Advertisement

Principles of Reconstruction: Palatomaxillary Reconstruction

  • Cesare PiazzaEmail author
  • Alberto Paderno
  • Piero Nicolai
Chapter

Abstract

Minor salivary gland tumours frequently arise from the hard palate and maxillary sinus. Both resection and reconstruction of these structures are particularly challenging in consideration of their essential aesthetic and functional roles. Concerning reconstruction, the main objectives are to reconstitute the palatal and midfacial structural framework, withstanding the forces applied during mastication, to provide adequate separation between the oral cavity and nasal fossa/residual maxillary sinus and to grant a symmetric facial appearance. A number of reconstructive approaches may be applied in this diverse group of defects, ranging from obturator prostheses and local flaps to more complex techniques such as free fascio-cutaneous and/or bone-containing flaps. In this view, it is essential to precisely define the type of defect according to its “horizontal” extension at the level of the hard palate and its “vertical” extent in the midface, orbit and skull base. In this chapter, the most frequently adopted reconstructive choices will be presented and described, detailing their main indications, advantages and downsides.

Keywords

Reconstruction Resection Palatomaxillary Maxillectomy Minor salivary glands Local flap Pedicled flap Free flap 

References

  1. 1.
    Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:352–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown JS, Shaw RJ. Reconstruction of the maxilla and midface: introducing a new classification. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:1001–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cordeiro PG, Santamaria E. A classification system and algorithm for reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:2331–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cordeiro PG, Chen CM. A 15-year review of midface reconstruction after total and subtotal maxillectomy: part I. Algorithm and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:124–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yamamoto Y, Kawashima K, Sugihara T, et al. Surgical management of maxillectomy defects based on the concept of buttress reconstruction. Head Neck. 2004;26:247–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharma AB, Beumer J. Reconstruction of maxillary defects: the case for prosthetic rehabilitation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1770–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keyf F. Obturator prostheses for hemimaxillectomy patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:821–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gullane PJ, Arena S. Palatal island flap for reconstruction of oral defects. Arch Otolaryngol. 1977;103:598–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ducic Y, Herford AS. The use of palatal island flaps as an adjunct to microvascular free tissue transfer for reconstruction of complex oromandibular defects. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:1666–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hao SP. Reconstruction of oral defects with the pedicled buccal fat pad flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;122:863–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meyer E, Liebenberg SJ, Fagan JJ. Buccal fat pad – a simple, underutilised flap. S Afr J Surg. 2012;50:47–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim MK, Han W, Kim SG. The use of the buccal fat pad flap for oral reconstruction. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;39:5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pribaz J, Stephens W, Crespo L, Gifford G. A new intraoral flap: facial artery musculomucosal (FAMM) flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:421–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dupoirieux L, Plane L, Gard C, Penneau M. Anatomical basis and results of the facial artery musculomucosal flap for oral reconstruction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;37:25–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ashtiani AK, Emami SA, Rasti M. Closure of complicated palatal fistula with facial artery musculomucosal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:381–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Duflo S, Lief F, Paris J, et al. Microvascular radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flap in hard palate reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:784–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ciuman R, Mohr C, Kroger K, Dost P. The forearm flap: assessment of functional and aesthetic outcomes and quality of life. Am J Otolaryngol. 2007;28:367–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Toschka H, Feifel H, Erli HJ, et al. Aesthetic and functional results of harvesting radial forearm flap, especially with regard to hand function. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30:42–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clark JR, Vesely M, Gilbert R. Scapular angle osteomyogenous flap in postmaxillectomy reconstruction: defect, reconstruction, shoulder function, and harvest technique. Head Neck. 2008;30:10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miles BA, Gilbert RW. Maxillary reconstruction with the scapular angle osteomyogenous free flap. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137:1130–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Piazza C, Paderno A, Del Bon F, et al. Palato-maxillary reconstruction by the angular branch-based tip of scapula free flap. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274:939–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Janus JR, Carlson ML, Moore EJ. The scapular, parascapular, and latissimus dorsi flap as a single osteomyocutaneous flap for repair of complex oral defects. Clin Anat. 2012;25:120–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brown JS. Deep circumflex iliac artery free flap with internal oblique muscle as a new method of immediate reconstruction of maxillectomy defect. Head Neck. 1996;18:412–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rogers SN, Lakshmiah SR, Narayan B, et al. A comparison of the long-term morbidity following deep circumflex iliac and fibula free flaps for reconstruction following head and neck cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1517–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Valentini V, Gennaro P, Aboh IV, et al. Iliac crest flap: donor site morbidity. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20:1052–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Baj A, Youssef DA, Monteverdi R, et al. Reconstruction of partial maxillary defects with the double-barrel fibula free flap. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2010;30:299–302.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peng X, Mao C, Yu GY, et al. Maxillary reconstruction with the free fibula flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1562–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang WB, Wang Y, Liu XJ, et al. Reconstruction of maxillary defects with free fibula flap assisted by computer techniques. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:630–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ling XF, Peng X. What is the price to pay for a free fibula flap? A systematic review of donor-site morbidity following free fibula flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:657–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Browne JD, Burke AJ. Benefits of routine maxillectomy and orbital reconstruction with the rectus abdominis free flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;121:203–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bianchi B, Bertolini F, Ferrari S, Sesenna E. Maxillary reconstruction using rectus abdominis free flap and bone grafts. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;44:526–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pagedar NA, Gilbert RW, Chan H, et al. Maxillary reconstruction using the scapular tip free flap: a radiologic comparison of 3D morphology. Head Neck. 2012;34:1377–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Maxillofacial and Thyroid SurgeryFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei TumoriMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgerySpedali Civili of Brescia, University of BresciaBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations