio Ambiente. Atlas, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  3. do Amaral Júnior A et al (2009) O Artigo XX do GATT, meio ambiente e direitos humanos. São Paulo, AduaneirasGoogle Scholar
  4. Gaines S (2001) The WTO’s reading of the GATT Article XX chapeau: a disguised restriction on environmental measures. J Int Econ Law 22(4):778. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=301404. Accessed on 16 Feb 2018Google Scholar
  5. Koskenniemi M (13 April 2006) Fragmentation of international law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law. United Nations Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission (ILC). A/CN.4/L.682Google Scholar
  6. Paltrowitz JH (2001) A “greening” of the World Trade Organization? A case comment on the Asbestos report. Brooklyn J Int Law 26(4):1789–1838Google Scholar
  7. Schoenbaum TJ (1997) International trade and protection of the environment: the continuing search for reconciliation. Am J Int Law 91(2):268–313.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2954212. Published by: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto do Amaral Júnior
    • 1
  • Cynthia Kramer
    • 2
  1. 1.University of São Paulo Law School, International and Compared LawSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Fundação Getulio VargasSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations