Advertisement

Behavioral Approaches to Language Training for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Jason C. VladescuEmail author
  • Samantha L. Breeman
  • Kathleen E. Marano
  • Jacqueline N. Carrow
  • Alexandra M. Campanaro
  • April N. Kisamore
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Behavior analysis is among the most sought-after early-intervention programs for children with developmental disabilities, with language training being a common primary objective. Many early-intervention programs subscribe to a traditional conceptualization of language skills and focus on developing a robust vocabulary. Conversely, Skinner's (Verbal behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1957) conceptualization of language emphasized the function of an individual’s language use rather than the topography. To assist in understanding Skinner’s conceptualization, this chapter is designed to introduce readers to four elementary verbal operants (i.e., mands, tacts, echoics, and intraverbals). In doing so, we provide a definition for each operant, outline the importance of and specific environmental variables responsible for each, provide some basic guidelines for teaching, and discuss their implications for practitioners.

Keywords

Echoic Intraverbal Mand Tact Verbal behavior 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aguirre, A. A., Valentino, A. L., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2016). Empirical investigations of the intraverbal: 2005–2015. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0064-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert, K. M., Carbone, V. J., Murray, D. D., Hagerty, M., & Sweeney-Kerwin, E. J. (2012). Increasing the mand repertoire of children with autism through the use of an interrupted chain procedure. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allan, A. C., Vladescu, J. C., Kisamore, A. N., Reeve, S. A., & Sidener, T. M. (2015). Evaluating the emergence of reverse intraverbals in children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-014-0025-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Axe, J. B. (2008). Conditional discrimination in the intraverbal relation: A review and recommendations for future research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baer, D. M., Peterson, R. F., & Sherman, J. A. (1967). The development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1967.10-405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belloso-Diaz, C., & Perez-Gonzalez, L. A. (2015). Effect of learning tacts or tacts and intraverbals on the emergence of intraverbals about verbal categorization. The Psychological Record, 65, 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0145-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourret, J., Vollmer, T. R., & Rapp, J. T. (2004). Evaluation of a vocal mand assessment and vocal mand training procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braam, S. J., & Sundberg, M. L. (1991). The effects of specific versus nonspecific reinforcement on verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carroll, R. A., & Klatt, K. P. (2008). Using stimulus-stimulus pairing and direct reinforcement to teach vocal verbal behavior to young children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393062 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll, R. J., & Hesse, B. E. (1987). The effects of mand and tact training on the acquisition of tacts. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cividini-Motta, C., Scharrer, N., & Ahearn, W. H. (2017). An assessment of three procedures to teach echoic responding. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 33, 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0069-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
  15. Dass, T. K., Kisamore, A. N., Vladescu, J. C., Reeve, K. F., & Reeve, S. A. (2018). Teaching children with autism spectrum disorder to tact olfactory stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51(3), 538–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dickes, N. R., & Kodak, T. (2015). Evaluating the emergence of reverse intraverbals following intraverbal training in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Behavioral Interventions, 30, 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (1999). Reduction of stimulus overselectivity with nonverbal differential observing responses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finkel, A. S., & Williams, R. L. (2001). A comparison of textual and echoic prompts on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior in a six-year-old boy with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geiger, K. B., Carr, J. E., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2010). Function-based treatments for escape-maintained problem behavior: A treatment-selection model for practicing behavior analysts. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 3, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gillett, J. N., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2007). Parent-implemented natural language paradigm to increase language and play in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall, G., & Sundberg, M. L. (1987). Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ingvarsson, E. T., & Hollobaugh, T. (2011). A comparison of prompting tactics to establish intraverbals in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 659–664. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-659 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Ingvarsson, E. T., Kramer, R. L., Carp, C. L., Petursdottir, A. I., & Macias, H. (2016). Evaluation of a blocked-trials procedure to establish complex stimulus control over intraverbal responses in children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0071-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ingvarsson, E. T., Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Stephenson, K. M. (2007). An evaluation of intraverbal training to generate socially appropriate responses to novel questions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.40-411 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Kisamore, A. N., Carr, J. E., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2011). Training preschool children to use visual imagining as a problem-solving strategy for complex categorization tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kisamore, A. N., Karsten, A. M., & Mann, C. C. (2016). Teaching multiply controlled intraverbals to children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 826–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kisamore, A. N., Karsten, A. M., Mann, C. C., & Conde, K. A. (2013). Effects of a differential observing response on intraverbal performance of preschool children: A preliminary investigation. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29, 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kodak, T., & Clements, A. (2009). Acquisition of mands and tacts with concurrent echoic training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-839 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. LeBlanc, L. A., & Dillion, C. M. (2009). Establishing mand and tact repertoires. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding (pp. 79–108). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
  31. LeBlanc, L. A., Esch, J., Sidener, T. M., & Firth, A. M. (2006). Behavioral language interventions for children with autism: Comparing applied verbal behavior and naturalistic teaching approaches. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.0007/BF03393026 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Lechago, S. A., Howell, A., Caccavale, M. N., & Peterson, C. W. (2013). Teaching “How?” mand-for-information frames to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 781–791. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.71 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lechago, S. A., & Low, A. I. (2015). A review of the mand-for-information training research literature. International Journal of Behavior Analysis & Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 35–54.Google Scholar
  34. Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: Basic intervention techniques. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  36. Lovaas, O. I., Berberich, J. P., Perloff, B. F., & Schaeffer, B. (1966). Acquisition of imitative speech in schizophrenic children. Science, 151, 705–707. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.151.3711.705 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Marchese, N. V., Carr, J. E., LeBlanc, L. A., Rosati, T. C., & Conroy, S. A. (2012). The effects of the question “what is it?” on tact-training outcomes of children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 539–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. May, R. J., Hawkins, E., & Dymond, S. (2013). Brief report: Effects of tact training on the emergent intraverbal vocal responses in adolescents with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disordrs, 43, 996–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1632-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Michael, J. (1988). Establishing operations and the mand. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 6, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Michael, J. (2007). Verbal behavior. In J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, & W. L. Heward (Eds.), Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed., pp. 525–547). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Miguel, C. F. (2017). The generalization of mands. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 33, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-017-0090-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miguel, C. F., & Kobari-Wright, V. V. (2013). The effects of tact training on the emergence of categorization and listener behavior in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 669–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., & Carr, J. E. (2005). The effects of multiple-tact and receptive-discrimination training on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nigam, R., Schlosser, R. W., & Lloyd, L. L. (2006). Concomitant use of the matrix strategy and the mand-model procedure in teaching graphic symbol combinations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610600650052 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Palmer, D. C. (1991). A behavioral interpretation of memory. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 261–279). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  47. Palmer, D. C. (1996). Achieving parity: The role of automatic reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 289–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Partington, J. W., & Bailey, J. S. (1993). Teaching intraverbal behavior to preschool children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 11, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sautter, R. A., LeBlanc, L. A., Jay, A. A., Goldsmith, T. R., & Carr, J. E. (2011). The role of problem solving in complex intraverbal repertoires. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schlinger, H. D. (1995). A behavior analytic view of child development (pp. 215–242). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  51. Schlinger, H. D. (2008). Listening is behaving verbally. The Behavior Analyst, 31, 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392168 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Shillingsburg, M. A., Hollander, D. L., Yosick, R. N., Bowen, C., & Muskat, L. R. (2015). Stimulus-stimulus pairing to increase vocalizations in children with language delays: A review. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-015-0042-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: The VB-MAPP. Concord, CA: AVB Press.Google Scholar
  55. Sundberg, M. L. (2016). Verbal stimulus control and the intraverbal relation. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0065-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sundberg, M. L., Endicott, K., & Eigenheer, P. (2000). Using intraverbal prompts to establish tacts for children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sundberg, M. L., Loeb, M., Hale, L., & Eigenheer, P. (2002). Contriving establishing operations to teach mands for information. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sundberg, M. L., & Michael, J. (2001). The benefits of skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25(5), 698–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analyst, Inc..Google Scholar
  60. Sundberg, M. L., San Juan, B., Dawdy, M., & Arguelles, M. (1990). The acquisition of tacts, mands, and intraverbals by individuals with traumatic brain injury. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sundberg, M. L., & Sundberg, C. A. (2011). Intraverbal behavior and verbal conditional discriminations in typically developing children and children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tarbox, J., Madrid, W., Aguilar, B., Jacobo, W., & Schiff, A. (2009). Use of chaining to increase complexity of echoics in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 901–906. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-901 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Tsiouri, I., & Greer, R. D. (2007). The role of different social reinforcement contingencies in inducing echoic tacts through motor imitation responding in children with severe language delays. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 4, 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Valentino, A. L., Conine, D. E., Delfs, C. H., & Furlow, C. M. (2015). Use of a modified chaining procedure with textual prompts to establish intraverbal storytelling. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-014-0023-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Vedora, J., & Conant, E. (2015). A comparison of prompting tactics for teaching intraverbals to young adults with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-015-0030-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Vedora, J., & Meunier, L. (2009). Teaching intraverbal behavior to children with autism: A comparison of textual and echoic prompts. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Watkins, C. L., Pack-Teixeira, L., & Howard, J. S. (1989). Teaching intraverbal behavior to severely retarded children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392838 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Williams, G., Donley, C., & Keller, J. (2000). Teaching children with autism to ask questions about hidden objects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 627–630. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2000.33-627 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason C. Vladescu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Samantha L. Breeman
    • 1
  • Kathleen E. Marano
    • 1
  • Jacqueline N. Carrow
    • 1
  • Alexandra M. Campanaro
    • 1
  • April N. Kisamore
    • 2
  1. 1.Caldwell UniversityCaldwellUSA
  2. 2.Hunter CollegeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options