Advertisement

Innovative Design Thinking Process with TRIZ

  • Kyeongwon LeeEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 541)

Abstract

This paper describes an innovative design thinking process with simplified TRIZ that can be used to resolve contradictions in all domains with words such as “dilemma”, “conflict”, “contradiction” and “paradox”. The design thinking process that have been used at d.school at Stanford and Potsdam University are popular as a human-centered innovation process with “Empathy” and “Define” stages for human-centered problem finding. However, many results may be not innovative because it uses mostly “Group brainstorming” at “Ideate” stage.

TRIZ users have complained that the Russian conventional TRIZ is so difficult to learn and apply. They consider that it is useful in manufacturing and mechanical fields mostly. This paper suggests an innovative design thinking process with simplified and generally usable the step-by-step TRIZ. Its effectiveness of the innovative design thinking process with the simplified and step-by-step general TRIZ is explained in the development case study, a smart wind free air conditioner.

Keywords

Innovative design thinking Simplified TRIZ Step-by-step TRIZ 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was partially supported by the Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (KOFAC) and Korea Institute of Design Promotion (KIDP) grant funded by the Korea government, respectively.

References

  1. 1.
    Hentschel, C., Czinki, A.: Design thinking as a door-opener for TRIZ-paving the way towards systematic innovation. In: TRIZ Future Conference 2013, Paris, France (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thoring, K., Müller, R.M.: Understanding the creative mechanisms of design thinking: an evolutionary approach. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 19–21 October 2011, pp. 137–147 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dabholkar, V.: Design thinking vs TRIZ: A panel discussion, on July, 5 as a part of Next Gear Workshop, Catalign Innovation Consulting (2012). www.catalign.com
  4. 4.
    Gray, C.M., et al.: What is the content of “design thinking”? Design heuristics as conceptual repertoire. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 32 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    d.school of Stanford University. http://dschool.stanford.edu. Accessed 14 Apr 2018
  6. 6.
    Lee, K.: Simple TRIZ process “Quick TRIZ 2014” for non-technical fields with resolving the dilemma in business, service, government policy and social conflicts systematically. In: Proceedings of 14th ETRIA World Conference TRIZ Future 2014, Lausanne, 29–31 October (2014). J. Eur. TRIZ Assoc. INNOVATOR. ISSN 1866-4180, 01/2014 Volume 01, pp. 110–112 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ries, E.: Lean startup, The lean startup: how today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically success, 1st edn. Currency (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, J.-Y.: Thinking wind free air conditioner with Design Thinking, KOSCA (KOrea Society of Creativity Application, www.kosca.net) Domestic Fall Conference 2016, Seoul (2016)

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Design EngineeringKorea Polytechnic UniversitySiheung CityKorea

Personalised recommendations