Immersive and Collaborative Classroom Experiences in Virtual Reality

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 880)


In these early days of educational Virtual Reality (VR) applications, it is critical to establish best practices for exploring the subtle relationship between experiences in VR and learning. In contrast to typical user studies, the evaluation of a VR experience offered by a prototype can be subject to the intermittent breaking of an illusion; something users tend not to recover from. Our work proposes a set of metrics related to presence, immersion and flow, and considers them in the context of two case studies. First, the results of a 60 user exploratory study reveal the need to not only modify the proposed metrics, but to innovate in terms of collaborative experiences. Second, key ways to introduce cost-effective collaboration mechanisms into educational VR experiences are introduced. Both of these studies are the result of ongoing work with the Royal BC Museum.


Virtual Reality Education Disaster preparedness Interactive education Collaborative education 



We thank all the participants who were available for this study, and the students involved in creating the prototypes.


  1. 1.
    Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., Terry, L.: What knowledge is of most worth. J. Digit. Learn. Teacher Educ. 29(4), 127–140 (2013). Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saavedra, A.R., Opfer, V.D.: Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan 94(2), 8–13 (2012). Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hanson, K., Shelton, B.: Design and development of virtual reality: analysis of challenges faced by educators. ITLS Faculty Publications, vol. 11, p. 01 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang, H.: Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 33(1), 27–37 (2002). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, H.-M., Rauch, U., Liaw, S.-S.: Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: based on a constructivist approach. Comput. Educ. 55(3), 1171–1182 (2010). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bricken, M., Byrne, C.: Summer students in virtual reality: a pilot study on educational applications of virtual reality technology. University of Washington (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, C.-T.: Development and evaluation of senior high school courses on emerging technology: a case study of a course on virtual reality. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 11(1), 46–59 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hauptman, H.: Enhancement of spatial thinking with virtual spaces 1.0. Comput. Educ. 54(1), 123–135 (2010). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tcha-Tokey, K., Christmann, O., Loup-Escande, E., Richir, S.: Proposition and validation of a questionnaire to measure the user experience in immersive virtual environments. Int. J. Virtual Reality 16(1), 33–48 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bressler, D., Bodzin, A.: A mixed methods assessment of students’ flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 29(6), 505–517 (2013). Scholar
  11. 11.
    Witmer, B.G., Jerome, C.J., Singer, M.J.: The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 14(3), 298–312 (2005). Scholar
  12. 12.
    Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 7(3), 225–240 (1998). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations