Advertisement

A Security Model for IoT Networks

  • Alban GabillonEmail author
  • Emmanuel Bruno
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11251)

Abstract

The MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport) protocol is becoming the main protocol for the Internet of Things (IoT). In this paper, we define a highly expressive ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control) security model for the MQTT protocol. Our model allows us to regulate not only publications and subscriptions but also distribution of messages to subscribers. We can express various types of contextual security rules, (temporal security rules, content-based security rules, rules based on the frequency of events etc.).

Keywords

Security policy MQTT ABAC IoT First-order logic 

References

  1. 1.
    Gabillon, A., Bruno, E.: Regulating IoT messages. Presented at the 14th International Conference on Information Security Practice and Experience (ISPEC 2018) - Short Paper, Tokyo (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO/IEC 20922:2016 - Information Technology – Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) v3.1.1. https://www.iso.org/standard/69466.html. Accessed 12 Jan 2018
  3. 3.
    Banks, A., Gupta, R.: MQTT Version 3.1.1. OASIS Stand., vol. 29 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neisse, R., Steri, G., Fovino, I.N., Baldini, G.: SecKit: a model-based security toolkit for the internet of things. Comput. Secur. 54, 60–76 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rizzardi, A., Sicari, S., Miorandi, D., Coen-Porisini, A.: AUPS: an open source AUthenticated publish/subscribe system for the internet of things. Inf. Syst. 62, 29–41 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sciancalepore, S., et al.: Attribute-based access control scheme in federated IoT platforms. In: Podnar Žarko, I., Broering, A., Soursos, S., Serrano, M. (eds.) InterOSS-IoT 2016. LNCS, vol. 10218, pp. 123–138. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56877-5_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sicari, S., Rizzardi, A., Miorandi, D., Coen-Porisini, A.: Security towards the edge: sticky policy enforcement for networked smart objects. Inf. Syst. 71, 78–89 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Phung, P.H., Truong, H.-L., Yasoju, D.T.: P4SINC-an execution policy framework for IoT services in the edge. In: 2017 IEEE International Congress on Internet of Things (ICIOT), pp. 137–142 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sicari, S., Rizzardi, A., Miorandi, D., Coen-Porisini, A.: Dynamic policies in internet of things: enforcement and synchronization. IEEE Internet Things J. 4(6), 2228–2238 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, C., Carzaniga, A., Evans, D., Wolf, A.L.: Security issues and requirements for internet-scale publish-subscribe systems. In: 2002 Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS, pp. 3940–3947 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Choi, S., Ghinita, G., Bertino, E.: A privacy-enhancing content-based publish/subscribe system using scalar product preserving transformations. In: Bringas, P.G., Hameurlain, A., Quirchmayr, G. (eds.) DEXA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6261, pp. 368–384. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15364-8_32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yuan, E., Tong, J.: Attributed based access control (ABAC) for web services. In: 2005 Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Web Services, ICWS 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moses, T., et al.: Extensible access control markup language (xacml) version 2.0. Oasis Stand., vol. 200502 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Becker, M.Y., Fournet, C., Gordon, A.D.: SecPAL: design and semantics of a decentralized authorization language. J. Comput. Secur. 18(4), 619–665 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wielemaker, J., Ss, S., Ii, I.: SWI-Prolog 2.7-Reference Manual (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Date, C.J., Darwen, H.: A Guide to the SQL Standard, vol. 3. Addison-Wesley, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horrocks, I., et al.: SWRL: a semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Memb. Submiss. 21, 79 (2004)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    WOW Group, et al.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giaffreda, R.: iCore: a cognitive management framework for the internet of things. In: Galis, A., Gavras, A. (eds.) FIA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7858, pp. 350–352. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38082-2_31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Light, R.: Mosquitto-an open source mqtt v3. 1 broker. URL Httpmosquitto Org (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Han, W., Lei, C.: A survey on policy languages in network and security management. Comput. Netw. 56(1), 477–489 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Birgisson, A., Politz, J.G., Erlingsson, U., Taly, A., Vrable, M., Lentczner, M.: Macaroons: cookies with contextual caveats for decentralized authorization in the cloud. In: NDSS (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jones, M., Bradley, J., Sakimura, N.: JSON web token (JWT) (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Belokosztolszki, A., Eyers, D.M., Pietzuch, P.R., Bacon, J., Moody, K.: Role-based access control for publish/subscribe middleware architectures. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Distributed event-based systems, pp. 1–8 (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Singh, J., Vargas, L., Bacon, J., Moody, K.: Policy-based information sharing in publish/subscribe middleware. In: 2008 IEEE Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, pp. 137–144 (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Sciancalepore, S., Piro, G., Caldarola, D., Boggia, G., Bianchi, G.: OAuth-IoT: an access control framework for the Internet of Things based on open standards. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), pp. 676–681 (2017)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hardt, D.: The OAuth 2.0 authorization framework (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shelby, Z.: Constrained RESTful environments (CoRE) link format. Internet Engineering Task Force IETF, vol. RFC6690 (2012)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hu, Y.C., Patel, M., Sabella, D., Sprecher, N., Young, V.: Mobile edge computing—a key technology towards 5G. ETSI White Pap. 11(11), 1–16 (2015)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pearson, S., Casassa-Mont, M.: Sticky policies: an approach for managing privacy across multiple parties. Computer 44(9), 60–68 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Abadi, M., Feigenbaum, J., Kilian, J.: On hiding information from an oracle. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 195–203 (1987)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Feigenbaum, J.: Encrypting problem instances. In: Williams, H.C. (ed.) CRYPTO 1985. LNCS, vol. 218, pp. 477–488. Springer, Heidelberg (1986).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39799-X_38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wong, W.K., Cheung, D.W., Kao, B., Mamoulis, N.: Secure kNN computation on encrypted databases. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, New York, NY, USA, pp. 139–152 (2009)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhao, Y., Sturman, D.C.: Dynamic access control in a content-based publish/subscribe system with delivery guarantees. In: 26th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS 2006), p. 60 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de la Polynésie FrançaisePunaauia, Faa’aFrench Polynesia
  2. 2.Université de Toulon, CNRS, LIS, UMR 7020La GardeFrance

Personalised recommendations