Advertisement

Unifying and Dividing Traits in Civil-Protection and Crisis-Management Institutions in the EU

  • Sten WidmalmEmail author
  • Charles F. Parker
  • Thomas Persson
Chapter
Part of the European Administrative Governance book series (EAGOV)

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors make use of mainly descriptive information about the main factors discussed in the interviews and that were measured in the survey with civil-protection practitioners. The way social capital and administrative culture affects civil-protection organizations in the countries included in the study, and to some extent in the DG ECHO and the Emergency Response Coordination Centre (ERCC), is investigated. In the analysis, the authors focus extensively on key indicators of social capital and administrative culture that have been studied in this project. Although the findings mainly relate to the countries included in this study, the authors also want to describe what the European ‘map’ looks like in terms of how social capital and administrative culture facilitate cooperation or undermine it.

Bibliography

  1. Greve, C., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2016). Nordic Administrative Reforms: Lessons for Public Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S., Andrews, R., & Bezes, P. (Eds.). (2016). Public Administration Reforms in Europe: The View from the Top. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Huntington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  4. Kaplan, R. D. (2012). The Revenge of Geography: What the Map Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  5. Lebow, R. N. (1981). Between Peace and War. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Mattsson, B.-M. (2015). Neutralitetens tid: Svensk utrikespolitik från världssamvete till medgörlig lagspelare. Stockholm: Forum.Google Scholar
  7. Peters, G. (2000). Governance and Public Sector Management: Four Main Administrative Traditions. Retrieved May 31, 2017, from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTPUBLICSECTORANDGOVERNANCE/0,contentMDK:20134002~pagePK:210058~piPK:210062~theSitePK:286305,00.html#1.
  8. Widmalm, S. (2016). Åtstramningspolitiken hotar den grekiska demokratin. Respons, No. 3.Google Scholar
  9. Widmalm, S., & Oskarsson, S. (Eds.). (2010). Prometokrati: Mellan Diktatur och Demokrati. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sten Widmalm
    • 1
    Email author
  • Charles F. Parker
    • 2
  • Thomas Persson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GovernmentUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Government Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science (CNDS)Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations