Advertisement

Evaluating Resource Saturation Attack During Controller-Switch Communication in SDN

  • S. SujithaEmail author
  • M. S. K. Manikandan
  • R. Guru Roja
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 26)

Abstract

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is a developing network paradigm that isolates the system’s control (Control plane) from the fundamental switches (Data Plane) and routers and acquainting the capacity of a program to organize operations. The control plane is intelligently brought together and the forwarding plane is rendered easy to follow up on the decisions from the control plane. Especially Controller and switch communication is more vulnerable to attacks by compromising the flow tables in switches. In this paper, we assess the effect of Resource Saturation attacks for various delays and bandwidth in SDN network. Through the evaluation, We highlight the effect of attack for different SDN topologies.

Keywords

SDN controller-switch communication Flow table Flow rules Deployed flows Undeployed flows Network bandwidth 

References

  1. 1.
    Zhao, G., Huang, L., Yu, Z., Xu, H., Wang, P.: On the effect of flow table size and controller capacity on SDN network throughput. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Paris, France, pp. 1–6, May 2017Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kandoi, R., Antikainen, M.: Denial-of-service attacks in OpenFlow SDN networks. In: Proceedings of IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lara, A., Ramamurthy, B.: OpenSec: a framework for implementing security policies using OpenFlow. In: IEEE Globecom Conference, Austin, Texas, USA (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benton, K., Camp, L.J., Small, C.: Openflow vulnerability assessment. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking (HotSDN) (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scott-Hayward, S., O’Callaghan, G., Sezer, S.: SDN security: a survey. In: Future Networks and Services (SDN4FNS), 2013 IEEE SDN, pp. 1–7. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKeown, N., et al.: OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks. In: ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 69–74 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    OpenFlow.org. OpenFlow Switching Reference System. http://www.openflow.org/wp/downloads/
  8. 8.
    Kreutz, D., et al.: Software-defined networking: a comprehensive survey. Proc. IEEE 103(1), 14–76 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Sujitha
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. S. K. Manikandan
    • 2
  • R. Guru Roja
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyThiagarajar College of EngineeringMaduraiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringThiagarajar College of EngineeringMaduraiIndia

Personalised recommendations