Advertisement

Routes and Routers of Interculturalism: Islands, Theatres and Shakespeares

  • Alvin Eng Hui Lim
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Performance InterActions book series (CPI)

Abstract

This chapter explores intercultural Asian Shakespeare productions by island-based theatre companies, individuals, and cultures in Southeast and East Asia, tracing both their performance travels and how this work is archived. These interactions make visible established networks where practitioners, producers, and audiences gather in international festivals to produce intercultural adaptations of Shakespeare’s plays. The chapter will argue that recent intercultural productions reiterate established colonial routes of exchange, but that new possibilities may be emerging from the multiplication of pathways for performance to travel through digital means. Digital archives such as Asian Shakespeare Intercultural Archive (A|S|I|A), Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s (MIT) Global Shakespeares, and the Shakespeare Lives programme in Asia reflect an increasingly entangled cultural environment that mobilises Shakespeare and local performance forms to travel (both physically and digitally) through geographical circuits. On the one hand, the directions (and creative choices) that these productions take echo the old colonial imperatives and responses that go back to the late nineteenth to early twentieth centuries, when Western troupes, particularly the George Crichton Miln Company, travelled to Southeast and East Asia. On the other hand, new nodes of exchange facilitated through digital technology better reflect specific cultural engagements and entanglements rooted in shifting geopolitics and hegemonies.

Works Cited

  1. Bay-Cheng, Sarah. 2012. Theater Is Media: Some Principles for a Digital Historiography of Performance. Theater 42 (2): 27–41.  https://doi.org/10.1215/01610775-1507775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, Tobias. 2014. Entertaining the Empire: Theatrical Touring Companies and Amateur Dramatics in Colonial India. The Historical Journal 57 (3): 699–725.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X13000538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bharucha, Rustom. 1993. Theatre and the World: Performance and the Politics of Culture. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bird, Tom. 2013. The Globe to Globe Festival: An Introduction. In Shakespeare Beyond English: A Global Experiment, ed. S. Bennett and C. Carson, 13–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139629119.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brokering, Jon M. 2007. Ninagawa Yukio’s Intercultural “Hamlet”: Parsing Japanese Iconography. Asian Theatre Journal 24 (2): 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabranes-Grant, Leo. 2011. From Scenarios to Networks: Performing the Intercultural in Colonial Mexico. Theatre Journal 63: 499–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlson, Marvin. 2001. The Haunted Stage: The Theatre as Memory Machine. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaudhuri, Una. 1991. The Future of the Hyphen: Interculturalism, Textuality, and the Difference Within. In Interculturalism and Performance: Writings from PAJ, ed. Bonnie Marranca and Gautam Dasgupta, 192–207. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Christian, John Leroy. 2001. Commerce, Industry and Labor. In South East Asia, Colonial History: High Imperialism (1890s–1930s), ed. Paul H. Kratoska, 162–177. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Clifford, James. 1997. Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Connerton, Paul. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farfan, Penny, and Ric Knowles. 2011. Editorial Comment: Special Issue on Rethinking Intercultural Performance. Theatre Journal 63 (4): i–iii.  https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2011.0108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Featherstone, Mike. 2000. Archiving Cultures. British Journal of Sociology 51 (1): 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang, A.C.Y. 2011. Asian Shakespeare 2.0. Asian Theatre Journal 28 (1): 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1353/atj.2011.0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ick, Judy Celine. 2017. The Augmentation of the Indies: An Archipelagic Approach to Asian and Global Shakespeare. In Shakespeare’s Asian Journeys: Critical Encounters, Cultural Geographies, and the Politics of Travel, ed. Bi-qi Beatrice Lei, Judy Celine Ick, and Poonam Trivedi, 19–36. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Im, Yeeyon. 2004. The Pitfalls of Intercultural Discourse: The Case of Yukio Ninagawa. Shakespeare Bulletin 22 (4): 7–30.Google Scholar
  17. Kawachi, Yoshiko. 2017. Shakespeare’s Long Journey to Japan: His Contribution to Her Modernization and Cultural Exchange. In Shakespeare’s Asian Journeys: Critical Encounters, Cultural Geographies, and the Politics of Travel, ed. Bi-qi Beatrice Lei, Judy Celine Ick, and Poonam Trivedi, 37–54. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Kennedy, Dennis. 1993. “Afterword: Shakespearean Orientalism,” in Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance. In Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance, ed. Dennis Kennedy, 290–303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2001. Looking at Shakespeare: A Visual History of Twentieth-Century Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kobayashi, Kaori. 2000. Touring in Asia: The Miln Company’s Shakespearean Productions in Japan. In Shakespeare and his Contemporaries in Performance, ed. Edward J. Esche, 53–72. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2013. Between the East and the West: Tsubouchi Shoyo’s Production of Hamlet in 1911. In Renaissance Shakespeare: Shakespeare Renaissances: Proceedings of the Ninth World Shakespeare Congress, ed. Martin Procházka, Andreas Höfele, Hanna Scolnicov, and Michael Dobson, 220–228. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2016. ‘The Actors Are Come Hither’: Shakespeare Productions by Travelling Companies in Asia. New Theatre Quarterly 32 (1): 49–60.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X15000858. Accessed 23 June 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lei, Daphne P. 2011. Interruption, Intervention, Interculturalism: Robert Wilson’s HIT Productions in Taiwan. Theatre Journal 63: 571–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lei, Bi-qi Beatrice. 2017. Shakespeare’s Asian Journeys: An Introduction. In Shakespeare’s Asian Journeys: Critical Encounters, Cultural Geographies, and the Politics of Travel, ed. Bi-qi Beatrice Lei, Judy Celine Ick, and Poonam Trivedi, 1–15. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Miln, Louise Jordan. 1894. When We Were Strolling Players in the East. London: Osgood, McIlvaine and Co.Google Scholar
  26. Min, Tian. 2008. The Poetics of Difference and Displacement: Twentieth-Century Chinese-Western Intercultural Theatre. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Norzizi Zulkifli (dir.). 2018. Mak Yong Titis Sakti, Programme, 27 January–4 February 2018. The Actors Studio, The Kuala Lumpur Performing Arts Centre.Google Scholar
  28. Pratt, Mary Louise. 1991. Arts of the Contact Zone. Profession: 33–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25595469
  29. Roach, Joseph. 1996. Cities of the Dead: Circum-Atlantic Performance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. router, n.6. OED Online. June 2017. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/272580?rskey=xDDado&result=6&isAdvanced=false. Accessed 01 July 2017.
  31. Shakespeare’s Globe archive to be digitized. SAGE Publishing. 4 August 2016. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/press/shakespeare%E2%80%99s-globe-archive-to-be-digitized. Accessed 1 Nov 2017.
  32. Shevtsova, Maria. 2016. The Craiova Shakespeare Festival 2016 and a Valediction for Yukio Ninagawa. New Theatre Quarterly 32 (3): 276–282.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X16000257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simmel, Georg. 1997. Simmel on Culture. Ed. D. Frisby and M. Featherstone. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Suematsu, Michiko. 2010. Import/Export: Japanizing Shakespeare. In Shakespeare in Asia: Contemporary Performance, ed. Dennis Kennedy and Yong Li Lan, 155–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Tsubouchi, Shoyo. 1927. Naichi de Hajimete Mita Gaikoku-haiyu no Shakespeare-geki no Insho [The Impression of Foreign Actors: Shakespearean Productions I Saw for the First Time in Japan]. In Shoyo Senshu XII, Trans. Kaori Kobayashi, 375–377. Tokyo: Shunyodo.Google Scholar
  36. Varney, Denise, Peter Eckersall, Chris Hudson, and Barbara Hatley. 2013. Theatre and Performance in the Asia-Pacific: Regional Modernities in the Global Era. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yong, Li Lan. 2010. Shakespeare Here and Elsewhere: Ong Keng Sen’s Intercultural Shakespeare. In Shakespeare in Asia: Contemporary Performance, ed. Dennis Kennedy and Yong Li Lan, 188–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Yong, Li Lan, Ha Young Hwang, Alvin Eng Hui Lim, Ken Takiguchi, Chee Keng Lee, Michiko Suematsu, Kaori Kobayashi, and Hyon-u Lee. 2014. Asian Shakespeare Intercultural Archive (A|S|I|A). 3rd ed. Singapore: National University of Singapore. In English, Chinese, Japanese and Korean. www.a-s-i-a-web.org

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Department of English Language and LiteratureNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations