Dickens: The Cannibal Cannibalised

  • Tammy Lai-Ming Ho


This chapter reads Gaynor Arnold’s Girl in a Blue Dress (2008) which cannibalises Charles Dickens’ biography to facilitate its discussion of topics including gender and sexuality. Arnold seeks to emulate the accomplishments of the Victorian author (communion) but she is also eager to put forward revisionist ideologies that differentiate and individuate her from her literary ancestor (identity-formation). These conflicting motivations of incorporation are manifest in what I call an ‘aggressive ambivalence’ towards Dickens, especially in his portrayal as a cannibal in the novel. Although Arnold’s use of Dickens raises certain ethical issues, the writer succeeds in simultaneously appropriating the influence of Dickens and creating her own intriguing and redemptive fictions that centre on the theme of cannibalism.


Adaptation Biofiction Cannibalism Charles Dickens Neo-Victorian Victorian 


  1. Armstrong, Isobel. Victorian Poetry: Poetry, Poetics, Politics. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, Gaynor. Girl in a Blue Dress. Birmingham: Tindal Street Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. Barndollar, David and Susan Schorn. ‘Revisiting the Serial Format of Dickens’ Novels; or, Little Dorrit Goes a Long Way’. In Christine L. Krueger (ed.), Functions of Victorian Culture at the Present Time. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 2002, pp. 157–170.Google Scholar
  4. Benjamin, Melanie. Alice I Have Been. New York: Delacorte Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  5. Birch, Dinah. ‘Young, Pleasant, Cheerful, Tidy, Bustling, Quiet’. London Review of Books 33:3 (3 February 2011): pp. 25–28.Google Scholar
  6. Bowen, W. H. Charles Dickens and His Family: A Sympathetic Study. Cambridge: Heffer, 1956.Google Scholar
  7. Byatt, A.S. Possession: A Romance. London: Vintage, 1991 [1990].Google Scholar
  8. Callow, Simon. ‘The Best Loved Man in Britain’. The Guardian, 19 October 2009.
  9. Carey, Peter. Jack Maggs. London: Faber & Faber, 1998 [1997].Google Scholar
  10. Clayton, Jay. Charles Dickens in Cyberspace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  11. Coar, Lisa. ‘Sugar and Spice and All Things Nice: The Victorian Woman’s All-Consuming Predicament’. Victorian Network 4:1 (Summer 2012): pp. 48–72.Google Scholar
  12. Cokal, Susann. ‘Bleak Housekeeping’. The New York Times, 8 July 2009.
  13. Flanagan, Richard. Wanting. London: Atlantic Books, 2009 [2008].Google Scholar
  14. Gilbert, Sandra M. and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 2000 [1979].Google Scholar
  15. Gilmour, Robin. ‘Using the Victorians: The Victorian Age in Contemporary Fiction’. In Alice Jenkins and Juliet John (eds.), Rereading Victorian Fiction. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000, pp. 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gruß, Susanne. ‘Bleak London: (Neo-)Dickensian Psychogeographies’. Spatial Practices 23 (2016): pp. 74–90.Google Scholar
  17. Guest, Kristen. ‘Introduction: Cannibalism and the Boundaries of Identity’. In Kristen Guest (ed.), Eating Their Words: Cannibalism and the Boundaries of Cultural Identity. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  18. Gutleben, Christian. Nostalgic Postmodernism: The Victorian Tradition and the Contemporary British Novel. Amsterdam; New York: Rodopi, 2001.Google Scholar
  19. Hadley, Louisa. Neo-Victorian Fiction and Historical Narrative: The Victorians and Us. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heilmann, Ann and Mark Llewellyn. Neo-Victorianism: The Victorians in the Twenty-First Century, 1999–2009. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Joyce, Simon. Victorians in the Rearview Mirror. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  22. Kaplan, Cora. Victoriana: Histories, Fictions, Criticism. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. ‘Neo-Victorian Dickens’. In Sally Ledger and Holly Furneaux (eds.), Charles Dickens in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaplan, Fred. Dickens: A Biography. New York: Morrow, 1988.Google Scholar
  25. Kilgour, Maggie. From Communion to Cannibalism: An Anatomy of Metaphors of Incorporation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Letissier, Georges. ‘Dickens and Post-Victorian Fiction’. In Susana Onega and Christian Gutleben (eds.), Refracting the Canon in Contemporary British Literature and Film. Amsterdam; New York: Rodopi, 2004, pp. 111–128.Google Scholar
  27. Llewellyn, Mark. ‘“Perfectly Innocent, Natural, Playful”: Incest in Neo-Victorian Women’s Writing’. In Marie-Luise Kohlke and Christian Gutleben (eds.), Neo-Victorian Tropes of Trauma: The Politics of Bearing After-Witness to Nineteenth-Century Suffering. Amsterdam; New York: Rodopi, 2010, pp. 133–160.Google Scholar
  28. Lonoff, Sue. ‘Disseminating Victorian Culture in the Postmillennial Classroom’. In Christine L. Krueger (ed.), Functions of Victorian Culture at the Present Time. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 2002, pp. 171–185.Google Scholar
  29. Malone, Michael. ‘The Spirit of Dickens Present’. The New York Times, 4 March 1990.
  30. Marshall, Gail. ‘Victorian Shakespeare’. Literature Compass 2 (2005): pp. 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKay, Sinclair. ‘Review: Girl in a Blue Dress by Gaynor Arnold’. The Daily Telegraph, 23 August 2008.
  32. Mukherjee, Ankhi. ‘Missed Encounters: Repetition, Rewriting, and Contemporary Returns to Charles Dickens’ Great Expectations’. Contemporary Literature 46:1 (2005): pp. 108–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Onega, Susana. ‘The Symbol Made Text: Charles Palliser’s Postmodernist Re-writing of Dickens in The Quincunx’. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 6 (1993): pp. 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Orwell, George. Critical Essays. London: Secker and Warburg, 1946.Google Scholar
  35. Palmer, J. William. The Detective and Mr. Dickens. New York: Ballantine Books, 1990.Google Scholar
  36. ———. ‘Victorian Visits to Our Mutual Friend’. The Independent, 29 August 2008.
  37. Perkin, J. Russell. ‘John Lanchester’s Capital: A Dickensian Examination of the Condition of England’. Journal of Modern Literature 41:1 (Fall 2017): pp. 100–117.Google Scholar
  38. Pykett, Lyn. Charles Dickens. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pyrhönen, Heta. Bluebeard Gothic: Jane Eyre and its Progeny. Toronto; Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  40. Rodensky, Lisa. ‘Discovering a Meaningful Life’. In Women’s Review of Books, May/June 2011.
  41. Rollyson, Carl E. A Higher Form of Cannibalism? Adventures in the Art and Politics of Biography. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2005.Google Scholar
  42. Schor, Hilary M. Dickens and the Daughter of the House. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  43. Simpson, Helen. Introduction to Angela Carter, The Bloody Chamber. London: Vintage, 2006 [1995].Google Scholar
  44. Slater, Michael. Dickens and Women. London: Dent, 1983.Google Scholar
  45. ———. Charles Dickens: A Life Defined by Writing. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  46. Stone, Harry. The Night Side of Dickens: Cannibalism, Passion, Necessity. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  47. Sutherland, John. ‘Paliography’. London Review of Books 10:16 (15 September 1988): pp. 22–23.Google Scholar
  48. ———. ‘Nelly Gets Her Due’. London Review of Books 12:21 (November 1990): pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
  49. Thieme, John. Postcolonial Con-texts: Writing Back to the Canon. London; New York: Continuum, 2001.Google Scholar
  50. Tomalin, Claire. Charles Dickens: A Life. London: Viking, 2011.Google Scholar
  51. Watt, Ian. ‘Oral Dickens’. Dickens Studies Annual 3 (1974): pp. 165–181.Google Scholar
  52. Warner, Marina. From the Beast to the Blonde: On Fairy Tales and Their Tellers. London: Chatto & Windus, 1994.Google Scholar
  53. ———. Signs & Wonders: Essays on Literature & Culture. London: Vintage, 2004 [2003].Google Scholar
  54. Williamson, Geordie. ‘Solitary Giant’. The Weekend Australian (February 4–5, 2012): pp. 22–23. Google Scholar
  55. Wilson, Edmund. Foreword to Dickens & Ellen Ternan. Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1952, pp. vii–xii.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tammy Lai-Ming Ho
    • 1
  1. 1.Hong Kong Baptist UniversityKowloon TongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations