Advertisement

Women in Higher Education: A Vase-Breaking Theory by Female Technologists in Taiwan

  • Ya-Hsuan WangEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International and Development Education book series (INTDE)

Abstract

Gender equality is a key issue in Taiwan thanks to the policy of gender mainstreaming. This study aims to explore the gender-technology relation in Taiwan’s higher education by drawing upon female discourses on technology, gender, and success. Data were collected by individual interviews from 28 women in technology who were asked about their experiences of doing technology, doing gender and performing femininity or/and masculinity. Based on the cross-generation females’ accounts on their context of family, schools, and society, this chapter explores how female technologists constitute their gender roles and how they articulate the formation of gendered technology phenomenon. It concludes with a vase-breaking theory that elite female technologists can break gender boundaries through multiple means that include developing personal multiple interests and enacting characteristics of normative masculinity, getting support from family and school empowerment inspired by female role models and masculine climates in single-sex schools and social support from university.

Keywords

Female technologists Gendered technology Higher education Taiwan Vase-breaking theory 

References

  1. Bem, S.L. 1974. “The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42: 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berila, B. 2011. “Queer Masculinities in Higher Education.” In Masculinities in Higher Education: Theoretical and Practical Considerations, edited by J.A. Laker and T. Davis, 97–110. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Brickhouse, N. 1994. “Bringing in the Outsiders: Reshaping the Sciences of the Future.” Curriculum Studies 26: 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Connell, R. 2006. “Glass Ceilings or Gendered Institutions? Mapping the Gender Regimes of Public Sector Worksites.” Public Administration Review November/December: 837–849.Google Scholar
  5. Department of Statistics. 2009. “College Students’ Numbers and Percentage by Gender and Three Disciplines over the Years, 2009.” Department of Statistics. http://140.111.34.54/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=8168. Accessed January 19, 2010.
  6. Guy, M.E. 1994. “Organizational Architecture, Gender, and Women’s Careers.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 14 (2): 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lather, P. 1991. Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Phipps, A. 2008. “Women in Science, Engineering, and Technology: Three Decades of UK Initiatives.” Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham Books. Google Scholar
  9. Vaerting, M. 1923. The Dominant Sex: A Study in the Sociology of Sex Differentiation. Translated from German by Eden and Cedar Paul. Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library. http://etext.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/VaeDomi.html. Accessed December 15, 2008.
  10. Wajcman, J. 1991. Feminism Confronts Technology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Wang, Y.H. 2010. “Still Gender Boundary? Exploring Woman University Technology Students’ Doing Gender and Doing Technology.” International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, eManagement, and e-Learning 2 (1): 34–39.Google Scholar
  12. _____. 2014. “The Discourse of Success by Women Scientists and Technologists.” Journal of Research in Education Sciences 59 (4): 137–164.Google Scholar
  13. _____. 2016. “The Discourse of Trap by Women Scientists and Technologists.” Chinese Journal of Science Education 24 (2): 167–193.Google Scholar
  14. Wu, S.-M. (2009). “The Career Development of Eminent Female Scientists in Taiwan.” Bulletin of Special Education 34 (1): 75–103.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationNational Chung Cheng UniversityChia-YiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations