Advertisement

A Comprehensive Study of Game Theory Applications for Smart Grids, Demand side Management Programs and Transportation Networks

  • Ali MohammadiEmail author
  • Sanaz Rabinia
Chapter

Abstract

Game theory is a powerful analytical tool for modeling decision makers strategies, behaviors and interactions. A Decision maker’s act and decisions can benefit or negatively impact other decision makers interests. Game theory has been broadly used in economics, politics and engineering field. For example, game theory can model decision making procedure of different companies competing with each other to maximize their profit.

In this chapter, we present a brief introduction of game theory formulation and its applications. The focus of chapter is noncooperative Stackelberg game model and its applications in solving power system related problems. These applications include but not limited to; expanding transmission network, improving power system reliability, containing market power in the electricity market, solving power system dispatch, executing demand response and allocating resource in a wireless system. Finally, this chapter elaborates on solving a game theory problem through an example.

Keywords

Game theory Stackelberg game Nash equilibrium Utility function Smart Grid Demand response Demand-side management 

References

  1. 1.
    S. Mei, W. Wei, and F. Liu, “On engineering game theory with its application in power systems,” Control Theory and Technology, vol. 15, pp. 1–12, 2017.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Singh and X. Vives, “Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly,” The RAND Journal of Economics, pp. 546–554, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. F. Hobbs, C. B. Metzler, and J.-S. Pang, “Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: An MPEC approach,” IEEE transactions on power systems, vol. 15, pp. 638–645, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    X. Hu and D. Ralph, “Using EPECs to model bilevel games in restructured electricity markets with locational prices,” Operations research, vol. 55, pp. 809–827, 2007.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Mohammadi and M. J. Dehghani, “Spectrum allocation using fuzzy logic with optimal power in wireless network,” in Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE), 2014 4th International eConference on, 2014, pp. 532–536.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Mei, W. Guo, Y. Wang, F. Liu, and W. Wei, “A game model for robust optimization of power systems and its application,” Proceedings of the CSEE, vol. 33, pp. 47–56, 2013.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Wei, “Power System Robust Dispatch: Models and Applications,” Tsinghua University, 2013.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. H. Zare, J. S. Borrero, B. Zeng, and O. A. Prokopyev, “A note on linearized reformulations for a class of bilevel linear integer problems,” Annals of Operations Research, pp. 1–19, 2017.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. H. Zare, O. Y. Özaltın, and O. A. Prokopyev, “On a class of bilevel linear mixed-integer programs in adversarial settings,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 71, pp. 91–113, 2018.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. W. Weaver and P. T. Krein, “Game-theoretic control of small-scale power systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 24, pp. 1560–1567, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Chen, R. Ye, X. Wang, and R. Lu, “Cooperative control of power system load and frequency by using differential games,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 23, pp. 882–897, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Tohidi and M. R. Hesamzadeh, “Multi-regional transmission planning as a non-cooperative decision-making,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, pp. 2662–2671, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Wang, Y. Wu, and K. R. Liu, “Game theory for cognitive radio networks: An overview,” Computer networks, vol. 54, pp. 2537–2561, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. R. Liu and B. Wang, Cognitive radio networking and security: A game-theoretic view: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Felegyhazi and J.-P. Hubaux, “Game theory in wireless networks: A tutorial,” 2006.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Milgrom and J. Roberts, “Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 1255–1277, 1990.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Mohammadi, M. J. Dehghani, and E. Ghazizadeh, “Game Theoretic Spectrum Allocation in Femtocell Networks for Smart Electric Distribution Grids,” Energies, vol. 11, pp. 1–18, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations