Advertisement

Brexit and the Work–Family Conflict: A Scottish Perspective

  • Michelle Weldon-JohnsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Gender and Politics book series (GAP)

Abstract

This paper examines the Scottish Government’s desire to maintain ties with EU law post-Brexit in the context of employment and equality law, particularly those laws which impact on work-family conflict. The paper critically examines whether there is, or could be, a distinctly Scottish perspective in the context of work-family rights post-Brexit. The paper frames the analysis by considering the potentially gendered implications of Brexit in this context. In doing so, it examines this issue from the perspective of traditional heterosexual dual-partnered working family models. It is argued that rights for working fathers will be most vulnerable post-Brexit, with related consequences for working mothers. Consequently, the implications of Brexit in this context are primarily viewed through the lens of working fathers. The paper then critically examines the Scottish Government’s position on EU employment and equality law in the post-Brexit context.

Bibliography

  1. Aitkenson, J. 2017. Shared Parental Leave in the UK: Can It Advance Gender Equality By Changing Fathers Into Co-Parents? International Journal of Law in Context 13 (3): 356–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnard, C. 2016. Oral Evidence to the Women and Equalities Committee. Impact of Brexit on Gender, HC 657 14, September.Google Scholar
  3. Beecroft, A. 2011. Report on Employment Law. URN 12/825.Google Scholar
  4. Blum, S., Koslowski, A., and Moss, P. 2017. International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2017. http://www.leavenetwork.org/lp_and_r_reports/.
  5. Busby, N. 2017. Equality Law, Brexit and Devolution. Employment Law Bulletin 142: 4–7.Google Scholar
  6. Bruce, F., and Lord Farmer. 2017. Strengthening Families Manifesto: Policies for a Conservative Government to Strengthen Families.Google Scholar
  7. Caracciolo di Torella, E. 2000. A Critical Assessment of the EC Legislation Aimed at Reconciling Work and Family Life: Lessons from the Scandinavian Model? In Legal Regulation of the Employment Relation, ed. H. Collins, P. Davies, and R. Rideout. London: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  8. Caracciolo di Torella, E. 2007. New Labour, New Dads—The Impact of Family Friendly Legislation on Fathers. Industrial Law Journal 36 (3): 318–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caracciolo di Torella, E. 2014. Brave New Fathers for a Brave New World? Fathers as Caregivers in an Evolving European Union. European Law Journal 20 (1): 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caracciolo di Torella, E. 2015. Men in the Work/Family Reconciliation Discourse: The Swallows That Did Not Make a Summer? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 37 (3): 334–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caracciolo di Torella, E. 2017. An Emerging Right to Care in the EU: A “New Start to Support Work-Life Balance for Parents and Carers”. ERA Forum 18: 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caracciolo di Torella, E., and P. Foubert. 2015. Surrogacy, Pregnancy and Maternity Rights: A Missed Opportunity for a More Coherent Regime of Parental Rights in the EU. European Law Review 40: 52–69.Google Scholar
  13. Caracciolo di Torella, E., and A. Masselot. 2001. Pregnancy, Maternity and the Organisation of Family Life: An Attempt to Classify the Case Law of the Court of Justice. European Law Review 26 (3): 239–260.Google Scholar
  14. Collier, R. 1995. Masculinity, Law and the Family. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Collier, R. 1999. ‘Feminising’ the Workplace? Law, the ‘Good Parent’ and the ‘Problem of Men.’ In Feminist Perspective on Employment Law, ed. Anne Morris and Thérèse O’Donnell. London: Cavendish. Google Scholar
  16. Collier, R. 2001. A Hard Time to Be a Father? Reassessing the Relationship Between Law, Policy, and Family (Practices). Journal of Law and Society 28 (4): 520–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collier, R. 2010. Men, Law and Gender: Essays on the ‘Man’ of Law. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Collier, R., and S. Sheldon. 2008. Fragmenting Fatherhood: A Socio-Legal Study. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Crompton, R. 1999. Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dermott, E. 2001. New Fatherhood in Practice?—Parental Leave in the UK. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 21 (4–6): 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dermott, E. 2005. Time and Labour: Fathers’ Perceptions of Employment and Childcare. Sociological Review, 53: 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dickens, L. 2014. The Coalition Government’s Reforms to Employment Tribunals and Statutory Employment Rights—Echoes of the Past. Industrial Relations Journal 45 (3): 234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Department of Trade and Industry. 2003. Balancing Work and Family: Enhancing Choice and Support for Parents. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  24. Department of Trade and Industry. 2005. Work and Families: Choice and Flexibility, A Consultation Document. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  25. Ellis, E. 1991. European Community Sex Equality Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fawcett Society. 2018. Sex Discrimination Law Review. London: Fawcett Society.Google Scholar
  27. Ford, M. 2016. Legal Advice to the TUC: Workers’ Rights from Europe: The Impact of Brexit.Google Scholar
  28. Foubert, P. 2017. Child Care Leave 2.0—Suggestions for the Improvement of the EU Maternity and Parental Leave Directives from a Rights Perspective. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 24 (2): 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fineman, M. 1995. The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. New York: Routledge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fredman, S. 2014. Reversing Roles: Bringing Men into the Frame. International Journal of Law in Context 10 (4): 442–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gornick, J.C., and M.K. Meyers. 2003. Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  32. Guerrina, R., and A. Masselot. 2018. Walking into the Footprint of EU Law: Unpacking the Gendered Consequences of Brexit. Social Policy and Society: 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746417000501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hepple, B. 2013. Back to the Future: Employment Law Under the Coalition Government. Industrial Law Journal 42 (3): 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. HC Women and Equalities Committee. 2016b. Gender Pay Gap Report. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmselect/cmwomeq/584/58402.htm. Accessed 18 May 2018.
  35. HC Women and Equalities Committee. 2017. Ensuring Strong Equalities Legislation After the EU Exit, Seventh Report of Session 2016–17. HC 799.Google Scholar
  36. HM Government. 2011. Consultation on Modern Workplaces, Flexible Parental Leave. London: BIS.Google Scholar
  37. HM Government. 2012. Consultation on Modern Workplaces. Modern Workplaces—Government Response on Flexible Parental Leave—Impact Assessment. London: BIS.Google Scholar
  38. HM Government. 2017a. The United Kingdom’s Exit from and New Partnership with the European Union. Cm 9417. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  39. HM Government. 2017b. Ensuring Strong Equalities Legislation After the EU Exit: Government’s Response to the Committee’s Seventh Report of Session 2016–17. HC 385.Google Scholar
  40. James, G. 2006. The Work and Families Act 2006: Legislation to Improve Choice and Flexibility? Industrial Law Journal 35 (3): 272–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. James, G. 2009. Mothers and Fathers as Parents and Workers; Family Friendly Employment Policies in an Era of Shifting Identities. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 31 (3): 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. James, G. 2012. Forgotten Children: Work–Family Reconciliation in the EU. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 34 (3): 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewis, J. 2001. The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model: Implications for Work and Care. Social Politics 8 (2): 152–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lock, T. 2017. Human Rights Law in the UK After Brexit. Brexit Special Extra Issue, Public Law (Nov Supp): 117–134.Google Scholar
  45. Lupton, D., and L. Barclay. 1997. Constructing Fatherhood: Discourses and Experiences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. May, T. 2016. Full Speech: Theresa May on ‘Britain After Brexit’. The Spectator, October 2. https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/10/full-speech-theresa-mays-britain-brexit-speech/. Accessed 18 May 2018.
  47. McColgan, A. 2000. Family Friendly Frolics? The Maternity and Parental Leave Etc. Regulations 1999. Industrial Law Journal 29 (2): 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McColgan, A. 2016. Oral Evidence to the Women and Equalities Committee. Impact of Brexit on Gender. HC 657.Google Scholar
  49. McCorkindale, C. 2018. Brexit and Human Rights. Edinburgh Law Review 22 (1): 126–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McCorkindale, C., and A. McHarg. 2018. Continuity and Confusion: Legislating for Brexit in Scotland and Wales (Part II). UK Constitutional Law Blog, March 7. https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2018/03/07/christopher-mccorkindale-and-aileen-mcharg-continuity-and-confusion-legislating-for-brexit-in-scotland-and-wales-part-ii/. Accessed 18 May 2018.
  51. McGlynn, C. 2000. Ideologies of Motherhood in European Community Sex Equality Law. European Law Journal 6 (1): 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller, T. 2011a. Falling Back Into Gender? Men’s Narratives and Practices Around First-Time Fatherhood. Sociology 45 (6): 1094–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller, T. 2011b. Making Sense of Fatherhood: Gender, Caring and Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Millns, S. 2016. What Does Brexit Mean for Women? http://www.sussex.ac.uk/eu/articles/brexit-women. Accessed 18 May 2018.
  55. Mitchell, G. 2015. Encouraging Fathers to Care: The Children and Families Act 2014 and Shared Parental Leave. Industrial Law Journal 44 (1): 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. More, G. 1996. Equal Treatment in European Community Law: The Limits of Market Equality. In Feminist Perspectives on the Foundational Subjects of Law, ed. A. Bottomley. London: Cavendish Publishing.Google Scholar
  57. Morris, A., and T. O’Donnell (eds.). 1999. Feminist Perspectives on Employment Law. London: Cavendish Publishing. Google Scholar
  58. Murphie, J., and M. Weldon-Johns. 2016. The Future of Scottish Labour Law: Reconceptualisation and Modernisation. Juridical Review 3: 227–254.Google Scholar
  59. ONS. 2016. Changes in the Value and Division of Unpaid Care Work in the UK: 2000 to 2015. London: ONS.Google Scholar
  60. Russell, K., and N. MacLean. 2016. Brexit Analysis Bulletin Employment, Immigration & Human Rights. Shepherd and Wedderburn. http://www.shepwedd.co.uk/sites/default/files/Employment_PostRef_Brexit.pdf.
  61. Scottish Government. 2012. National Parenting Strategy. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  62. Scottish Government. 2014a. Working Together Review: Progressive Workplace Policies in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  63. Scottish Government. 2014b. More Powers for the Scottish Parliament. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  64. Scottish Government. 2015. Beyond Smith—Scottish Government Proposals for More Powers for the Scottish Parliament. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  65. Scottish Government. 2016a. Scotland: A European Nation. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  66. Scottish Government. 2016b. Scotland’s Place in Europe. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  67. Scottish Government. 2017a. A Nation with Ambition: The Government’s Programme for Scotland 2017–18. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  68. Scottish Government. 2017b. All Points North: The Scottish Government’s Nordic Baltic Policy Statement. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  69. Scottish Government. 2018a. Scotland’s Place in Europe: People, Jobs and Investment. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  70. Scottish Government. 2018b. Engaging with Men. https://beta.gov.scot/policies/gender-equality/engaging-with-men/. Accessed 18 May 2018.
  71. Scottish Human Rights Commission. 2013. Scotland’s National Action Plan for Human Rights. Edinburgh: Scottish Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  72. Smith Commission. 2014. Report of the Smith Commission for Further Devolution of Powers to the Scottish Parliament. Edinburgh: The Smith Commission.Google Scholar
  73. Statistics Sweden. 2016. Women and Men in Sweden: Facts and Figures 2016. Örebro: Statistics Sweden. Google Scholar
  74. Sturgeon, N. 2016. Full Speech: Nicola Sturgeon on ‘The EU Referendum Result’. https://stv.tv/news/politics/1358534-nicola-sturgeon-speech-in-full-after-eu-referendum-result/. Accessed 18 May 2018.
  75. Taylor, M. 2017. Good Work: The Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices. London: Royal Society of the Arts.Google Scholar
  76. Tipping, S., J. Chanfreau, J. Perry, and C. Tait. 2012. The Fourth Work-Life Balance Employees Survey. Employment Relations Research Series No.122. London: BIS.Google Scholar
  77. Warin, J., Y. Solomon, C. Lewis, and W. Langford. 1999. Fathers, Work and Family Life. London: Family Policy Studies Centre for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  78. Weldon-Johns, M. 2011. The Additional Paternity Leave Regulations 2010: A New Dawn or More ‘Sound-Bite’ Legislation? Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law 33 (1): 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Weldon-Johns, M. 2013. EU Work–Family Policies—Challenging Parental Roles or Reinforcing Gendered Stereotypes? European Law Journal 19 (2): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Weldon-Johns, M. 2016. From Modern Workplaces to Modern Families—Re-envisioning the Work-Family Concept. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 37 (4): 1–21.Google Scholar
  81. Wintemute, R. 1998. When Is pregnancy discrimination indirect sex discrimination? Industrial Law Journal 27 (1): 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Working Families. 2017. The Modern Family Index 2017. London: Working Families.Google Scholar
  83. Yong, A. 2017. Forgetting Human Rights—The Brexit Debate. European Human Rights Law Review 5: 469–479.Google Scholar
  84. Zahn, R. 2018. The Impact of Brexit on Employment Law in Scotland. Edinburgh Law Review 22 (1): 160–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dundee Business SchoolAbertay UniversityDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations