Advertisement

Standards for Higher Secondary Education for Computer Science in Germany

  • Arno Pasternak
  • Lutz Hellmig
  • Gerhard Röhner
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11169)

Abstract

In this paper we will report on the Standards for Higher Secondary Education for Computer Science in Germany. After the first results of the PISA-studies in Germany the administration in the central and the federal states switched standards and curricula from setting teaching aims and cognitive learning objectives to describing students’ learning outcome with practices.

On the central level this work was only done for the major subjects like Mathematics, Mother Tongue, Foreign Language and Natural Science. This is a disadvantage for the other subjects in school.

Therefore the German CS society—Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)—installed a working group to develop standards for higher secondary education in 2013. By the end of 2015 this group finished the task and in January 2016 the board of the GI published this academic work as the official standards in Germany for higher secondary CS education [2].

It is to be hoped that these standards will have a positive impact on the standardisation of computer science teaching in the various German federal states, just as the standards for lower secondary education had almost 10 years earlier.

Keywords

Higher secondary computer science education Education standards CS in Germany 

Notes

Acknowledgments

In Germany standards were usually developed in working groups installed by administration organizations without a considerable discussion with teachers or other people. These standards for CS were developed without involving any administration structure. The goal was to involve many teachers in this process. Experts were invited by the working group to discuss part of these standards. In September 2015 these standards were reviewed on the German conference INFOS (Informatik und Schule). Additionally an online survey was conducted in November 2015. Thanks to all the people involved in this process.

References

  1. 1.
    Arbeitskreis ‘Bildungsstandards’ der GI: Grundsätze und Standards für die Informatik in der Schule. LOGIN-Verlag, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arbeitskreis ‘Bildungsstandards SII’ der GI: Bildungsstandards Informatik für die Sekundarstufe II. LOGIN-Verlag, Berlin (2016). http://informatikstandards.de/docs/Bildungsstandards_SII.pdf. Accessed 09 June 2016
  3. 3.
    Dahrendorf, R.: Bildung ist Bürgerrecht. Plädoyer für eine aktive Bildungspolitik. Nannen-Verlag, Hamburg (1965)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hubwieser, P.: Computer science education in secondary schools – the introduction of a new compulsory subject. Trans. Comput. Educ. 12(4), 16:1–16:41 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    KMK (Ständige Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland): Vereinbarung zur Gestaltung der gymnasialen Oberstufe in der Sekundarstufe II (1972)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    KMK (Ständige Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland): Einheitliche Prüfungsanforderungen in der Abiturprüfung Informatik. Luchterhand, Neuwied (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    KMK (Ständige Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland): Bildungsstandandards im Fach Physik für den mittleren Bildungsabschluss - Beschluss vom 16.12.2004. Wolters Kluwer Deutschland - Luchterhand, Neuwied (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knobelsdorf, M., et al.: Computer science education in North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany. A Case Study. Trans. Comput. Educ. 15(2), 9:1–9:22 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Merkel, G.: Über Informatikkenntnisse des gebildeten Bürgers. In: Stetter, F., Brauer, W. (eds.) Informatik und Schule 1989: Zukunftsperspektiven der Informatik für Schule und Ausbildung, pp. 56–68. Springer, Heidelberg (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75163-9_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    NTCM: Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    OECD: Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills A New Framework for Assessment: A New Framework for Assessment. Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills A New Framework for Assessment, OECD Publishing (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    OECD, Adams, R., Wu, M., Program for International Student Assessment, Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development: Pisa 2000 Technical report. OECD (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    OECD, Statistics, U.: PISA Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow Further Results from PISA 2000: Further Results from PISA 2000. OECD Publishing (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Picht, G.: Die Deutsche Bildungskatastrophe. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, München, 2 edn. (1965), 1. Auflage 1964, Walter-Verlag OltenGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Puhlmann, H., Schulte, C., Brinda, T.: Bridging ICT and CS: educational standards for computer science in lower secondary education. Source ACM SIGCSE Bull. Arch. 41(3), 288–292 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tyler, R.W.: Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fritz-Steinhoff-Schule HagenTechnische Universität DortmundDortmundGermany
  2. 2.Universität RostockRostockGermany
  3. 3.Lichtenberg-Schule Darmstadt, Studienseminar DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations