Advertisement

Litigation and Negotiation in the WTO. Is Litigation the Continuation of Negotiation by Other Means?

  • Paulo Estivallet de MesquitaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The creation of the WTO has provided unprecedented stability, predictability, and transparency to the management of international trade. In order to ensure the relevance of its rules, the WTO agreements established an efficient dispute settlement mechanism and provided for future negotiations to complement and expand the scope of existing rules and commitments. The contrasting fortunes of these two pillars of the multilateral trading system raise questions about the extent to which litigation might make up for the difficulty in advancing comprehensive negotiations in the WTO.

References

  1. Alvarez L (2015) Judicialización de la política y soberanía popular: Sobre el estatuto político de las resoluciones judiciales. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, Coimbra 108:95–110 ISSN 2182-7435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernhofen DM et al (2017) Estimating the effects of the container revolution on world trade. http://www.american.edu/cas/economics/news/upload/Bernhofen-Paper.pdf
  3. D’Amato A (1987) The limits of legal realism. Yale Law J 87(3):468–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, voice and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Hudec RE (1980) GATT dispute settlement after the Tokyo Round: an unfinished business. Cornell Int Law J 13(2):151Google Scholar
  6. Lafer C (1996) The World Trade Organization dispute settlement system. In: FUNAG, Gilberto Amado Memorial Lectures, revised and expanded second edition. Brasília, 2012Google Scholar
  7. Lafon JL (1994) La judicialisation de la politique en France. Int Polit Sci Rev 15(2):135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lecourt R (1976) L’Europe des Juges. E. Bruylant, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  9. Weber M (1947) The theory of social and economic organization. Collier-Macmillan Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ministry of Foreign AffairsBrasiliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations