Advertisement

Exclusion as Lack of Redistribution: School Segregation as a Paradigm

  • Aina Tarabini
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides empirical analysis of one of the main processes of educational exclusion: school segregation as evidence of lack of redistribution. The purpose is to demonstrate that the dynamics of educational failure and ESL cannot be properly understood without factoring in a school’s social composition. Specifically, the chapter discusses the impacts of school segregation upon the lived experiences of teachers and students in secondary schools. In the first part of the chapter, the focus is on teachers and in particular on the feelings of despair, frustration, and demotivation that are often engendered in school settings that are facing many challenges. The second revolves around students and especially around the subjective impacts of the peer effect on their ability to imagine and reach a future far removed from the risk of ESL.

Keywords

Early school leaving Educational exclusion Redistribution School segregation Peer effect 

References

  1. Alegre, M. A. (2010). Casi-mercados, segregación escolar y desigualdad educativa: una trilogía con final abierto. Educaçao e Sociedade, 31(113), 1157–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alegre, M. A., & Ferrer-Esteban, G. (2010). School Regimes and Education Equity: Some Insights Based on PISA 2006. British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 433–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, S., Macrae, S., & Maguire, M. (2001). Choice, Pathways and Transitions Post-16. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonal, X. (2012). Education Policy and School Segregation of Migrant Students in Catalonia: The Politics of Non-decision-making. Journal of Education Policy, 27(3), 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonal, X. (Dir.). (2015). Equitat i resultats educatius a Catalunya. Una mirada a partir de PISA 2012. Barcelona: Fundació Jaume Bofill.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, R. (2007). Friends, Peers and Higher Education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(6), 693–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demanet, J., & Van Houtte, M. (2012). Teachers’ Attitudes and Students’ Opposition. School Misconduct as a Reaction to Teachers’ Diminished Effort and Affect. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 860–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demanet, J., & Van Houtte, M. (2013). School Belonging and School Misconduct: The Differing Role of Teacher and Peer Attachment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demeuse, M. (2004). A Set of Equity Indicators of the European Education Systems. In L. Moreno Herrera & G. Francia. Educational Policies. Implications for Equity, Equality and Equivalence (pp. 44–57). Reports from the Department of Education. Orebro, Sweden: Orebro University.Google Scholar
  10. Dronkers, J., & Levels, M. (2006, May 11–14). Social-Economic and Ethnic School-Segregation in Europe and Australia and Educational Achievement of Migrant-Pupils Coming from Various Regions of Origins. Paper presented at the Spring Meeting 2006 of the ISA Research Committee on Social Stratification and Mobility. Intergenerational Transmissions: Cultural, Economic or Social Resources? Nijmegen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  11. Dumay, X., & Dupriez, V. (2007). Does the School Composition Effect Matter? Some Methodological and Conceptual Considerations. HAL Archives. Disponible aquí. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00561939.
  12. Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2014). Navigating Change: A Typology of Student Transition in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 734–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hargreaves, A. (2001). Emotional Geographies of Teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1056–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Janmaat, J. G. (2014). Do Ethnically Mixed Classrooms Promote Inclusive Attitudes Towards Immigrants Everywhere? A Study Among Native Adolescents in 14 Countries. European Sociological Review, 30(6), 810–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lingard, B., Mills, M., & Hayes, D. (2006). Enabling and Aligning Assessment for Learning: Some Research and Policy Lessons from Queensland. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 16(2), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lupton, R. (2005). Social Justice and School Improvement: Improving the Quality of Schooling in the Poorest Neighbourhoods. British Educational Research Journal, 31, 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lynch, K., & Baker, J. (2005). Equality in Education an Equality of Condition Perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 3(2), 131–164.Google Scholar
  18. Meo, A., & Parker, A. (2004). Teachers, Teaching and Educational Exclusion: Pupil Referral Units and Pedagogic Practice. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(1), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reay, D. (2018). Misseducation: Inequality, Education and the Working Classes. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  20. Reay, D., David, M., & Ball, S. (2001). Making a Difference? Institutional Habituses and Higher Education Choice. Sociological Research Online, 5(4), 126–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tarabini, A., Curran, M., Castejón, A., & Montes, A. (2018). Framing Youth Educational Choices at the End of Compulsory Schooling: The Catalan Case. In A. Tarabini & N. Ingram (Eds.), Educational Choices, Transitions and Aspirations in Europe: Systemic, Institutional and Subjective Challenges. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools Making a Difference: Let’s be Realistic! Londres: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Van Houtte, M. (2011). So Where’s the Teacher in School Effects Research? The Impact of Teachers’ Beliefs, Culture, and Behavior on Equity and Excellence in Education. In K. Van den Branden, P. Van Avermaet, & M. Van Houtte (Eds.), Equity and Excellence in Education: Towards Maximal Learning Opportunities for All Students (pp. 75–95). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Van Maele, D., & Van Houtte, M. (2009). Faculty Trust and Organizational School Characteristics: An Exploration Across Secondary Schools in Flanders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 556–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aina Tarabini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyAutonomous University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations