Cloud computing has turned into another age innovation that has enormous possibilities in organizations and business environments. Clouds can make it conceivable to get to demands and related information from anyplace. Organizations can lease assets from cloud for capacity and other ciphering purposes so that their framework cost can be diminished fundamentally. Facilitate they can make utilization of all inclusive access to supplications, in view of pay per use service. Consequently for getting singular items there is no license agreement is available. Main drawback of distributed computing is identified and assigned the assets. As a result, asset allotment is performed with the target of limiting the expenses related with it. Alternate difficulties of asset assignments are: taking care of client requests and supplication prerequisites. In this paper, different asset designation techniques and their difficulties are talked about in detail. In my paper provide benefit for both users and asset providers.


Cloud computing Cloud services Asset designation InfraStructure 


  1. 1.
    Singh, A., Korupolu, M., Mohapatra, D.: Server-storage virtualization: integration and load balancing in data centers. In: Proceedings of 2008 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC 2008), pp. 1–12. IEEE Press (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kochut, A., et al.: Desktop workload study with implications for desktop cloud resource optimization. IEEE (2010). ISBN 978-1-4244-6534-7/10Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Inomata, A., Morikawa, T., Ikebe, M., Rahman, S.M.M.: Proposal and evaluation of dynamic asset designation method based on the load of VMs on IaaS. IEEE (2010). ISBN 978-1-4244-8704-2/11Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gmach, D., Roliaand, J., Cherkasova, L.: Satisfying service level objectives in a self-managing resource pool. In: Proceedings of Third IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self Organizing System (SASO 2009), pp. 243–253. IEEE Press (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Irwin, D., Shenoy, P., Cecchet, E., Zink, M.: Resource management in data-intensive clouds: opportunities and challenges. This work is supported in part by NSF under Grant Number CNS-0834243Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shin, D., Akkan, H.: Domain-based virtualized resource management in cloud computingGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Minarolli, D., Freisleben, B.: Utility-based asset designations for virtual machines in cloud computing, pp. 410–417. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Niyato, D., Zhu, K., Wang, P.: Cooperative virtual machine management for multi-organization cloud computing environmentGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wuhib, F., Stadler, R.: Cloud monitoring and resource management for large cloud environments, pp. 970–975. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goudaezi, H., Pedram, M.: Multidimensional SLA-based asset designation for multi-tier cloud computing systems. In: IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing, pp. 324–331 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goudarzi, H., Pedram, M.: Maximizing profit in cloud computing system via asset designation. In: IEEE 31st International Conference on Cloud Computing Systems Workshops, pp. 1–6 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hien, et al.: Automatic virtual resource management for service hosting platforms. In: Cloud 2009, pp. 1–8 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nguyen, H., et al.: SLA-aware virtual resource management for cloud infrastructures. In: IEEE Ninth International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, pp. 357–362 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Popovici, I., et al.: Profitable services in an uncertain world. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Supercomputing (CSC 2005) (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jiyani, et al.: Adaptive asset designation for preemptable jobs in cloud systems, pp. 31–36. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Melendez, J.O., Majumdar, S.: Matchmaking with limited knowledge of resources on clouds and gridsGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim, K.H., et al.: Power-aware provisioning of cloud resources for real time services. In: International Workshop on Middleware for Grids and Clouds and e-Science, pp. 1–6 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar, K., et al.: Asset designation for real time tasks using cloud computing, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keahey, K., et al.: Sky computing. IEEE Internet Comput. 13(5), 43–51 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang, K.-C., Lai, K.-P.: Processor allocation policies for reducing resource fragmentation in multi cluster grid and cloud environments, pp. 971–976. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu, L., Garg, S.K., Buyya, R.: SLA-based asset designation for SaaS provides in cloud computing environments, pp. 195–204. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, L., Tao, J., Kunze, M., Castellanos, A.C., Kramer, D., Karl, W.: High performance computing and communications. In: IEEE International Conference HPCC, pp. 825–830 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rehman, M.S., Sakr, M.F.: Initial findings for provisioning variation in cloud computing, pp. 473–479. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ruth, P., Rhee, J., Xu, D., Kennell, R., Goasguen, S.: Autonomic adaptation of virtual computational environments in a multi-domain infrastructure. In: IEEE International conference on Autonomic Computing, pp. 5–14 (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Endo, P.T., et al.: Asset designation for cloud: concept and research challenges, pp. 42–46. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marshall, P., Keahey, K., Freeman, T.: Elastic site, pp. 43–52. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xiong, P., Chi, Y., Zhu, S., Moon, H.J., Pu, C., Hacigumus, H.: Intelligent management of virtualized resources for database systems in cloud environment, pp. 87–98. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yanggratoke, R., Wuhib, F., Stadler, R.: Gossip-based asset designation for green computing in large clouds. In: 7th International Conference on Network and Service Management, Paris, France, 24–28 October 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ma, R.T.B., Chiu, D.M., Lui, J.C.S., Misra, V., Rubenstein, D.: On resource management for cloud users: a generalized kelly mechanism approachGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Majumdar, S.: Resource management on cloud: handling uncertainties in parameters and policies. CSI Commun. 22, 16–19 (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu, S., Quan, G., Ren, S.: On-line scheduling of real time services for cloud computing. In: World Congress on Services, pp. 459–464 (2010)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wood, T., et al.: Black box and gray box strategies for virtual machine migration. In: Proceedings of 4th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 2007), pp. 229–242 (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Huu, T.T., Montagnat, J.: Virtual asset designations distribution on a cloud infrastructure, pp. 612–617. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Iqbal, W., Dailey, M.N., Ali, I., Janecek, P., Carrera, D.: Adaptive asset designation for back-end mashup supplications on a heterogeneous private cloudGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hu, W., et al.: Multiple job optimization in mapreduce for heterogeneous workloads. In: IEEE Sixth International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grids, pp. 135–140 (2010)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tsai, W.-T., Shao, Q., Sun, X., Elston, J.: Service-oriented cloud computing. In: World Congress on Services, pp. 473–478 (2010)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lin, W.-Y., et al.: Dynamic auction mechanism for cloud asset designation. In: 2010 IEEE/ACM 10th International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing, pp. 591–592 (2010)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhu, X., et al.: Integrated capacity and workload management for the next generation data center. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Automatic Computing (ICAC 2008), pp. 172–181. IEEE Press (2008)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lu, X., Lin, J., Zha, L., Xu, Z.: Vega LingCloud: a resource single leasing point system to support heterogenous supplication modes on shared infrastructure, pp. 99–106. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang, X., et al.: Design and implementation of adaptive resource co-allocation approaches for cloud service environments. In: IEEE 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 484–488 (2010)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    You, X., Xu, X., Wan, J., Yu, D.: AAS-M: asset designation strategy based on market mechanism in cloud computing, pp 256–263. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lee, Y.C., et al.: Project driven service request scheduling in clouds. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Cluster & Grid Computing (CC Grid 2010) Melbourne, Australia (2010)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yang, Y., et al.: A profile based approach to just in time scalability for cloud supplications. In: IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, pp. 9–16 (2009)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kong, Z., et al.: Mechanism design for stochastic virtual asset designation in non-cooperative cloud systems. In: 2011 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing, pp. 614–621 (2011)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chen, Z., Yoon, J.P.: International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing, pp. 250–257. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ITKalasalingam Institute of TechnologyKrishnankoilIndia
  2. 2.Department of CSEKalasalingam Institute of TechnologyKrishnankoilIndia

Personalised recommendations