Advertisement

Parent-Child Interaction Therapy for a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Case Study Examining Effects on ASD Symptoms, Social Engagement, Pretend Play, and Disruptive Behavior

  • Corey C. LienemanEmail author
  • Mary M. Ruckle
  • Cheryl B. McNeil
Chapter

Abstract

Recent studies have highlighted the efficacy of PCIT with children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) for decreasing disruptive behavior (Ginn, Clionsky, Eyberg, Warner-Metzger, & Abner, 2017; Zlomke, Jeter, & Murphy, 2017); however, little research has examined the impact of PCIT on social engagement or other symptoms of ASD. The current case study used the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS-3; (Gilliam, 2014), the Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS; Eyberg, Nelson, Ginn, Bhuiyan, & Boggs, 2013), the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI; Eyberg & Pincus, 1999), a social preference assessment, and other novel observational coding schemes. These measures were used to assess the effects of PCIT on child social engagement (i.e., words spoken, eye contact, proximity-seeking, physical touch), pretend play, total ASD symptoms, behavior problems, and caregiver skills, with a child on the autism spectrum. Over the course of treatment, “Charlie,” a 5-year-old Caucasian male, and his mother, showed significant improvements in ECBI Intensity and Problem Scores, caregiver skills, and some measures of child compliance. Observational measures of ASD symptoms demonstrated improvements in pretend play and social engagement (verbalizations, physical touch, and proximity to caregiver). Two other observational measures of social engagement (child eye contact and unique verbalizations) showed potential improvements, but a caregiver-report of total ASD symptoms showed no difference. Results of the study may inform future tailoring or adaptations of PCIT for the unique needs of children with ASD.

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) Social engagement Language ASD symptoms 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank this family for participating in our research and providing permission for the publication of this case study. Although their names and some details have been changed for the purpose of anonymity, “Charlie” and “Mrs. Brown” were delightful to have as participants. They gave generously of their time and energy to complete additional measures and observations, opening their home to our team for several months. We are grateful to the Browns and families like them who work tirelessly and selflessly to improve the lives of children with autism.

References

  1. Baio, J., Wiggins, L., Christensen, D. L., Maenner, M. J., Daniels, J., Warren, Z., … Dowling, N. F. (2018). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries, 67(6), 1–23.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Autism spectrum disorder. Data and statistics. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html
  3. Eyberg, S. M., Nelson, M. M., & Boggs, S. R. (2008). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behavior. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37(1), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410701820117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eyberg, S. M., Nelson, M. M., Ginn, N. C., Bhuiyan, N., & Boggs, S. R. (2013). Dyadic parent-child interaction coding system. In Comprehensive manual for research and training (4th ed.). Gainesville, FL: PCIT International.Google Scholar
  5. Eyberg, S. M., & Pincus, D. (1999). Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory and Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory-Revised (ECBI/SESBI-R) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  6. Eyberg, S. M., & Funderburk, B. W. (2011). Parent–child interaction therapy protocol. Gainesville, FL: PCIT International.Google Scholar
  7. Gilliam, J. E. (2014). Gilliam autism rating scale—Third Edition. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  8. Ginn, N. C., Clionsky, L. N., Eyberg, S. M., Warner-Metzger, C., & Abner, J. (2017). Child-directed interaction training for young children with autism spectrum disorders: Parent and child outcomes. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 46(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1015135 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Green, G. (1996). Early behavioral intervention for autism: What does research tell us? In C. Maurice, G. Green, & S. C. Luce (Eds.), Behavioral intervention for young children with autism: A manual for parents and professionals (pp. 29–44). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  10. Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Masse, J. J., McNeil, C. B., Wagner, S. M., & Chorney, D. B. (2007). Parent-child interaction therapy and high functioning autism: A conceptual overview. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 4(4), 714–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McNeil, C. B., & Hembree-Kigin, T. (2010). Parent-child interaction therapy: Second edition. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zlomke, K. R., Jeter, K., & Murphy, J. (2017). Open-trial pilot of parent-child interaction therapy for children with autism spectrum disorder. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 39(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317107.2016.1267999 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Corey C. Lieneman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mary M. Ruckle
    • 1
  • Cheryl B. McNeil
    • 1
  1. 1.West Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations