A new surgical technique, such as the bag-in-the-lens (BIL) technique, presents a new learning curve to the surgeon, and the risks and potential benefits of this should be considered. In this chapter we describe the benefits of taking on the learning curve. While the BIL requires additional surgical steps, namely, a primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, it does confer the benefits of PCO prevention, rhexis phimosis prevention, improved centration, improved rotational stability and exchangeability. These advantages make the lens a good option for paediatric and adult cataract cases alike.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Tassignon MI. Morcher GmbH, assignee. Intraocular lens and method for preventing secondary opacification. US patent 6 027 351 2000.Google Scholar
Tassignon M, De Veuster I, Godts D, Kosec D, Van den Dooren K, Gobin L. Bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens implantation in the pediatric eye. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:611–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tassignon M, Gobin L, Mathysen D, Van Looveren J, De Groot V. Clinical outcomes of cataract surgery after bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens implantation following ISO standard 11979-7:2006. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:2120–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leysen I, Coeckelbergh T, Gobin L, Smet H, Daniel Y, DeGroot V, Tassignon MJ. Cumulative neodymium:YAG laser rates after bag-in-the-lens and lens-in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation: comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:2085–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar