Advertisement

Abstract

To make the urban areas greener, more secure, and more effective, Internet of Things (IoT) can assume a critical part. Change in security and personal satisfaction can be accomplished by interfacing gadgets, vehicles and foundation all around in a city. Best innovative arrangements can be accomplished in Smart cities by making distinctive partners to cooperate. Framework integrators, arranged administrators and innovation suppliers have a part to play in working with governments to empower savvy arrangements. However, building such arrangements on an open, standard-based interchanges stage that can be persistently utilized is a test. In this paper, we likewise present another type of grocery store: Smart Super Market, in which clients can procure itemized item data with Smart general store’s offices and facilitate the checkout procedure less demanding than previously. We show a waste gathering administration arrangement in light of giving knowledge to squander canisters, utilizing an IoT model with sensors. It can read, gather, and transmit tremendous volume of information over the Internet, and utilizes that to make the city clean.

Keywords

Smart super market Internet of Things Smart waste bins 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the IOT lab, NSS College of Engineering, Palakkad, for the assistance given during the conduct of the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Xu, G., Cao, Y., Ren, Y., Li, X., Feng, Z.: Network security situation awareness based on semantic ontology and user-defined rules for Internet of Things. IEEE Access (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wortmann, F., Flüchter, K.: Internet of Things. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57(3), 221–224 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hänisch, T., Rogge, S.: Industries 4.0. In: IT-Sicherheit in der Industrie 4.0. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbade, pp. 91–98 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sadeghi, A.R., Wachsmann, C., Waidner, M.: Security and privacy challenges in industrial Internet of Things. In: Proceedings of 2015 52nd Annual Design Automation Conference, pp. 1–6 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu, X., Yang, T., Yan, B.: Internet of Things for wildlife monitoring. In: IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China—Workshops (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of Things (IOT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gen. Comput. Syst. 29(7), 1645–1660 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caceres, R., Friday, A.: Ubicomp systems at 20: progress, opportunities, and challenges. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 11(1), 14–21 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schirner, G., Erdogmus, D., Chowdhury, K., Padir, T.: The future of human-in-the-loop cyber-physical systems. Computer 46(1), 36–45 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stankovic, J.A.: Research directions for the Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Things 1(1), 14–21 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abdelwahab, S., Hamdaoui, B., Guizani, M., Rayes, A.: Enabling smart cloud services through remote sensing: an internet of everything enabler. IEEE Internet Things 1(3), 276–288 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Liu, C.H., Compton, M., Christen, P., Georgakopoulos, D.: Sensor search techniques for sensing as a service architecture for the Internet of Things. IEEE Sens. 14(2), 406–420 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fang, W., et al.: On the throughput-energy tradeoff for data transmission in IoT devices. J. Inf. Sci. 283(1), 79–93 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mashayekhy, L., et al.: Incentive-compatible online mechanism for resource management. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Alaska, USA, pp. pp. 56–61. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duan, Q., et al.: A survey on service-oriented network virtualization towards convergence of networking and IoT. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 9(4), 373–392 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shyam, G.K., Manvi, S.S.: Virtual resource prediction in cloud computing: a Bayesian approach. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 65(1), 44–55 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roussos, G., College, B.: Enabling RFID in retail. IEEE Comput. 39(3), 25–30 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kourouthanassis, P., Roussos, G.: Developing consumer friendly pervasive retail systems. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2(2), 32–39 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garfinkel, S.L., Juels, A., Pappu, R.: RFID privacy: an overview of problems and proposed solutions. IEEE Secur. Priv. 3(3), 34–43 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bhattacharya, M., Chu, C.H., Mullen, T.: A comparative analysis of RFID adoption in retail and manufactural sectors. In: IEEE International Conference on RFID, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 241–249 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boeck, H.: RFID Through water and on metal with 99.9% reliability (episode 015). RFID Interview and RFID Technology. RFID Radio (2008). http://www.rfidradio.com/?p=26

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and CommunicationNSS College of EngineeringPalakkadIndia
  2. 2.NSS College of EngineeringPalakkadIndia

Personalised recommendations