Advertisement

Introduction: Organizational Theories and an Overview of Research Findings

  • Morgan R. Clevenger
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter overviews inter-organizational relationships and the specific type of interactions by higher education with the for-profit world. Additionally, Cone’s (2010, The new era of global corporate citizenship & compliance. Presentation at Net Impact Conference, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) corporate citizenship spectrum is discussed as a framing for the work. This chapter explores the purpose and background for the need of this research, the theories behind inter-organizational functionality, and an overview of key themes in the findings.

References

  1. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1968). Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. American Sociological Review, 33(6), 912–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich, H. E. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Arulampalam, W., & Stoneman, P. (1995). An investigation into the givings by large corporate donors to UK charities, 1979–86. Applied Economics, 27, 935–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney, J. B., Ketchen Jr., D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bliese, P. D., Chan, D., & Ployhart, R. E. (2007). Multilevel methods: Future directions in measurement, longitudinal analyses, and nonnormal outcomes. Organizational Research Methods, 10(4), 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bright, D. S., Fry, R. E., & Cooperrider, D. L. (2006). Transformative innovations for the mutual benefit of business, society, and environment. BAWB Interactive Working Paper Series, 1(1), 17–33.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, M. C. (2004). Making the case for corporate philanthropy: A key element of success. In H. P. Karoff (Ed.), Just money: A critique of contemporary American philanthropy (pp. 151–164). Boston, MA: TPI Editions.Google Scholar
  9. Bruch, H., & Walter, F. (2005). The keys to rethinking corporate philanthropy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 48–55.Google Scholar
  10. Bush, V. (1945). Science, the endless frontier: A report to the president. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2017). Business & society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management (10th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
  13. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research, and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ciconte, B. L., & Jacob, J. G. (2009). Fundraising basics: A complete guide (3rd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
  15. Clevenger, M. R. (2014). An organizational analysis of the inter-organizational relationships between a public American higher education university and six United States corporate supporters: An instrumental, ethnographic case study using Cone’s corporate citizenship spectrum. ProQuest published doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO. Retrieved from https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/45866
  16. Clevenger, M. R., & MacGregor, C. J. (2019). Business and corporation engagement with higher education: Models, theories, and best practices. Bingley, UK: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cone, C. (2010, October 27). The new era of global corporate citizenship & compliance. Presentation at Net Impact Conference, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  18. Crane, A., & Glozer, S. (2016). Researching corporate social responsibility communication: Themes, opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1223–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  20. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Cropper, S., Ebers, M., Huxham, C., & Ring, P. S. (Eds.). (2008). The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Crow, M. M., & Dabars, W. B. (2015). Designing the new American University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  23. Curti, M., & Nash, R. (1965). Philanthropy in the shaping of American higher education. Rahway, NJ: Quinn & Boden Company.Google Scholar
  24. Ebers, M. (1999). The dynamics of inter-organizational relationships. Sociology of Organizations, 16, 31–56.Google Scholar
  25. Eddy, P. L. (2010). Partnerships and collaborations in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 36(2). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Edwards, M. (2008). Just another emperor? The myths and realities of philanthrocapitalism. New York, NY: Demos.Google Scholar
  27. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Evan, W. M. (1965). Toward a theory of inter-organizational relations. Management Science, 11(10), B217–B230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fischer, M. (2000). Ethical decision making in fund raising. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Frynas, J. G., & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(3), 258–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Garber, R. (2017). Academic-corporate engagement: Strategic and organizational best practices. Research. Management Review, 22(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  32. Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. J. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Giroux, H. A., & Giroux, S. S. (2004). Take back higher education: Race, youth, and the crisis of democracy in the post-civil rights era. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2018). Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/Pages/FeaturedReportList.aspx
  36. Gould, E. (2003). The university in a corporate culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Greenberg, D., McKone-Sweet, K., & Wilson, H. J. (2011). The new entrepreneurial leader: Developing leaders who shape social and economic opportunity. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  38. Guetzkow, H. (1966). Relations among organizations. In R. V. Bowers (Ed.), Studies on behavior in organizations: A research symposium (pp. 13–44). Athens, GA: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  39. Hall, P. D. (2001). Inventing the nonprofit sector. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  40. Hatakeyama, K., & Ruppel, D. (2004, June 27–30). Sábato’s triangle and international academic cooperation: The importance of extra-relations for the Latin American enhancement. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education and Research “Progress through Partnership,” Olomouc and Bouzov Castle, Czech Republic. Retrieved from http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEER2004/Proceedings/papers/0535.pdf
  41. Hunt, J. (2018). University of Nike: How corporate cash bought American higher education. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.Google Scholar
  42. Jacoby, N. H. (1973). Corporate power and social responsibility. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Johnson, R. A., Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1964). Systems theory and management. Management Science, 10(2), 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johnson, W. C. (2006). Challenges in university-industry collaborations. In L. E. Weber & J. J. Duderstadt (Eds.), Universities and business: Partnering for the knowledge society (pp. 211–222). London: Economica Ltd..Google Scholar
  45. Kaplan, A. E. (2018). 2017 voluntary support of education survey. New York, NY: Council for Aid to Education.Google Scholar
  46. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (2005). Organizations and the system concept. In J. Shafritz, J. Ott, & Y. Jang (Eds.), Classics of organization theory (6th ed., pp. 480–490). Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  47. Levy, B. R., & Cherry, R. L. (Eds.). (1996). The NSFRE fund-raising dictionary. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  48. McClure, K. R. (2014). Beyond academic capitalism: Innovation and entrepreneurship as institutional ethos at a public research university. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
  49. McDonnell, M.-H., King, B. G., & Soule, S. A. (2015). A dynamic process model of private politics: Activist targeting and corporate receptivity to social changes. American Sociological Association, 80(3), 654–678.Google Scholar
  50. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  51. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Molnar, A. (2002). The corporate branding of our schools. Educational Leadership, 60(2), 74–78.Google Scholar
  53. Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). (2017a). Table 21. Higher education R&D expenditures, ranked by all R&D expenditures, by source of funds: FY 2017 (Dollars in thousands) from higher education research and development survey: Fiscal year 2017. Retrieved from National Science Foundation at https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/herd/2017/index.html
  55. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). (2017b). Table 1. Higher education R&D expenditures, by source of funds: FYs 1953–2017 (Dollars in millions) from higher education research and development survey: Fiscal year 2017. Retrieved from National Science Foundation at https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/herd/2017/html/herd2017_dst_01.html
  56. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rhodes, F. H. T. (2001). The creation of the future: The role of the American University. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  59. Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.Google Scholar
  60. Robbins, S., & Stylianou, A. C. (2003). Global corporate web sites: An empirical investigation of content and design. Information & Management, 40, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rosen, M. (1991). Coming to terms with the field: Understanding and doing organizational ethnography. Journal of Management Studies, 28(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sanzone, C. S. (2000). Securing corporate support: The business of corporate relations. In P. Buchanan (Ed.), Handbook of institutional advancement (3rd ed., pp. 321–324). Washington, DC: CASE.Google Scholar
  63. Saul, J. (2011). The end of fundraising: Raise more money selling your impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  64. Shafritz, J. M., Ott, J. S., & Jang, Y. S. (2005). Classics of organization theory (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  65. Siegel, D. (2007). Constructive engagement with the corporation. Academe, 93(6), 52–55.Google Scholar
  66. Siegel, D. (2008). Framing involvement: Rationale construction in an inter-organizational collaboration. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(3), 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Siegel, D. (2012). Beyond the academic-corporate divide. Academe, 98(1), 29–31.Google Scholar
  68. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Solórzano, A. (2017). Giving in numbers: 2017 edition. New York, NY: Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy.Google Scholar
  71. Sommerville, C. J. (2009). Universities are corporatized because they are secularized. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(39), omm.Google Scholar
  72. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  73. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Stein, D. G. (2004). Buying in or selling out? The commercialization of the American research university. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Tedlock, B. (2000). Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 455–486). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  76. The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University (COP). (2007). Corporate philanthropy: The age of integration. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University. Retrieved from http://www.philanthropy.iupui.edu/files/research/corporate_giving_-_july_2007.pdfGoogle Scholar
  77. Thompson, J. D. (2005). Organizations in action. In J. Shafritz, J. Ott, & Y. Jang (Eds.), Classics of organization theory (6th ed., pp. 491–504). Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  78. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Touraine, A. (1977). The self-production of society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  80. United Nations. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Waddock, S. (2004). Parallel Universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 109(1), 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Walsh, J. P., Weber, K., & Margolis, J. D. (2003). Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. Journal of Management, 29(6), 859–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Walton, A., & Gasman, M. (Eds.). (2008). Philanthropy, volunteerism, and fundraising. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  84. Wokutch, R. E., Steiner, J. F., Waddock, S., & Mallott, M. J. (2018). Oral histories of the business and society/SIM field and the SIM Division of the Academy of Management: Origin stories from the founders. Business & Society, 57(8), 1503–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Worth, M. J. (2000). Educational fund raising: Introduction. In P. Buchanan (Ed.), Handbook of institutional advancement (3rd ed., pp. 294–298). Washington, DC: CASE.Google Scholar
  86. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  87. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morgan R. Clevenger
    • 1
  1. 1.Post-doctoral Fellow in Corporate Social Responsibility and Global Business EthicsMonarch Business SchoolZugSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations