Advertisement

Flexibilities Under Article 39.3 of the TRIPS Agreement: Protection of Pharmaceutical Test Data and the Case of Brazil

  • Letícia Frazão LemeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This article focuses on the Lundbeck v. ANVISA case to analyze the flexibilities regarding the protection of pharmaceutical test data under Article 39.3 of the TRIPS Agreement. It argues that ANVISA’s granting of marketing approval for generic medicines on the basis of bioequivalence studies does not breach Brazil’s obligations under the TRIPS Agreement. This abbreviated process of approval is an important tool in fostering an industry for generic medicines. The text of Article 39.3 needs to be interpreted flexibly and in light of the objective to promote access to medicines for all.

Keywords

Pharmaceutical test data Access to medicines Lundbeck 

References

  1. Brazil. Federal Senate Diary (2001, November 12) 22-312 pGoogle Scholar
  2. Brazil. Superior Justice Tribunal (2011, August 17) Process 2011/0184444-8. Lundbeck v. ANVISA (Interim measures)Google Scholar
  3. Brazil. TRF 1st Region, 7th District (2011, May 9) Process 2008.34.00.016643-4. Lundbeck v. ANVISA (Merits)Google Scholar
  4. Brazil. TRF 1st Region, Court of Appeals (2011, June 6) Process 0028831-10.2011.4.01.0000/DF. Lundbeck v. ANVISA (Interim measures)Google Scholar
  5. CADE, Administrative Process (2012, April 20) Process 08012.006377/2010-25. Pró-Genéricos v LundbeckGoogle Scholar
  6. Correa CM (2002a) Protection of data submitted for the registration of pharmaceuticals: implementing the standards of the TRIPS agreement. South Centre, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. Correa CM (2002b) Implications of the Doha declaration on the TRIPS agreement and public health. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  8. de Carvalho NP (2014) TRIPS regime of patents and test data, 4th edn. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar
  9. Dimasi JA, Grabowski HG, Hansen RW (2016) Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry new estimates of R & D costs. J Health Econ 47:20–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gervais D (2010) Analysis of the compatibility of certain tobacco product packaging rules with the TRIPS agreement and the Paris Convention, Expert report prepared for Japan Tobacco International, 30 November 2010, para 58. Available at: http://www.smoke-free.ca/trade-and-tobacco/Resources/Gervais.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2016
  11. Jucá AP, Mattos E (2006) A Devida Proteção à Informação Não-Divulgada e o Registro de Medicamentos Genéricos no Brasil. ANVISA Policy Paper, BrasiliaGoogle Scholar
  12. Knowledge Ecology International (KEI), Size of Clinical Trials, KEI Research Note 2014:3. Available at: http://keionline.org/node/2124. Accessed 2 Feb 2016
  13. Malbon J, Lawson C, Davison M (2014) The WTO agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights: a commentary. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MERCOSUR. Arbitral Tribunal (2002, June 19) Laudo Arbitral del Tribunal “Ad Hoc” de Mercosur. Obstáculos al ingreso de productos fitosanitarios argentinos en el mercado brasileño”Google Scholar
  15. Stoll P, Busche J, Arend K (2009) WTO: trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  16. UNCTAD (2011) Using intellectual property rights to stimulate pharmaceutical production in developing countries: a reference guide. New York and GenevaGoogle Scholar
  17. Watal J (2001) Intellectual property rights in the WTO and developing countries. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar
  18. World Trade Organization. World Intellectual Property Organization, and World Health Organization (2013) Promoting access to medical technologies and innovation. Geneva, 2013. Available at: http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/who-wipo-wto_2013_e.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2016
  19. Yu PK (2004) Current and crosscurrents in the international intellectual property regime. Loyola Los Angeles Law Rev 38(7):324–442Google Scholar
  20. Yu PK (2009) The objectives and principles of the trips agreement. Houston Law Rev 46:797–1046Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brazilian Ministry of Foreign AffairsBrasiliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations