Advertisement

Trends of post-Cold War Autocratization

  • Andrea CassaniEmail author
  • Luca Tomini
Chapter
Part of the Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century book series (CDC)

Abstract

What prevailing forms does autocratization take in the post-Cold War period? In this chapter, the authors engage in the empirical analysis of post-Cold War processes of autocratization. Based on the analytical framework elaborated in the previous chapter of this book, the authors identify a global sample of autocratization episodes occurred between 1990 and 2015, and map geographical and historical trends. The analysis confirms that autocratization represents an increasingly relevant political phenomenon, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, Asia and the post-communist world. Post-Cold War autocratization takes four main forms, namely, transitions from liberal democracy to defective democracy; from defective democracy to electoral autocracy; from defective democracy to closed autocracy; and from electoral autocracy to closed autocracy. Moreover, autocratization tends to take different forms in different regions, and to “evolve” through time.

Keywords

Autocratization post-Cold War Measurement Regional trends Historical trends 

References

  1. Bogaards, M. (2010). Measures of democratization: From degree to type to war. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 475–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carbone, G., & Cassani, A. (2016). Nigeria and democratic progress by elections in Africa. Africa Spectrum, 51(3), 53–69.Google Scholar
  3. Diamond, L. (2008). The democratic rollback: The resurgence of the predatory state. Foreign Affairs, 87, 36.Google Scholar
  4. Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doorenspleet, R. (2005). Democratic transitions: Exploring the structural sources of the fourth wave. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  6. Geddes, B., Wright, J., & Frantz, E. (2014). Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hadenius, A., & Teorell, J. (2007). Pathways from authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heydemann, S., & Leenders, R. (2011). Authoritarian learning and authoritarian resilience: Regime responses to the Arab awakening. Globalization, 8(5), 647–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huntington, S. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Oklahoma City: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  10. Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2015). The myth of democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mechkova, V., Luehrmann, A., & Lindberg, S. (2017). How much democratic backsliding? Journal of Democracy, 28(4), 162–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Merkel, W. (2004). Embedded and defective democracies. Democratization, 11(5), 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Merkel, W. (2010). Are dictatorships returning? Revisiting the “democratic rollback” hypothesis. Contemporary Politics, 16(1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. C., & Whitehead, L. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: Latin America (Vol. 2). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Plattner, M. (2014). The end of the transitions era? Journal of Democracy, 25(3), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schmitter, P. (2015). Crisis and transition, but not decline. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tull, D., & Simons, C. (2017). The institutionalisation of power revisited: Presidential term limits in Africa. Africa Spectrum, 52(2), 79–102.Google Scholar
  18. Wahman, M., Teorell, J., & Hadenius, A. (2013). Authoritarian regime types revisited: Updated data in comparative perspective. Contemporary Politics, 19(1), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social and Political SciencesUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Political SciencesUniversité Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations