Advertisement

Survey of Some General Properties of Meromorphic Functions in a Given Domain

  • G. BarsegianEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Trends in Mathematics book series (TM)

Abstract

The first classical results (principles) related to arbitrary analytic (meromorphic) functions w in a given domain were obtained by Cauchy in 1814–1831, while the next principles had arisen much later, in Ahlfors theory of covering surfaces created in 1935.

In this survey we present some other (diverse type) results of the same generality which were obtained since 1970s.

Previously the most attention was paid to meromorphic functions in the complex plane or in the disks, which were studied in details in the classical Nevanlinna value distribution theory. The results of this survey complement this theory by discovering some new type of phenomena or regularities and, unlike Nevanlinna theory, the result cover all meromorphic functions, including, the most important in application, functions in a given domain.

Some of these results found already applications in other topics, for instance in geometry and complex equations. Meantime the results were presented earlier in some papers devoted to value distribution. Respectively many experts working in other fields are not familiar with them.

The aim of this survey is to facilitate further applications of these results, by presenting them as a collection of some separate formulas or some “ready to use” tools. This will enable to apply these formulas without entering into details and interrelations of these formulas with other topics.

Keywords

Meromorphic functions in a domain Nevanlinna theory Ahlfors theory Gamma-lines Level sets Estimates of derivatives Geometric deficiencies Universal version of value distribution 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

30A10 30A99 30C99 30D30 30D35 30D99 30F99 30G99 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Marie Curie (IIF) award. The author thanks the referee for careful checking.

References

  1. 1.
    L. Ahlfors, Untezuchungen zur Theorie der Konformen Abbildungen und ganze Funkzionen. Acta Soc. Sci. Fenn. 1(9), 1–40 (1930)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Ahlfors, Zur Theorie der Überlagerungsflachen. Acta Math. 65, 157–194 (1935)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Barsegian, Deficient values and the structure of covering surfaces. Izvestia Acad. Nauk Armenii 12, 46–53 (1977) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Barsegian, New results in the theory of meromorphic functions. Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR 238(4), 777–780 (1978) (in Russian, translated in Soviet Math. Dokl.)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Barsegian, On geometric structure of image of disks under mappings by meromorphic functions. Math. Sbornik 106(148)(1), 35–43 (1978)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Barsegian, On the geometry of meromorphic functions. Mathem. sbornic 114(156)(2), 179–226 (1981) (in Russian, translated in Math. USSR Sbornic)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Barsegian, Exceptional values associated with logarithmic derivatives of meromorphic functions. Izvestia Acad. Nauk Armenii 16(5), 408–423 (1981)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Barsegian, Estimates of derivatives of meromorphic functions on sets of a-points. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 34(3), 534–540 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Barsegian, Tangent variation principle in complex analysis. Izvestia Acad.Nauk Armenii 27(3), 37–60 (1992) (in Russian, translated in Journal Cont. Math. Anal., Allerton Press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Barsegian, Estimates of higher derivatives of meromorphic functions on sets of its a-points. Bull. Honk Kong Math. Soc. 2(2), 341–346 (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Barsegian, Gamma-Lines: On the Geometry of Real and Complex Functions (Taylor and Francis, London, New York, 2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Barsegian, Some interrelated results in different branches of geometry and analysis, in Further Progress in Analysis (World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NJ, 2009), pp. 3–32zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Barsegian, An universal value distribution for arbitrary meromorphic functions in a given domain, in Progress in Analysis and Its Applications (World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NJ, 2010), pp. 123–128zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Barsegian, A new principle for arbitrary meromorphic functions in a given domain. Georgian Math. J. 25(2), 181–186 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/gmj-2018-0032 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Barsegian, D.T. Lê, On a topological property of multi-valued solutions of some general classes of complex differential equations. Complex Variables Theory Appl. 50(5), 307–318 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Barsegian, G. Sukiasyan, Methods for study level sets of enough smooth functions, analysis and applications, in “Topics in Analysis and Applications”: the “NATO Advanced Research Workshop, August 2002, Yerevan”, Series, ed. by G. Barsegian, H. Begehr (NATO Science Publications, Kluwer, 2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Barsegian, W. Yuan, On some generalized Painlevé and Hayman type equations with meromorphic solutions in a bounded domain. Georgian Math. J. 25(2), 187–194 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/gmj-2018-0033 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Barsegian, I. Laine, D.T. Lê, On topological behavior of solutions of some algebraic differential equations. Complex Variables Elliptic Equ. 53, 411–421 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Barsegyan, A proximity property of the a-points of meromorphic functions. Mat. Sb. 120(162), 42–67 (1983); Math. USSR-Sb. 48, 41–63 (1984)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Barsegyan, The property of closeness of a-points of meromorphic functions and the structure of univalent domains of Riemann surfaces. Izv. Akad. Nauk Armyan. SSR Ser. Mat. 20(6), 407–425 (1985) (Russian, with English and Armenian summaries)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. Hayman, Picard values of meromorphic functions and their derivatives. Ann. Math. 70(2), 9–42 (1959)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. Hayman, J.M. Wu, Level sets of univalent functions. Comment. Math. Helf. 56(3), 366–403 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Hilbert, Mathematische Probleme, Vortrag, gehalten auf dem internationalen Mathematiker-Kongress zu Paris 1900; Archiv der Mathematik und Physik, 3rd series, 1, 44–63, 213–237Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Miles, Bounds on the ratio sup n(r, a)∕A(r) for meromorphic functions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 162, 383–393 (1971)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. Nevanlinna, Eindeutige analytische Funktionen (Springer, New York, 1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. Valiron, Fonctions entières d’ordre fini et fonctions méromorphes. Enseignement Mathématique”, No. 8, Institut de Mathématiques, Université, Genève, 1960, 150 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of MathematicsNational Academy of SciencesYerevanArmenia

Personalised recommendations