Inducing Optimal Quality Under Price Caps: Why, How, and Whether

  • Timothy J. BrennanEmail author
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy book series (TREP)


Quality of postal service is of concern around the world, and was a subject of proceedings in the US to assess the performance of price-cap regulation (PCR) of “market-dominant” services. Although PCR does not imply minimizing quality, work by Sappington implies that quality will be below the optimal level at the regulated price. Mechanisms to get regulated firms to internalize this quality externality, consistent with information limitations justifying PCR, provide no benefits to postal customers. Negotiated arrangements between a postal operator and its regulator to set and incentivize quality of service are likely the best available option.


  1. Brennan, T. (1989). Regulating by ‘capping’ prices. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1(2), 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brennan, T., & Crew, M. (2014). Gross substitutes vs. marginal substitutes: Implications for market definition in the postal sector. In M. Crew & T. Brennan (Eds.), The role of the postal and delivery sector in a digital age (pp. 1–15). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  3. Brennan, T., & Crew, M. (2016). Price cap regulation and declining demand. In M. Crew & T. Brennan (Eds.), The future of the postal sector in a digital world (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Littlechild, S. (1983). Regulation of British telecommunications’ profitability. London, UK: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  5. Loeb, M., & Magat, W. (1979). A decentralized method for utility regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mankiw, N. G., & Whinston, M. (1986). Free entry and social inefficiency. RAND Journal of Economics, 17(1), 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Okholm, H., Basalisco, B., Boivie, A. M., & Gårdebrink, J. (2018). Challenges of regulating quality of service in the postal industry. In P. L. Parcu, T. Brennan, & V. Glass (Eds.), New business and regulatory strategies in the postal sector. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Ovaere, M. (2017). Cost-efficiency and quality regulation of a public utility (Discussion paper series DPS17.21). Leuven, Belgium: KU Leuven, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  9. Pearsall, E. S. (2018). Adjusting rates for quality of service: Have market-dominant mail rates risen faster than the CPI-U? In P. L. Parcu, T. Brennan, & V. Glass (Eds.), The contribution of the postal and delivery sector: Between e-commerce and e-substitution (pp. 271–285). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sappington, D. (2005). Regulating service quality: A survey. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 27(2), 123–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sappington, D., & Sibley, D. (1988). Regulating without cost information: The incremental surplus subsidy scheme. International Economic Review, 29(2), 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Spence, A. M. (1975). Monopoly, quality, and regulation. Bell Journal of Economics, 6(2), 417–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Weisman, D. L. (2005). Price regulation and quality. Information Economics and Policy, 17(2), 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public PolicyUMBCBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations