A Review on Random Forest: An Ensemble Classifier

  • Aakash Parmar
  • Rakesh Katariya
  • Vatsal Patel
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 26)


Ensemble classification is an information mining approach which utilizes various classifiers that cooperate for distinguishing the class label for new unlabeled thing from accumulation. Arbitrary Forest approach joins a few randomized choice trees and totals their forecasts by averaging. It has grabbed well-known attention from the community of research because of its high accuracy and superiority which additionally increase the performance. Now in this paper, we take a gander at improvements of Random Forest from history to till date. Our approach is to take a recorded view on the improvement of this prominently effective classification procedure. To begin with history of Random Forest to main technique proposed by Breiman then successful applications that utilized Random Forest and finally some comparison with other classifiers. This paper is proposed to give non specialists simple access to the principle thoughts of random forest.


  1. 1.
    Fayyad, U.P, Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P.: From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI Mag. 17(3), 37 (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Briem, G.J., Benediktsson, J.A., Sveinsson, J.R.: Multiple classifiers applied to multisource remote sensing data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. 40(10) (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Song, Q., Liu, X., Yang, L.: The random forest classifier applied in droplet fingerprint recognition. In: 2015 12th International Conference on FSKD, pp. 722–726. IEEE, August 2015Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuncheva, L.I., Whitaker, C.J.: Measures of diversity in classifier ensembles and their relationship with the ensemble accuracy. Mach. Learn. 51(2), 181–207 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lam, L., Suen, C.Y.: Application of majority voting to pattern recognition: an analysis of its behavior and performance. IEEE 27(5), 553–568 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shahzad, R.K., Lavesson, N.: Veto-based malware detection. In: 2012 Seventh International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES), pp. 47–54, 20 August 2012Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 55(1), 119–139 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24(2), 123–140 (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dietterich, T.G.: An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: bagging, boosting, and randomization. Mach. Learn. 40(2), 139–157Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aung, W.T., Myanmar, Y., Hla, K.H.: Random forest classifier for multi-category classification of web pages. In: Services Computing Conference. APSCC 2009, pp. 372–376. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Azar, A.T., Elshazly, H.I., Hassanien, A.E., Elkorany, A.M.: A random forest classifier for lymph diseases. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 113(2), 465–473 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pal, M.: Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. IJRS 26(1), 217–222 (2005)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    García, M.N., Herráez, J.C., Barba, M.S., Hernández, F.S.: Random Forest Based Ensemble Classifiers for Predicting Healthcare-Associated Infections in Intensive Care Units. Springer (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SS Agrawal Institue of Engineering and TechnologyNavsariIndia

Personalised recommendations