Advertisement

The Likely Economic Impact of Brexit on Women: Lessons from Gender and Trade Research

  • Mary-Ann StephensonEmail author
  • Marzia Fontana
Chapter
Part of the Gender and Politics book series (GAP)

Abstract

Brexit will mean new trading arrangements for the UK, not just with the EU but with the rest of the world. It is well established that trade agreements can have significantly different impacts on different groups of women and men as a result of differences in economic position, caring responsibilities and political power. With continued uncertainty about what trade agreement the UK will reach with the EU, and therefore what trade agreements with the rest of the world will be possible and/or necessary it is difficult to predict with certainty what these gendered impacts might be. One commonly used framework to assess the gendered impacts of trade agreements focusses on the implications of trade agreements for employment, for consumption and for the provision of public services. Using this model this chapter will explore the key gender issues to consider when analysing the eventual trade agreements made by the UK.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article draws on the findings of the WBG report Exploring the Economic Impact of Brexit on Women, Women’s Budget Group, by Helen Mott with Mary-Ann Stephenson and Marzia Fontana, available online at: https://wbg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Economic-Impact-of-Brexit-on-women-briefing-FINAL.pdf.

Bibliography

  1. Allegretti, A. 2016. Open Britain Exposes All the Times Brexiteers Promised We Wouldn’t Leave the Single Market. Huffington Post, November 17. Available online at: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/open-britain-video-single-market-nigel-farage-anna-soubry_uk_582ce0a0e4b09025ba310fce.
  2. Andriescu, M., and L. Giles. 2017. Could a Bad Brexit Deal Reduce Workers’ Rights Across Europe? Work Foundation. https://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/TUC_BrexitWorkersRights.pdf.
  3. Balakrishnan, R., and D. Elson. 2011. Economic Policy and Human Rights: Holding Governments to Account. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  4. BBC News Website. 2016a. Reality Check: Would Brexit Mean Extra £350m a Week for NHS? April 15. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36040060.
  5. BBC News Website. 2016b. Belgium Split Over EU-Canada Trade Deal Ceta, October 18. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-37688942.
  6. BBC News Website. 2017. Brexit: David Davis Wants ‘Canada Plus Plus Plus’ Trade Deal, December 10. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-42298971.
  7. Begg, I., and F. Mushovel. 2016. The Economic Impact of Brexit: Jobs, Growth and the Public Finances. Briefing Paper, LSE. Available online at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/67008/1/Hearing-11—The-impact-of-Brexit-on-jobs-and-economic-growth-sumary.pdf.
  8. Berik, G. 2011. Gender Aspects of Trade. In Trade and Employment: From Myths to Facts, ed. M. Jansen. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  9. Buchan, L. 2017. Theresa May Hits Back at EU Over Bespoke Brexit Deal. Independent, December 19. Available online at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-eu-talks-michel-barnier-brexit-deal-city-london-bespoke-trade-a8118511.html.
  10. Bunyan, D., J. Longworth, and M. Page. 2017. The Making of Feminist Democracy in a Brexit Environment. Symposium: Strengthening Gender Equality in Post-Brexit Britain, June 20. University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  11. Callanan, M. 2012. Speech in a Debate on the Outcome of the February 2012 EU Summit, February 14. Available online at: http://ecrgroup.eu/martin-callanan-mep-speech-in-a-debate-on-the-outcome-of-the-february-2012-eu-summit/.
  12. CEBR. 2017. The Economic Impact on Services from the UK Losing Single Market Access a Cebr Report for Open Britain. Available online at: https://www.cebr.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Open-Britain_services-report.pdf.
  13. Chilcott, A. 2018. Gendering Brexit: The Role and Concerns of Feminists and Women’s Rights Organisations in the UK, Gender 5+, Brussels. Available online at: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/530efa_daf3572829014d2c81997f735f79a0b3.pdf.
  14. Danesckhu, S. 2017. Migrant Labour Shortage Leaves Fruit Rotting on UK Farms. Financial Times, November 3. https://www.ft.com/content/13e183ee-c099-11e7-b8a3-38a6e068f464.
  15. DAPHNE. 2014. Justice Programmes (2007–2013). Available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/grants1/programmes-2007-2013/index_en.htm.
  16. De Henau, J., S. Himmelweit, Z. Łapniewska, and D. Perrons. 2016. Investing in the Care Economy: A Gender Analysis of Employment Stimulus in Seven OECD Countries. Report by the UK Women’s Budget Group for the International Trade Union Confederation, Brussels. Available online at: https://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/care_economy_en.pdf.
  17. Dhingra, S., G. Ottaviano, T. Sampson, and J. Van Reenen. 2016a. The UK Treasury Analysis of ‘The Long-Term Economic Impact of EU Membership and the Alternatives’. CEP Commentary. Available online at: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/brexit04.pdf.
  18. Dhingra, S., and G. Ottaviano, et al. 2016b. The Consequences of Brexit for UK Trade and Living Standards. LSE Centre for Economic Performance. http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/brexit02.pdf.
  19. Ebell, M., and J. Warren. 2016. The Long Term Economic Impact of Leaving the EU. National Institute Economic Review 236 (1): 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eilis, J., R. Pearson, B. Phipps, S. Rai, S. Smethers, and D. Tepe-Belfrag. 2016. Towards a New Deal For Care and Carers Report of the PSA Commission on Care, PSA. Available online at: http://www.commissiononcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Web-Care-Comission-Towards-a-new-deal-for-care-and-carers-v1.0.pdf.
  21. Emmerson, C., and P. Johnson, et al. 2016. Brexit and the UK’s Public Finances. IFS Report 116. https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/comms/r116.pdf.
  22. Eurostat. 2017. International Trade in Services, June. Available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/International_trade_in_services.
  23. Fahy, N., T. Hervey, S. Greer, H. Jarman, D. Stuckler, M. Glasworthy, and M. McKee. 2017. How Will Brexit Affect Health and Health Services in the UK? Evaluating Three Possible Scenarios. The Lancet 390 (10107): 2110–2118. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)31926-8/fulltext.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fontana, M. 2003. The Gender Effects of Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries: A Review of the Literature. Sussex Discussion Paper in Economics DP101, republished in Bussolo, M., and de Hoyos, R.E. 2009. Gender Aspects of the Trade and Poverty Nexus: A Macro-Micro Approach. Washington, DC: Palgrave and McMillan for the World Bank.Google Scholar
  25. Fontana, M. 2016. Gender Equality in Trade Agreements. European Parliament. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/571388/IPOL_STU(2016)571388_EN.pdf.
  26. Food Standards Agency. 2017. The Food and You Survey. https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/food-and-you-w4-exec-summary.pdf.
  27. Ford, M. 2016. Workers’ Rights from Europe: The Impact of Brexit. Legal Opinion, TUC. https://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/Brexit%20Legal%20Opinion.pdf.
  28. Fritz, T. 2015. Public Services Under Attack: TTIP, CETA, and the Secretive Collusion Between Business Lobbyists and Trade Negotiators, AITEC. Available online at: https://www.tni.org/en/publication/public-services-under-attack-0.
  29. Gammage, S., H. Jorgensen, E. McGill, and M. White. 2002. Trade Impact Review. Washington, DC: Women’s Edge Coalition.Google Scholar
  30. Gasiorek, M., P. Holmes, and J. Rollo. 2016. UK-EU Trade Relations Post Brexit: Too Many Red Lines? UK Trade Policy Observatory, Briefing Paper 5, University of Sussex. Available online at: http://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/uktpo/files/2017/01/Briefing-paper-5-Final.pdf.
  31. Guardian. 2016. Theresa May Calls for ‘Red, White and Blue Brexit’, December 6. Available online at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/dec/06/theresa-may-calls-for-red-white-and-blue-brexit.
  32. HM Treasury. 2016. HM Treasury Analysis: The Long-Term Economic Impact of EU Membership and the Alternatives. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/517415/treasury_analysis_economic_impact_of_eu_membership_web.pdf.
  33. Holmes, P. 2017. Trade and Consumers After Brexit. UK Trade Policy Briefing Paper 12. Available online at: http://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/uktpo/publications/trade-and-consumers-after-brexit/.
  34. House of Commons Library. 2017a. Importance of Trade with the EU for UK Industries, House of Commons Library Research Publications. Available online at: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8065#fullreport.
  35. House of Commons Library. 2017b. CETA: The EU-Canada Free Trade Agreement, House of Commons Library Research Publications. Available online at: http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7492/CBP-7492.pdf.
  36. ILO. 2017. World Economic and Social Outlook. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  37. Johnston, I. 2016. ‘TTIP on Steroids’: Campaigners Warn Post-Brexit UK Faces ‘Disastrous’ Trade Deal with US. Independent, June 24. Available online at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ttip-brexit-uk-steroids-disastrous-global-justice-now-war-on-want-a7099986.html.
  38. Kan, M., and H. Laurie. 2010. Savings, Investments, Debts and Psychological Well-Being in Married and Cohabiting Couples. Institute for Social and Economic Research. Available online at: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/files/iser_working_papers/2010-42.pdf.
  39. Kucera, D., and W. Milberg. 2007. Gender Segregation and Gender Bias in Manufacturing Trade Expansion: Revising the “Wood Asymmetry”. In The Feminist Economics of Trade, ed. I. van Steveren, D. Elson, C. Grown, and N. Cagatay. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Labour List. 2018. Backbenchers Hope New Poll Will Trigger Corbyn Shift on Single Market, January 22. Available online at: https://labourlist.org/2018/01/backbenchers-hope-new-poll-will-trigger-corbyn-shift-on-single-market/.
  41. Levell, P., M. O’Connell, and K. Smith. 2017. How Might Brexit Affect Food Prices? IFS. Available online at: https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/9562.
  42. Lipman, M. 2016. Brexit and Consumer Rights: What Will Life Be Like for Consumers After Brexit? Citizens Advice Blog. https://blogs.citizensadvice.org.uk/blog/brexit-and-consumer-rights-what-will-life-be-like-for-consumers-after-brexit/.
  43. Malmstrom and Freeland. 2016. Joint Statement Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), bu EU Commissioner for Trade Cecilia Malmström and the Honourable Chrystia Freeland, Minister of International Trade of Canada, February 29. Available online at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/february/tradoc_154330.pdf.
  44. Mason, R. 2018. Jeremy Corbyn Insists UK Cannot Remain in Single Market After Brexit. Guardian, January 8. Available online at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jan/08/jeremy-corbyn-eu-single-market-after-brexit.
  45. May, T. 2016. Speech to Conservative Party Conference, October 5. Available online at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/05/theresa-mays-conference-speech-in-full/.
  46. Mott, H. 2016. The Economy. In the British Council Report: Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women and Girls in the UK. Available online at: https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/gender_equality_and_empowerment_in_the_uk.pdf.
  47. OBR. 2017. Office for Budget Responsibility: Economic and Fiscal Outlook, HM Treasury. Available online at: http://cdn.budgetresponsibility.org.uk/Nov2017EFOwebversion-2.pdf.
  48. O’Grady, S. 2018. Brexicon: A Full Dictionary of Brexit-Related Jargon. Independent, February 21. Available online at: https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/brexit-hard-soft-boris-johnson-theresa-may-article-50-brexchosis-a8221566.html.
  49. OECD. 2017. The Missing Entrepreneurs 2017: Policies for Inclusive Entrepreneurship. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264283602-en.
  50. ONS. 2017a. Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings: 2017 Provisional and 2016 Revised Results. Available online at: http://bit.ly/2zGaZrV.
  51. Pearson, R. 1999. ‘Nimble Fingers’ Revisited: Reflections on Women and Third World Industrialisation in the Late Twentieth Century. In Feminist Visions of Development, ed. C. Jackson and R. Pearson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Peck, T. 2017. Brexit: Food Standards Agency Should Be Able to Say No to Chlorinated Chicken. The Independent, July 31. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-chlorinated-chicken-food-standards-agency-no-ban-imports-food-us-fsa-a7869561.html.
  53. Rees-Mogg, J. 2017. Speech at the Launch of Economists for Free Trade’s Budget for Brexit Report, November 14. Available online at: https://www.economistsforfreetrade.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/EFT-Budget-for-Brexit-Jacob-Rees-Mogg-speech.pdf.
  54. RBS website. (2016), NatWest Research Finds Women See More Barriers to Entrepreneurship, September 14. https://www.rbs.com/rbs/news/2016/09/natwest-research-finds-women-see-more-barriers-to-entrepreneursh.html.
  55. Sampson, T., D. Swati, G. Ottaviano, and J. Van Reene. 2016. Economists for Brexit: A Critique, LSE Centre for Economic Performance. Available online at: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/brexit06.pdf.
  56. Serdan-Rosales, A., and C. Salas. 2011. Trade Policy and Human Rights: Mexico. In Economic Policy and Human Rights: Holding Governments to Account, ed. R. Balakrishnan and D. Elson. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  57. Sinclair, S. 2015. Trade Agreements and Progressive Governance. In Critical Perspectives on the Crisis of Global Governance, ed. S. Gill. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. Starmer, K. 2017. No ‘Constructive Ambiguity’. Labour Will Avoid Brexit Cliff Edge for UK Economy. The Observer, August 26. Available online at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/26/keir-starmer-no-constructive-ambiguity-brexit-cliff-edge-labour-will-avoid-transitional-deal.
  59. Statistica. 2018. Motor Vehicle Ownership in the United Kingdom (UK) 2017, by Gender, Survey Data. Available online at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/682605/consumers-who-own-a-motor-vehicle-in-the-united-kingdom-uk-by-gender/.
  60. TUC. 2015. Stop CETA, TTIP’s Dangerous Cousin, TUC Campaigns. Available at: https://campaign.goingtowork.org.uk/petitions/stop-ceta-ttip-s-dangerous-cousin.
  61. TUC. 2016. Taking the Temperature of the Post-Brexit Economy: Britain’s Economic Prospects After Leaving the EU. Trades Union Congress. Available online at: https://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/Post-BrexitEconomy.pdf.
  62. UKTPO. 2017. ‘With or Without EU’—Priorities for the UK’s Four Trading Nations Post Brexit, UK Trade Policy Observatory, University of Sussex. Available online at: https://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/uktpo/2017/03/29/with-or-without-eu-priorities-for-the-uks-four-trading-nations-post-brexit/.
  63. UN Women. 2015. Progress of the World’s Women 2015–2016. New York: United Nations. Available online at: http://progress.unwomen.org/en/2015/pdf/UNW_progressreport.pdf.
  64. WBG. 2017. Intersecting Inequalities: The Impact of Austerity on BME Women, Women’s Budget Group and Runnymede Trust. Available online at: https://www.intersecting-inequalities.com/.
  65. WBG. 2018. Exploring the Economic Impact of Brexit on Women, Women’s Budget Group. Available online at: https://wbg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Economic-Impact-of-Brexit-on-women-briefing-FINAL.pdf.
  66. Williams, M. 2007. Gender Issues in the Multilateral Trading System. In The Feminist Economics of Trade, ed. I. van Staveren, D. Elson, C. Grown, and N. Cagatay. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LondonUK
  2. 2.Institute of Development Studies at SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations