Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Maria-Carmen Pantea
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents the main research findings that relate to the three ideological layers present in young people’s accounts: (i) the level of ‘ideal values’ that positions young people’s powerful and conservative values; (ii) the level of ‘real values’ shaped by actual interactions in the world and which suggest young people’s engagement with the neoliberal mode of self-governance and (iii) the level of necessity or the actual expectations that are grounded in the deep realization that the actual prospects likely to unfold are more constraining than enabling. It discusses the policy implications that relate to the quality of schooling, the (mis)use of VET as a social inclusion tool and the need to revisit the employability discourse.

Keywords

Policy Employability Dual model Functional illiteracy Social inclusion Poverty Civism Liberal education Parity of esteem 

References

  1. Billett, S. (2006). Constituting the Workplace Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billett, S. (2011). Vocational Education. Purposes, Traditions and Prospects. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cort, P., Mariager-Anderson, K., & Thomsen, R. (2018). Busting the Myth of Low-Skilled Workers – Destabilizing EU LLL Policies Through the Life Stories of Danes in Low-Skilled Jobs. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 37(2): 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuervo, H., & Wyn, J. (2012). Young People Making It Work: Continuity and Change in Rural Places. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  5. De Stuart, S. N. (1999). Super-Optimum Solutions and Win-win Policy: Basic Concepts and Principles. Westport: Greenwood-Quorum.Google Scholar
  6. DeFalco, A. (2016). Dewey and Vocational Education: Still Timely? The Journal of School & Society, 3(1), 54–64.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1913). An Undemocratic Proposal. American Teacher, 2, 2–4.Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, J. (1915/1979). Education vs. Trade-Training: Reply to David Snedden. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1899–1924 (pp. 36–48). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. (1916/1966). Democracy and Education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1937). The Challenge of Democracy to Education. Progressive Education, 14(February), 79–85.Google Scholar
  11. Eichhorst, W., Rodríguez-Planas, N., Schmidl, R., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2015). A Road Map to Vocational Education and Training in Industrialized Countries. ILR Review, 68(2), 314–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epstein, C. (1990). The Cultural Perspective and the Study of Work. In K. Erikson & S. P. Vailas (Eds.), The Nature of Work: Sociological Perspectives. New Haven: Yale.Google Scholar
  13. European Commission. (2016). Education and Training Monitor 2016. Romania. https://ec.europa.eu/education/sites/education/files/monitor2016-ro_en.pdf
  14. Farrugia, D. (2018). Spaces of Youth. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farrugia, D., & Wood, B. E. (2017). Youth and Spatiality Towards Interdisciplinarity. Youth Studies, 25(3), 209–218.Google Scholar
  16. Farrugia, D., Threadgold, S., & Coffey, J. (2018). Young Subjectivities and Affective Labour in the Service Economy. Journal of Youth Studies, 21(3), 272–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. France, A., & Roberts, S. (2017). Youth and Social Class: Enduring Inequality in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerrard, J. (2015). Public Education in Neoliberal Times: Memory and Desire. Journal of Education Policy, 30(6), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hagedorn, L. S. (1999). Vocational Education and the Collegiate Ideal: The Threat and the Challenge of Limited Resources. New Directions for Higher Education, 105, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanushek, E. A., Woessmann, L., & Zhang, L. (2011). General Education, Vocational Education and Labor Market Outcomes over the Life-Cycle (IZA Discussion Paper 6083). Bonn.Google Scholar
  21. Institutul National de Statistica. (2017). Comunicat de presa Nr. 312 /11 decembrie 2017. Retrieved from http://www.insse.ro/cms/sites/default/files/com_presa/com_pdf/cs10r17.pdf
  22. Jackson, N. (1993). If Competence Is the Answer What Is the Question? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Vocational Education Research, 1(1), 46–60.Google Scholar
  23. Laker, J., Naval, C., & Mrnjaus, K. (2014). The Folly of Employability: The Case for a Citizen-Driven Market Economy. Annales. Series Historia et Sociologia, 24(3), 397–406.Google Scholar
  24. Letwin, O. (1988). Aims of Schooling: The Importance of Grounding. London: Center for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  25. Longhofer, J., Floersch, J., & Hoy, J. (2012). Qualitative Methods for Practice Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malamud, O., & Pop-Eleches, C. (2008). General Education vs. Vocational Training: Evidence from an Economy in Transition (NBER Working Paper No. w14155). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1161038
  27. Martinez Aleman, A. (2001). The Ethics of Democracy: Individuality and Educational Policy Educational Policy. Educational Policy, 15(3), 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mulder, M., & Roelofs, E. (2011). A Critical Review of Vocational Education and Training Research and Suggestions for the Research Agenda. Wageningen: Wageningen University.Google Scholar
  29. OECD. (2014, February). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Vol. 1, Rev. ed.). Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Powell, L. (2012). Reimagining the Purpose of VET – Expanding the Capability to Aspire in South African Further Education and Training Students. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(5), 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Powell, L. (2014). Reimagining the Purpose of Vocational Education and Training: The Perspectives of Further Education and Training College Students in South Africa. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  32. Powell, L. (2015). Towards a Transformed but also Transformative Vocational Education and Training. CIER Seminar – Towards a transformed but also transformative Vocational Education and Training. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mVwD7Ixrws
  33. Powell, L., & McGrath, S. (2014). Exploring the Value of the Capability Approach for Vocational Education and Training Evaluation: Reflections from South Africa. In Education, Learning, Training: Critical Issues for Development (pp. 126–148). Boston: Brill-Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prosser, T. (2016). Dualization or Liberalization? Investigating Precarious Work in Eight European Countries. Work, Employment and Society, 30(6), 949–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rehm, M. L. (1994). Critical Pedagogy and Vocational Education: A Search for New Metaphors. In R. D. Lakes (Ed.), Empowering Students for Work: An Introduction to Critical Perspectives in Vocational Education (pp. 143–160). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  36. Roberts, S. (2011). Beyond ‘NEET’ and ‘Tidy’ Pathways: Considering the ‘Missing Middle’ of Youth Transition Studies. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roberts, K. (2016). Unemployment. In S. Edgell, H. Gottfried, & E. Granter (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of the Sociology of Work and Employment (pp. 469–484). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  38. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  39. Sennett, R. (1998). The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  40. Smyth, J. (2012). Doing Research on Student Voice in Australia. Management in Education, 26(3), 153–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stahl, G. (2014). The Affront of the Aspiration Agenda: White Working-Class Male Narratives of ‘Ordinariness’ in Neoliberal Times. Masculinities and Social Change, 3(2), 88–118.Google Scholar
  42. Thompson, J. F. (1973). Foundations of Vocational Education: Social and Philosophical Concepts. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  43. UNESCO. (2017). 6 Out of 10 Children and Adolescents Are Not Learning a Minimum in Reading and Math. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/en/news/6-out-10-children-and-adolescents-are-not-learning-minimum-reading-and-math
  44. Walker, M. (2006). Towards a Capability-Based Theory of Social Justice for Education Policy-Making. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wallenborn, M., & Heyneman, S. P. (2009). Should Vocational Education Be Part of Secondary Education. Journal of Educational Change, 10, 405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. White, J. (1997). Education and the End of Work. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. Retrieved from https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/education-and-the-end-of-work-9781847142306/
  47. Winch, C. (1995). Vocational Education? A Liberal Interpretation. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 14(4), 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Winch, C. (2000). Education, Work and Social Capital: Towards a New Conception of Vocational Education. Florence: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Winch, C. (2003). Occupational Identity and Vocational Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(1), 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Winch, C. (2013). The Attractiveness of TVET. In UNESCO-UNEVOC (Ed.), Revisiting Global Trends in TVET: Reflections on Theory and Practice (pp. 86–122). Bonn: UNESCO-UNEVOC.Google Scholar
  51. Wolf, A. (2002). Does Education Matter. London: Penguin Books Limited.Google Scholar
  52. Wolf, A. (2011). Review of Vocational Education – The Wolf Report. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/180504/DFE-00031-2011.pdf
  53. World Bank. (2018). World Development Report 2018: Learning to Realize Education’s Promise. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zipin, L., Sellar, S., Brennan, M., & Gale, T. (2015). Educating for Futures in Marginalized Regions: A Sociological Framework for Rethinking and Researching Aspirations. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(3), 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria-Carmen Pantea
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Sociology and Social WorkBabeș-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations