Advertisement

A Complete Evaluation of the TAM3 Model for Cloud Computing Technology Acceptance

  • Fotios Nikolopoulos
  • Spiridon Likothanassis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11230)

Abstract

In this work, we examine the technology acceptance of Cloud computing by using the third iteration of the technology acceptance model, from now on referred to as TAM3. TAM is a well established methodology widely used for the acceptance of technology. Empirical data was analyzed from 138 Cloud developers, IT professionals and managers using factor analysis. The results indicate that user acceptance of Cloud computing can be explained and predicted by variables concerning Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Subjective Norm, Job Relevance, Image, Output quality, Result Demonstrability, Experience, Computer Self-Efficacy, Perception of external control, Cloud Anxiety, Perceived Enjoyment, Voluntariness, Intention to Use. These results further advance the theory and add to the bases for further research targeted at enhancing our knowledge of technology adoption for Cloud computing. They also provide a first base for companies and governments on how to adopt and successfully integrate Cloud technologies and specifically how users adopt Cloud technologies according to organization size, type and employee job role.

Keywords

Cloud computing Technology adoption TAM3 

References

  1. 1.
    Lohr, S.: Google and I.B.M. Join in ‘Cloud Computing’ Research. New York Times, October 2007Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armbrust, M., et al.: Above the clouds: a Berkeley view of cloud computing. Technical report, UC Berkeley Reliable Adaptive Distributed Systems Laboratory (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mell, P., Grance, T: The NIST definition of cloud computing. Technical report, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, September 2011Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P.: Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 40, 191–204 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on intervention’s. Decis. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Field, A.: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 2nd edn. Sage, London (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Comrey, A.L., Lee, H.B.: A First Course in Factor Analysis. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36(1), 157–178 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nikolopoulos, F., Likothanassis, S.: Using UTAUT2 for cloud computing technology acceptance modeling. In: Second International Conference on Internet of Things, Data and Cloud Computing, ICC 2017 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations