Advertisement

Climate Change Mitigation Through the Application of LCA Methodology on the Environmental Performance of Two Vehicles with Distinct Engines

  • Bruno Pereira
  • Radu Godina
  • João C. O. Matias
  • Susana Garrido Azevedo
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to compare the environmental performance of two internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) with distinct engines, one with the conventional diesel engine and the other with an electric motor supply (hybrid diesel) and a diesel engine, and then to assess which one has less environmental impact. The Portuguese automobile park was chosen for this study. The purpose of the comparison of the two researched ICEVs is that they show many similarities in terms of features by having the same type of body and varying only in the power-train system. The life-cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is performed by utilizing one ICEV with 170 kW. In both ICEVs the direct environmental impact is evaluated through a quantitative analysis, and a comparison is made with the purpose to assess the ICEV with the best environmental performance. The inputs and outputs data were collected from different sources and treated by the software OpenLCA for each life-cycle stage. The results have shown that the hybrid ICEV has revealed to have generally a better environmental performance compared to the diesel ICEV.

Keywords

Life-cycle assessment Environmental performance Climate change Vehicle emissions Greenhouse gases 

Bibliography

  1. Bascoul, G., Schmitt, J., & Rasolofoarison, D. (2014). Consumers’ biased perceptions of the environmental impact of products, and their influence on advertising efficiency. In The sustainable global marketplace (pp. 400–404). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Bauer, C., Hofer, J., Althaus, H.-J., Duce, A. D., & Simons, A. (2015). The environmental performance of current and future passenger vehicles: Life cycle assessment based on a novel scenario analysis framework. Applied Energy, 157, 871–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Branker, K., Jeswiet, J., & Kim, I. (2011). Greenhouse gases emitted in manufacturing a product—A new economic model. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 60(1), 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrasco, A., Ferreira, Ó., & Roelvink, D. (2016). Coastal lagoons and rising sea level: A review. Earth-Science Reviews, 154, 356–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008). The impact of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 on standardisation of social responsibility—An inside perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(1), 74–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cho, C. P., Pyo, Y. D., Jang, J. Y., Kim, G. C., & Shin, Y. J. (2017). NOx reduction and N2O emissions in a diesel engine exhaust using Fe-zeolite and vanadium based SCR catalysts. Applied Thermal Engineering, 110, 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coria, J., Bonilla, J., Grundström, M., & Pleijel, H. (2015). Air pollution dynamics and the need for temporally differentiated road pricing. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 75, 178–195.Google Scholar
  8. Crippa, M., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Guizzardi, D., & Galmarini, S. (2016). EU effect: Exporting emission standards for vehicles through the global market economy. Journal of Environmental Management, 183(3), 959–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curran, M. A. (2012). Life cycle assessment handbook: A guide for environmentally sustainable products. Beverly, MA: Scrivener Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalianis, G., Nanaki, E., Xydis, G., & Zervas, E. (2016). New aspects to greenhouse gas mitigation policies for low carbon cities. Energies, 9(3), 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danilecki, K., Mrozik, M., & Smurawski, P. (2017). Changes in the environmental profile of a popular passenger car over the last 30 years – Results of a simplified LCA study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 208–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farahani, M., Pagé, D., & Turingia, M. (2011). Sedimentation in biodiesel and ultra low sulfur diesel fuel blends. Fuel, 90, 951–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. García-Olivares, A., Solé, J., & Osychenko, O. (2018). Transportation in a 100% renewable energy system. Energy Conversion and Management, 158, 266–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Groenewald, J., Grandjean, T., & Marco, J. (2017). Accelerated energy capacity measurement of lithium-ion cells to support future circular economy strategies for electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 98–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. INE, I.P. (2012). Estatísticas dos Transportes – 2011. Lisboa: Instituto Nacional de Estatística, I.P.Google Scholar
  16. ISO. (2006). ISO 14040:2006 – Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. Geneva: ISO Copyright Office.Google Scholar
  17. Ju, K., Su, B., Zhou, D., Zhou, P., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Oil price crisis response: Capability assessment and key indicator identification. Energy, 93(2), 1353–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kałuża, A. (2016). General statistics of diesel engines’ idle time: Shunting locomotives in industrial sidings in Poland 2009…2013. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 49, 82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karakaya, E., Hidalgo, A., & Nuur, C. (2014). Diffusion of eco-innovations: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 392–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klöpffer, W., & Grahl, B. (2014). Life cycle assessment (LCA): A guide to best practice. Weinheim: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levasseur, A., et al. (2016). Enhancing life cycle impact assessment from climate science: Review of recent findings and recommendations for application to LCA. Ecological Indicators, 71, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu, B., Yan, F., Hu, J., Turkson, R., & Lin, F. (2016). Modeling and multi-objective optimization of NOx conversion efficiency and NH3 slip for a diesel engine. Sustainability, 8, 478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lu, Y.-T., Lee, Y.-M., & Hong, C.-Y. (2017). Inventory analysis and social life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from waste-to-energy incineration in Taiwan. Sustainability, 9(11), 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lullo, G. D., Zhang, H., & Kumar, A. (2016). Evaluation of uncertainty in the well-to-tank and combustion greenhouse gas emissions of various transportation fuels. Applied Energy, 184, 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MacLean, H. L., Lave, L. B., Lankey, R., & Joshi, S. (2000). A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 50(10), 1769–1779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meng, L., & Sager, J. (2017). Energy consumption and energy-related CO2 emissions from China’s petrochemical industry based on an environmental input-output life cycle assessment. Energies, 10(10), 1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nanaki, E. A., & Koroneos, C. J. (2016). Climate change mitigation and deployment of electric vehicles in urban areas. Renewable Energy, 99, 1153–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nel, R., & Nienaber, G. (2012). Tax design to reduce passenger vehicle CO2 emissions. Meditari Accountancy Research, 20(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nocera, S., & Cavallaro, F. (2016). The competitiveness of alternative transport fuels for CO2 emissions. Transport Policy, 50, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Remuzgo, L., Trueba, C., & Sarabia, J. M. (2016). Evolution of the global inequality in greenhouse gases emissions using multidimensional generalized entropy measures. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 444, 146–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reşitoğlu, İ. A., Altinişik, K., & Keskin, A. (2015). The pollutant emissions from diesel-engine vehicles and exhaust aftertreatment systems. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tagliaferri, C., et al. (2016). Life cycle assessment of future electric and hybrid vehicles: A cradle-to-grave systems engineering approach. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 112, 298–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vieira, D. R., Calmon, J. L., & Coelho, F. Z. (2016). Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the manufacturing of common and ecological concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 124, 656–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. WHO. (2009). Global health risks – Estimated deaths & Dalys attributable to selected environmental risk factors. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruno Pereira
    • 1
  • Radu Godina
    • 2
  • João C. O. Matias
    • 3
  • Susana Garrido Azevedo
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Electromechanical EngineeringUniversity of Beira Interior, Edifício I Das EngenhariasCovilhãPortugal
  2. 2.C-MAST—Department of Electromechanical EngineeringUniversity of Beira Interior, Edifício I Das EngenhariasCovilhãPortugal
  3. 3.Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism DepartmentGOVCOPP – The Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies, C-MAST—UBI, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de SantiagoAveiroPortugal
  4. 4.CEFAGE-UBI Unit Research, Management and Economics DepartmentUniversity of Beira InteriorCovilhãPortugal

Personalised recommendations