Advertisement

Benchmarking City Performance

  • Tan YigitcanlarEmail author
  • Tommi Inkinen
Chapter

Abstract

In the global knowledge economy era, benchmarking urban performance has become a routine practice for many cities. Such exercise is vital for cities to know about their performance and what the competitors are doing and how this performance compares their own. This chapter focuses on the city benchmarking topic and presents an international city comparison study. As the exemplar base city Brisbane, Australia is selected. Brisbane’s knowledge-based urban development performance in numerous areas is benchmarked against global knowledge cities. These cities include Birmingham, Boston, Helsinki, Istanbul, Manchester, Melbourne, San Francisco, Sydney, Toronto, and Vancouver. As for the cross-comparison tool Knowledge-Based Urban Development Assessment Model (KBUD-AM) is utilised.

Keywords

Benchmarking performance Knowledge-based urban development Knowledge city Smart city Sustainable urban development Knowledge-Based Urban Development Assessment Model (KBUD-AM) Brisbane Birmingham Boston Helsinki Istanbul Manchester Melbourne San Francisco Sydney Toronto Vancouver 

References

  1. Carrillo, F. J., Yigitcanlar, T., García, B., & Lönnqvist, A. (2014). Knowledge and the city: Concepts, applications and trends of knowledge-based urban development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Garcia, C., & Leal, M. (2012). The MAKCi index: Using logistic regression modelling for predicting most admired knowledge cities. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 3(1), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Greene, F., Tracey, P., & Cowling, M. (2007). Recasting the city into city-regions: Place promotion, competitiveness benchmarking and the quest for urban supremacy. Growth and Change, 38(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Holloway, A., & Wajzer, C. (2008, October 7–10). Improving city performance through benchmarking. Sydney, Australia: International Cities Town Centres & Communities Society.Google Scholar
  5. Huggins, R. (2010). Regional competitive intelligence. Regional Studies, 44(5), 639–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Luque-Martinez, T., & Munoz-Leiva, F. (2005). City benchmarking. Cities, 22(6), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Malecki, E. (2007). Cities and regions competing in the global economy. Environment and Planning C, 25(1), 638–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rondo-Brovetto, P., & Saliterer, I. (2007). Comparing regions, cities, and communities. The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 12(3), 1–18.Google Scholar
  9. Stokie, T. (1999). Benchmarking Melbourne: Indicators of liveability and competitiveness. In L. Yuan, B. Yuen, & C. Low (Eds.), Urban quality of life: Critical issues and options. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar
  10. The Committee for Sydney. (2016). The seven habits of highly successful cities: Advice for Sydney. Sydney: The Committee for Sydney.Google Scholar
  11. Yigitcanlar, T. (2014a). Position paper: Benchmarking the performance of global and emerging knowledge cities. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(12), 5549–5559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Yigitcanlar, T. (2014b). Valleys, alleys and roundabouts: innovating beyond a precinct. The Conversation. Accessed on March 17, 2017 from http://theconversation.com/valleys-alleys-and-roundabouts-innovating-beyond-a-precinct-24290.
  13. Yigitcanlar, T., & Lönnqvist, A. (2013). Benchmarking knowledge-based urban development performance: Results from the international comparison of Helsinki. Cities, 31(1), 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yigitcanlar, T., & Velibeyoglu, K. (2008). Knowledge-based urban development: The local economic development path of Brisbane, Australia. Local Economy, 23(3), 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Maritime Studies, Brahea CentreUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations