Advertisement

Abstract

Administering and retaining Quality of Service (QoS) in Mobile Ad-Hoc Network (MANET) is a challenging task due to the autonomous behavior of the nodes. Increasing application demand and end-user support necessitate optimization so as to improve its performance. Prioritizing this requirement, this manuscript proposes a hybrid optimization technique; harmonizing Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) and Fitness Distance Ratio (FDR) based Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to improve QoS. To mitigate the trade-offs in QoS achievement, ACO is focused to maximize network throughput and FDRPSO is directed to attune ACO solution with energy and overhead. The proposed technique is tested in a MANET scenario with 100 mobile nodes and the performance of the network is investigated using throughput, packet delivery ratio, delay, overhead and energy utilization.

Keywords

ACO FDR PSO QoS routing MANET Hybrid optimization 

References

  1. 1.
    Wang, J., Wang, X., Huang, M.: Tabu artificial fish swarm algorithm based intelligent Qos multicast routing algorithm. In: International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, CIS 2008, pp. 56–60 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delavar, A.G., Hoseyny, S., Maghsoudi, R.: Bco-based optimized heuristic strategies for Qos routing. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2, 105–114 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Di Caro, G., Ducatelle, F., Gambardella, L.M.: Swarm intelligence for routing in mobile ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, pp. 76–83. IEEE Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, Z., Kwiatkowska, M.Z., Constantinou, C.: A biologically inspired Qos routing algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks. In: 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, AINA, pp. 426–431. IEEE Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jawhar, I., Wu, J.: Quality of service routing in mobile ad hoc networks. In: Resource Management in Wireless Networking, pp. 65–400. Springer (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chavhan, S., Venkataram, P.: Emergent intelligence based QoS routing in MANET. Procedia Comput. Sci. 52, 659–664 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sarkar, S.K., Basavaraju, T.G., Puttamadappa, C.: AD HOC Mobile Wireless Networks: Principles, Protocols, and Applications. Auerbach Publications (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sharma, M., Kansal, M., Bhatia, T.: Simulation analysis of MANET routing protocols under different mobility model. Int. J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. Technol. 4(1) (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taleb, A.A., Alhmiedat, T., Hassan, O., Turab, N.M.: A survey of sink mobility models for wireless sensor networks. J. Emerg. Trends Comput. Inf. Sci. 4(9), 679–687 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ababneh, N., Labiod, H.: A performance analysis of VANETs routing protocols using different mobility models. In: IEEE International Conference Wireless Communications, Networking and Information Security (WCNIS), pp. 498–502. IEEE Press, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun, B., Pi, S., Gui, C., Zeng, Y., Yan, B., Wang, W., Qin, Q.: Multiple constraints QoS multicast routing optimization algorithm in MANET based on GA. Prog. Nat. Sci. 18(3), 331–336 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang, C.-J., Chuang, Y.T., Hu, K.W.: Using particle swam optimization for QoS in ad-hoc multicast. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 22(8), 1188–1193 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, S.: An ant-based multipath routing algorithm for QoS aware mobile ad-hoc networks. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 66(4), 739–749 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoolimath, P.K.G., Kiran, M., Reddy, G.R.M.: Optimized termite: a bio-inspired routing algorithm for MANETs. In: International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications (SPCOM) (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krishna, P.V., Saritha, V., Vedha, G., Bhiwal, A., Chawla, A.: Quality-of-service enabled ant colony-based multipath routing for mobile ad hoc networks. IET Commun. 6(1), 76 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nivetha, S.K., Asokan, R.: Hybrid ACO-PSO based multi objective optimization for quality of service routing in mobile ad hoc networks. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 9(24), 24651–24668 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mandhare, V., Thool, V., Manthalkar, R.: QoS routing enhancement using meta heuristic approach in mobile ad-hoc network. Comput. Netw. 110, 180–191 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anitha, M., Subramanian, S., Gnanadass, R.: FDR-PSO based optimization for non-smooth functions. Int. Energy J. 10(1), 37–44 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Network simulator NS-2 (2011). http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringAnnamalai UniversityChidambaramIndia

Personalised recommendations