James Buchanan and the Return to an Economics of Natural Equals
James Buchanan often argued that fairness is an obligation toward our equals. If Adam Smith is our equal, then we are under obligation to try to understand him. We see this in Buchanan’s attempts to reformat political economy on the basis of natural equals, a world in which Smith’s street porter does indeed have the same capacity as the philosopher. This shows in Buchanan’s excitement over increasing returns models as well as John Rawls’ Theory of Justice both of which he saw a way to make this view operational.
- Hoover Institute Special Collections, Gordon Tullock Papers.Google Scholar
- Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, J. M. (1978). A Contractarian Perspective on Anarchy. Nomos, 19, 29–42.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, J. M. (1979). Review of Lectures on Jurisprudence by Adam Smith, R. L. Meek, D. D. Raphael and P. G. Stein. British Journal of Law and Society, 6, 130–133.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, J. M. (1992). Economic Science in the Future. Eastern Economic Journal, 18, 401–403.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, J. (1994). The Return of Increasing Returns: An Introductory Summary. In J. M. Buchanan & Y. Yoon (Eds.), The Return to Increasing Returns (pp. 3–13). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, J. M. (2003). Obituary: Justice Among Natural Equals: Memorial Marker for John Rawls. Public Choice, 114, iii–v.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, J. M. (2004). 10x10: James M. Buchanan. Politik, 7, 50–52.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, J. M., & Rawls, J. (2008). The Buchanan-Rawls Correspondence. In S. J. Peart & D. M. Levy (Eds.), The Street Porter and the Philosopher: Conservations in Analytical Egalitarianism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, J. M., & Samuels, W. J. (2008). Politics as Exchange or Politics as Power: Two Views of Government. In S. J. Peart & D. M. Levy (Eds.), The Street Porter and the Philosopher: Conversations on Analytical Egalitarianism (pp. 15–40). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent: The Logical Foundations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881). Mathematical Psychics. London: C. Kegan Paul & Co.Google Scholar
- Knight, F. H. (1935). The Ricardian Theory of Production and Distribution. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne d’Economique et de Science politique, 1(3–25), 171–196.Google Scholar
- Lerner, M. (1937). Introduction. Inquiry into the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
- Levy, D. M., & Peart, S. J. (2013). Adam Smith and the State: Language and Reform. In C. Berry, C. Smith, & M. Paganelli (Eds.), Oxford Handbook on Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Levy, D. M., & Peart, S. J. (2019). George Stigler as a Reader of Adam Smith. In C. Freedman (Ed.), Understanding the Enigmatic George Stigler: Extending Price Theory in Economics and Beyond. Springer.Google Scholar
- Malthus, T. R. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population. London: J. Johnson, in St. Paul’s Church-yard. Library of Economics and Liberty [Online]. Available at http://www.econlib.org/library/Malthus/malPop6.html. Accessed May 18, 2018 (Internet).
- Ricardo, D. (1821). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: John Murray. Library of Economics and Liberty [Online]. Available at http://www.econlib.org/library/Ricardo/ricP.html. Accessed May 19, 2018 (Internet).
- Rothbard, M. (2000). Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays. Auburn: Von Mises Institute. Available at https://mises-media.s3.amazonaws.com/Egalitarianism%20as%20a%20Revolt%20Against%20Nature%2C%20and%20Other%20Essays_2.pdf?file=1&type=document.
- Rothbard, M. (2009). Man, Economic and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles. Auburn: Von Mises’ Institute. Available at https://mises.org/sites/default/files/Man,%20Economy,%20and%20State,%20with%20Power%20and%20Market_2.pdf.
- Selby-Bigge, L. A. (1897). The British Moralists, Being Selections from Writers Principally of the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, A. (1904). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. E. Cannan (Ed.). London: Methuen & Co., Ltd. Library of Economics and Liberty [Online]. Available at http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWN3.html. Accessed May 18, 2018 (Internet).
- Stigler, G. J. (1975). The Citizen and the State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Strotz, R. H. (1955–1956). Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization. Review of Economic Studies, 23, 165–180.Google Scholar
- Taussig, F. W. (1915). Some Aspects of the Tariff Question. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Library of Economics and Liberty [Online]. Available at http://www.econlib.org/library/Taussig/tsgSTQ7.html. Accessed May 19, 2018 (Internet).
- Viner, J. (1928). Adam Smith and Laissez-Faire. In J. M. Clark, P. H. Douglas, J. H. Hollander, G. R. Morrow, M. Palyi, & J. Viner (Eds.), Adam Smith, 1776–1926 (pp. 156–179). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Vining, R. (1956). Economics in the United States of America A Review and Interpretation of Research. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Von Mises, L. (1949). Human Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Whately, R. (1832). Introductory Lectures on Political Economy. London: B. Fellowes. Library of Economics and Liberty [Online]. Available at http://www.econlib.org/library/Whately/whtPE.html. Accessed May 20, 2018 (Internet).
- Whately, R. (1833). Easy Lessons on Money Matters; For the Use of Young People. London: J. W. Parker.Google Scholar