Complexity, Inquiry Critical Thinking, and Technology: A Holistic and Developmental Approach
Among the skill and competency areas being addressed in national education plans and by prominent educators are collaboration, communication, creativity, and critical thinking. In this chapter, a fifth C is added to that list—namely, contemplation. The argument to be presented in this chapter involves two assumptions: (a) technologies can play an important role in developing these competencies, and (b) to be effective in developing the five C’s, a holistic and developmental approach seems appropriate. Given those assumptions, the solution approach here is that a learner should be considered as a whole person and not simply a cognitive processor. Moreover, promoting effective learning involves developing stable and persistent changes in what a person knows and can do. Consequently, developing habits of inquiry and reasoning takes time and is not likely to happen in one unit of instruction, nor in one course. The earlier those habits are developed, the more likely they are to persist and to be applied to multiple domains of inquiry.
KeywordsCritical thinking Inquiry habits Technology affordances
Support from a yumber of colleagues at NetDragon, East China Normal University, Beijing Normal University and the University of North Texas have contributed many ideas reflected in this chapter.
- Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school (expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Research Council. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/9853/chapter/1.
- Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1988). Situated cognition and the culture of learning (Report No. IRL 88-0008). Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.Google Scholar
- Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–493). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi.Google Scholar
- Dörner, D. (1996). The logic of failure: Recognizing and avoiding effort in complex situations (R. Kimber & R. Kimber, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
- Ifenthaler, D., Kinshuk, Isaias, P., Sampson, D. G., & Spector, J. M. (Eds.). (2011). Multiple perspectives on problem solving and learning in the digital age. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- McNamara, H., & Boudreau, J. D. (2011). Teaching whole person care in medical school. In T. A. Hutchinson (Ed.), Whole person care (pp. 183–200). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Merrill, M. D. (2013). First principles of instruction: Identifying and designing effective, efficient and engaging instruction. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
- Milrad, M., Spector, J. M., & Davidsen, P. I. (2003). Model facilitated learning. In S. Naidu (Ed.), Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp. 13–27). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2010). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and tools. Dillon Beach: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press. Retrieved from https://www.criticalthinking.org/files/Concepts_Tools.pdf.Google Scholar
- Rogers, C. R. (1965). The place of the person in the new world of the behavioral sciences. In F. T. Stevens (Ed.), Humanistic viewpoints in psychology: A book of readings (pp. 387–407). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Spector, J. M. (2016). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Spector, J. M., & Park, S. W. (2018). Motivation, learning and technology: Embodied educational motivation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Tiruneh, D. T., de Cock, M., Spector, J. M., Gu, X., & Elen, J. (2017). Toward a systematic and model-based approach to design learning environments for critical thinking. In J. M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy. New York: Springer.Google Scholar