A New World Order?

  • Aisha K. GillEmail author
  • Nazneen Ahmed
Part of the Gender and Politics book series (GAP)


The implications of Brexit for women have been a source of discussion, speculation and thoughtful academic analysis among feminist legal scholars, in particular, since calls for the referendum began. In this article, we examine Brexit’s specific impact on the lives of black and minority ethnic (BME) women, who, in the immediate aftermath of the referendum result, became the focus of an outpouring of racist and Islamophobic attacks and assaults. We examine this impact through two prose–poetic creative pieces written by us as British Asian authors. We argue that using creative methods allows us to represent and reflect upon Brexit in all its contradictory multiplicities. Such methods also enable us to view Brexit’s consequences using an intersectional feminist lens, and thus consider the effect Brexit is having, and will continue to have, on gender, race, religion and class relations.


  1. Atkins, C. 2016. British Far Right Celebrates Brexit Vote, Trump Offers Congratulations. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  2. Birch, S. 2016. Our New Voters: Brexit, Political Mobilisation and the Emerging Electoral Cleavage. Juncture: The Institute for Public Policy Research 23 (2): 107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bock, P. 2017. Brexit Activist Gina Miller: I Never Expected This Much Racist Abuse. March 10. Accessed 15 Mar 2018.
  4. Bulman, M. 2017. Brexit Vote Sees Highest Spike in Religious and Racial Hate Crimes Ever Recorded. The Independent, July 7. Accessed 15 Mar 2018.
  5. Cain, R. 2016. Post-truth and the ‘Metropolitan Elite’ Feminist: Lessons from Brexit. Feminists@Law 6 (1): 1–8. Accessed 13 Mar 2018.
  6. Casalicchio, E. 2016. Theresa May: Britain Wants a Red, White and Blue Brexit. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  7. Coulter, S., and B. Hancké. 2016. A Bonfire of the Regulations, or Business as Usual? The UK Labour Market and the Political Economy of Brexit. Accessed 15 Mar 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duff, A. 2016. Article 50: How to Leave the European Union. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  9. Gill, A.A. 2016. AA Gill Argues the Case Against Brexit. The Times, June 12. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  10. Guerrina, R., and H. Murphy. 2016. Strategic Silences in the Brexit Debate: Gender, Marginality and Governance. Journal of Contemporary European Research 12 (4): 873–880.Google Scholar
  11. Gupta, R. 2017. Brexit: Where Were Women’s Voices? July 2. Accessed 15 Mar 2018.
  12. Hozić, A., and J. True. 2017. Brexit as a Scandal: Gender and Global Trumpism. Review of International Political Economy 24 (2): 270–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hubolt, S. 2016. The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (9): 1259–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Inglehart, Ronald F., and Pippa Norris. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  15. Kara, H. 2015. Creative Research Methods in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kent, A. 2016. Political Cartography: From Bertin to Brexit. The Cartographic Journal 53 (3): 199–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewis, H. 2016. Brexit Is a Feminist Issue. The Guardian, March 20. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.
  18. Lucas, C. 2016. ‘White Men in Grey Suits’ Dominating EU Debate, Says Caroline Lucas. The Guardian, January 27. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.
  19. Mannay, D. 2016. Visual, Narrative and Creative Research Methods: Application, Reflection and Ethics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Millns, S. n.d. What Does Brexit Mean for Women? Accessed 11 Mar 2018.
  21. Onions, I. 2016. European Referendum Result: Bristol Votes by Large Majority to Remain in European Union. Accessed 15 Mar 2018.
  22. Pettifor, A. 2016. Brexit and Its Consequences. Globalizations: 127–132. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  23. Rajan-Rankin, S. 2017. Brexit Logics: Myth and Fact—A Black Feminist Analysis. Feminists@Law 7 (2): 1–2. Accessed 11 Mar 2018.
  24. Rawlinson, K. 2017. Viscount Jailed for Offering Money for Killing of Gina Miller. The Guardian, July 13. Accessed March 21, 2018.
  25. Rinehart, R. 1998. Fictional Methods in Ethnography: Believability, Specks of Glass, and Chekhov. Qualitative Inquiry 4 (2): 200–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rose, A. 2016. Why Estimates of the Trade Effects of the Eurozone Vary so Much. Accessed 23 Dec 2016.
  27. Sampson, F., A.K. Gill, and M. Arshi. 2017. Women on Brexit. Poem: International English Language Quarterly 5 (2–3): 148–160.Google Scholar
  28. Tell MAMA. 2017. 2016 Annual Report: A Constructed Threat: Identity, Intolerance and the Impact of Anti-Muslim Hatred. London: Faith Matters.Google Scholar
  29. Wallace, H. 2016. Heading for the Exit: the United Kingdom’s Troubled Relationship with the European Union. Journal of Contemporary European Research 12 (4): 809–815.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesUniversity of RoehamptonLondonUK
  2. 2.UCL Department of GeographyLondonUK

Personalised recommendations