Advertisement

Patient with Isolated Diurnal Hypertension

  • Julian Segura
Chapter
Part of the Practical Case Studies in Hypertension Management book series (PCSHM)

Abstract

A 70-year-old, Caucasian male, diagnosed of hypertension at 55 years of age, was referred by his family physician to perform a 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and to evaluate uncontrolled hypertension. He was treated with four antihypertensive drugs. 24-h ABPM was performed, and the final diagnosis was uncontrolled diurnal hypertension.

There are several advantages of ABPM when compared with clinic BP that reinforce a more widely use of this type of BP measurement in the clinical practice. Current blood pressure (BP) thresholds for hypertension diagnosis based on ABPM is an average BP ≥135/85 mmHg during daytime period.

Keywords

Daytime hypertension Diurnal uncontrolled hypertension 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring Cardiovascular risk High blood pressure 

References

  1. 1.
    O’Brien E, Parati G, Stergiou G Asmar R, Beilin L, Bilo G, et al., on behalf of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. European Society of Hypertension Position Paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1731–68.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banegas JR, Segura J, Sobrino J, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, de la Sierra, de la Cruz JJ, et al., for the Spanish Society of Hypertension Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry Investigators. Effectiveness of blood pressure control outside the medical setting. Hypertension. 2007;49:62–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Head GA, Mihailidou AS, Duggan KA, Beilin LJ, Berry N, Brown MA, et al., for the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Working Group of the High Blood Pressure Research Council of Australia. Definition of ambulatory blood pressure targets for diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in relation to clinic blood pressure: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2010;340:c1104.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mancia G, Facchetti R, Bombelli M, Grassi G, Sega R. Long-term risk of mortality associated with selective and combined elevation in office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertension. 2006;47:846–53.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Owens P, Lyons S, O’Brien E. Ambulatory blood pressure in the hypertensive population: patterns and prevalence of hypertensive sub-forms. J Hypertens. 1998;16:1735–43.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parati G. Blood pressure variability: its measurement and significance in hypertension. J Hypertens. 2005;23(Suppl 1):S19–25.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stergiou GS, Parati G, Vlachopoulos C, Achimastos A, Andreadis E, Asmar R, et al. Methodology and technology for peripheral and central blood pressure and blood pressure variability measurement: current status and future directions—position statement of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on blood pressure monitoring and cardiovascular variability. J Hypertens. 2016;34:1665–77.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kikuya M, Hansen TW, Thijs L, Bjorklund-Bodegard K, Kuznetsova T, Ohkubo T, et al., International Database on Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes Investigators. Diagnostic thresholds for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring based on 10-year cardiovascular risk. Circulation. 2007;24:2145–52.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williams B, Mancia G, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2018;39(33):3021–104.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julian Segura
    • 1
  1. 1.Hypertension Unit, Department of NephrologyHospital Universitario 12 de OctubreMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations