Field Normalization of Scientometric Indicators
When scientometric indicators are used to compare research units active in different scientific fields, there is often a need to make corrections for differences between fields, for instance, differences in publication, collaboration, and citation practices. Field-normalized indicators aim to make such corrections. The design of these indicators is a significant challenge. We discuss the main issues in the design of field-normalized indicators and present an overview of the different approaches that have been developed for dealing with the problem of field normalization. We also discuss how field-normalized indicators can be evaluated and consider the sensitivity of scientometric analyses to the choice of a field-normalization approach.
The authors would like to thank Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild, Loet Leydesdorff, Javier Ruiz-Castillo, and an anonymous referee for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this chapter. These comments have led to numerous improvements.
- É. Archambault, O.H. Beauchesne, J. Caruso: Towards a multilingual, comprehensive and open scientific journal ontology. In: Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Int. Soc. Sci. Informetr., Durban, South Africa, ed. by E.C.M. Noyons, P. Ngulube, J. Leta (2011) pp. 66–77Google Scholar
- A.F.J. van Raan: Measuring science: Capita selecta of current main issues. In: Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, ed. by H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (Springer, Dordrecht 2005) pp. 19–50Google Scholar
- A.I. Pudovkin, E. Garfield: Percentile rank and author superiority indexes for evaluating individual journal articles and the author's overall citation performance, COLLNET J. Sci. Inf. Manag. 3(2), 3–10 (2009)Google Scholar
- L. Waltman, E. Yan: PageRank-related methods for analyzing citation networks. In: Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice, ed. by Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, D. Wolfram (Springer, Cham 2014) pp. 83–100Google Scholar
- D. Aksnes, G. Sivertsen, T.N. van Leeuwen, K.K. Wendt: Measuring the productivity of national R&D systems: Challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicators, Sci. Pub. Policy 44(2), 246–258 (2017)Google Scholar
- H.F. Moed: Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Springer, Dordrecht 2005)Google Scholar
- L. Waltman, N.J. van Eck: The need for contextualized scientometric analysis: An opinion paper. In: Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Sci. Technol. Indic, ed. by I. Rafols, J. Molas-Gallart, E. Castro-Martínez, R. Woolley (2016) pp. 541–549Google Scholar