Advertisement

Degradation of Emerging Contaminants Using Fe-Doped TiO2 Under UV and Visible Radiation

  • Irwing M. Ramírez-Sánchez
  • Oscar D. Máynez-Navarro
  • Erick R. Bandala
Chapter
Part of the Nanotechnology in the Life Sciences book series (NALIS)

Abstract

The occurrence, fate, and potential hazards of emerging contaminants (ECs) in the environment remains fully known, with unknown potential long-term disastrous consequences for both human health and the environment. These contaminants are being disposed to water bodies and soil without any type of regulation and without the possibility of conventional treatment methods nor natural attenuation to achieve their removal. Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs), particularly photocatalytic processes, have demonstrated to be an interesting alternative to degrade ECs in water. Among the materials used for photocatalytic processes, iron-doped TiO2 (Fe-TiO2) is a promising and versatile photocatalyst with significant features for full-scale application. In this work, we reviewed the mechanisms behind the effect of doping with Fe, the latest studies involving Fe-TiO2 as a photocatalyst in the degradation of ECs, the main trends in the field and identification of current knowledge gaps as well as recommendations for further research direction.

Keywords

Iron doped Photocatalysis Emerging contaminants Visible Solar light 

References

  1. Aba-Guevara CG, Medina-Ramírez IE, Hernández-Ramírez A, Jáuregui-Rincón J, Lozano-Álvarez JA, Rodríguez-López JL (2017) Comparison of two synthesis methods on the preparation of Fe, N-Co-doped TiO2 materials for degradation of pharmaceutical compounds under visible light. Ceram Int 43:5068–5079.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abazović ND, Mirenghi L, Janković IA, Bibić N, Šojić DV, Abramović BF, Čomor MI (2009) Synthesis and characterization of rutile TiO2 nanopowders doped with iron ions. Nanoscale Res Lett 4:518–525.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-009-9274-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Adán C, Bahamonde A, Fernández-García M, Martínez-Arias A (2007) Structure and activity of nanosized iron-doped anatase TiO2catalysts for phenol photocatalytic degradation. Appl Catal B Environ 72:11–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.09.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambrus Z, Balázs N, Alapi T, Wittmann G, Sipos P, Dombi A, Mogyorósi K (2008) Synthesis, structure and photocatalytic properties of Fe(III)-doped TiO2 prepared from TiCl3. Appl Catal B Environ 81:27–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.11.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bansal P, Verma A (2018) In-situ dual effect studies using novel Fe-TiO2 composite for the pilot-plant degradation of pentoxifylline. Chem Eng J 332:682–694.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhatu MN, Lavand AB, Malghe YS (2018) Visible light photocatalytic degradation of malachite green using modified titania. J Mater Res Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2017.05.019
  7. Bouras P, Stathatos E, Lianos P (2007) Pure versus metal-ion-doped nanocrystalline titania for photocatalysis. Appl Catal B Environ 73:51–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler EB, Chen C-C, Hung Y-T, Al Ahmad MS, Fu Y-P (2016) Effect of Fe-doped TiO2 photocatalysts on the degradation of acid orange 7. Integr Ferroelectr 168:1.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10584587.2016.1157779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cai L, Liao X, Shi B (2010) Using collagen fiber as a template to synthesize TiO2 and Fex/TiO2 nanofibers and their catalytic behaviors on the visible light-assisted degradation of orange II. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:3194–3199.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie901520tCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassaignon S, Colbeau-Justin C, Durupthy O (2013) Titanium dioxide in photocatalysis. In: Nanomaterials: a danger or a promise? A chemical and biological perspective. Springer, London, pp 153–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Choi W, Termin A, Hoffmann MR (1994) The role of metal ion dopants in quantum-sized TiO2: correlation between photoreactivity and charge carrier recombination dynamics. J Phys Chem 98:13669–13679.  https://doi.org/10.1021/j100102a038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chong MN, Jin B, Chow CWK, Saint C (2010) Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review. Water Res 44:2997–3027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colombo DP, Bowman RM (1995) Femtosecond diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of TiO2 powders. J Phys Chem 99:11752–11756.  https://doi.org/10.1021/j100030a020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cong Y, Zhang J, Chen F, Anpo M, He D (2007) Preparation, photocatalytic activity, and mechanism of nano-TiO2 co-doped with nitrogen and iron (III). J Phys Chem C 111:10618–10623.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0727493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Das R (2014) Application Photocatalysis for treatment of industrial waste water—a short review. OALib 1:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1100713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delekar SD, Yadav HM, Achary SN, Meena SS, Pawar SH (2012) Structural refinement and photocatalytic activity of Fe-doped anatase TiO2 nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 263:536–545.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Denisov NM, Baglov AV, Borisenko VE (2017) Role of iron and chromium in the photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide films on stainless steel. Inorg Mater 53:176.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168517020030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dulio V, van Bavel B, Brorström-Lundén E, Harmsen J, Hollender J, Schlabach M, Slobodnik J, Thomas K, Koschorreck J (2018) Emerging pollutants in the EU: 10 years of NORMAN in support of environmental policies and regulations. Environ Sci Eur 30:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elghniji K, Atyaoui A, Livraghi S, Bousselmi L, Giamello E, Ksibi M (2012) Synthesis and characterization of Fe3+ doped TiO2 nanoparticles and films and their performance for photocurrent response under UV illumination. J Alloys Compd 541:421–427.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fàbrega C, Andreu T, Cabot A, Morante JR (2010) Location and catalytic role of iron species in TiO2:Fe photocatalysts: an EPR study. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 211:170–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fan W-Q, Bai H-Y, Zhang G-H, Yan Y-S, Liu C-B, Shi W-D (2014) Titanium dioxide macroporous materials doped with iron: synthesis and photo-catalytic properties. CrystEngComm 16:116–122.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CE41627ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fujishima A, Zhang X, Tryk DA (2008) TiO2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena. Surf Sci Rep 63:515–582.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2008.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geissen V, Mol H, Klumpp E, Umlauf G, Nadal M, van der Ploeg M, van de Zee SEATM, Ritsema CJ (2015) Emerging pollutants in the environment: a challenge for water resource management. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 3:57–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghosh AK, Maruska HP (1977) Photoelectrolysis of water in sunlight with sensitized semiconductor electrodes. J Electrochem Soc 124:1516–1522.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2133104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gogoi A, Mazumder P, Tyagi VK, Chaminda GGT, An AK, Kumar M (2018) Occurrence and fate of emerging contaminants in water environment: a review. Groundw Sustain Dev 6:169–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2017.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goswami P, Ganguli JN (2012) Evaluating the potential of a new titania precursor for the synthesis of mesoporous Fe-doped titania with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Mater Res Bull 47:2077–2084.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.03.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamadanian M, Reisi-Vanani A, Behpour M, Esmaeily AS (2011) Synthesis and characterization of Fe,S-codoped TiO2 nanoparticles: application in degradation of organic water pollutants. Desalination 281:319–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hashimoto K, Irie H, Fujishima A (2005) Photocatalysis: a historical overview and future prospects. Jpn J Appl Phys 44:8269–8285.  https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.44.8269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hemmati Borji S, Nasseri S, Mahvi A, Nabizadeh R, Javadi A (2014) Investigation of photocatalytic degradation of phenol by Fe(III)-doped TiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles. J Environ Heal Sci Eng 12:101.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-12-101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Herrmann JM (2005) Heterogeneous photocatalysis: state of the art and present applications. Top Catal 34:49–65.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-005-3788-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson OW, Ohlsen WD, Kingsbury PI (1968) Defects in rutile. III. Optical and electrical properties of impurities and charge carriers. Phys Rev 175:1102–1109.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.175.1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaur T, Sraw A, Wanchoo RK, Toor AP (2016) Visible –light induced photocatalytic degradation of fungicide with Fe and Si doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Mater Today Proc 3:354–361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2016.01.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khang NC, Thanh DM, Van Minh N (2016) Bandgap narrowing of titanium dioxide by Iron doping for enhanced photocatalytic performance of Nanohybrids with CNTs. J Electron Mater 45:5375–5380.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-016-4667-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lezner M, Grabowska E, Zaleska A (2012) Preparation and photocatalytic activity of iron-modified titanium dioxide photocatalyst. Physicochem Probl Miner Process 48:193–200Google Scholar
  35. Li Z, Shen W, He W, Zu X (2008) Effect of Fe-doped TiO2 nanoparticle derived from modified hydrothermal process on the photocatalytic degradation performance on methylene blue. J Hazard Mater 155:590–594.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.095CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Li J, Xu J, Dai WL, Li H, Fan K (2009) Direct hydro-alcohol thermal synthesis of special core-shell structured Fe-doped titania microspheres with extended visible light response and enhanced photoactivity. Appl Catal B Environ 85:162–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li X, Yue P-L, Kutal C (2003) Synthesis and photocatalytic oxidation properties of iron doped titanium dioxide nanosemiconductor particles. New J Chem 27:1264.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b301998eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lin L, Wang H, Jiang W, Mkaouar AR, Xu P (2017) Comparison study on photocatalytic oxidation of pharmaceuticals by TiO2-Fe and TiO2-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites immobilized on optical fibers. J Hazard Mater 333:162–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.02.044CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Litter MI, Navío JA (1996) Photocatalytic properties of iron-doped titania semiconductors. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 98:171–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/1010-6030(96)04343-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu M, Qiu X, Miyauchi M, Hashimoto K (2013) Energy-level matching of Fe(III) ions grafted at surface and doped in bulk for efficient visible-light photocatalysts. J Am Chem Soc 135:10064–10072.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja401541kCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu Y, Wei JH, Xiong R, Pan CX, Shi J (2011) Enhanced visible light photocatalytic properties of Fe-doped TiO2 nanorod clusters and monodispersed nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 257:8121–8126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mandaric L, Celic M, Marcé R, Petrovic M (2016) Introduction on emerging contaminants in Rivers and their environmental risk. In: Petrovic M, Sabater S, Elosegi A, Barceló D (eds) Emerging contaminants in river ecosystems: occurrence and effects under multiple stress conditions. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 3–25Google Scholar
  43. Medina-Ramírez I, Liu JL, Hernández-Ramírez A, Romo-Bernal C, Pedroza-Herrera G, Jáuregui-Rincón J, Gracia-Pinilla MA (2014) Synthesis, characterization, photocatalytic evaluation, and toxicity studies of TiO2–Fe3+ nanocatalyst. J Mater Sci 49:5309–5323.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8234-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Melghit K, Al-Shukeili OS, Al-Amri I (2009) Effect of M-doping (M = Fe, V) on the photocatalytic activity of nanorod rutile TiO2 for Congo red degradation under the sunlight. Ceram Int 35:433–439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2007.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mizushima K, Iida S (1971) Photoconductivity spectra of Fe-doped TiO2. J Phys Soc Jpn 31:950.  https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.31.950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mizushima K, Tanaka M, Iida S (1972) Energy levels of Iron group impurities in TiO2. J Phys Soc Jpn 32:1519–1524.  https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.32.1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Momeni MM, Ahadzadeh I, Rahmati A (2016) Nitrogen, carbon and iron multiple-co doped titanium dioxide nanotubes as a new high-performance photo catalyst. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 27:8646–8653.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-4885-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nahar MS, Hasegawa K, Kagaya S, Kuroda S (2007) Comparative assessment of the efficiency of Fe-doped TiO2 prepared by two doping methods and photocatalytic degradation of phenol in domestic water suspensions. Sci Technol Adv Mater 8:286–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stam.2007.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Naik B, Parida KM (2010) Solar light active photodegradation of phenol over a FexTi1-xO2-yNy nanophotocatalyst. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:8339–8346.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie100889mCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Navıo JA, Colón G, Macıas M, Real C, Litter MII (1999) Iron-doped titania semiconductor powders prepared by a sol-gel method. Part I: synthesis and characterization. Appl Catal A Gen 177:111–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00255-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Navío JA, Testa JJ, Djedjeian P, Padrón JR, Rodríguez D, Litter MI (1999) Iron-doped titania powders prepared by a sol-gel method. Part II: Photocatalytic properties. Appl Catal A Gen 178(2):191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Popa M, Diamandescu L, Vasiliu F, Teodorescu CM, Cosoveanu V, Baia M, Feder M, Baia L, Danciu V (2008) Synthesis, structural characterization, and photocatalytic properties of iron-doped TiO2 aerogels. J Mater Sci 44:358.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-3147-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Radford PP, Francis CG (1983) Photoreduction of nitrogen by metal doped titanium dioxide powders: a novel use for metal vapour techniques. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 24(24):1520–1521.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c39830001520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rodriguez-Narvaez OM, Peralta-Hernandez JM, Goonetilleke A, Bandala ER (2017) Treatment technologies for emerging contaminants in water: a review. Chem Eng J 323:361–380.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schrauzer GN, Guth TD (1977) Photolysis of water and photoreduction of nitrogen on Titanium Dioxide1. J Am Chem Soc 99:7189–7193.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00464a015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Seabra MP, Salvado IMM, Labrincha JA (2011) Pure and (zinc or iron) doped titania powders prepared by sol-gel and used as photocatalyst. Ceram Int 37:3317–3322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.04.127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Serpone N (1997) Relative photonic efficiencies and quantum yields in heterogeneous photocatalysis. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 104:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-6030(96)04538-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shao GN, Jeon SJ, Haider MS, Abbass N, Kim HT (2016) Investigation of the influence of vanadium, iron and nickel dopants on the morphology, and crystal structure and photocatalytic properties of titanium dioxide based nanopowders. J Colloid Interface Sci 474:179–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.04.024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Shi J, Chen G, Zeng G, Chen A, He K, Huang Z, Hu L, Zeng J, Wu J, Liu W (2018) Hydrothermal synthesis of graphene wrapped Fe-doped TiO2 nanospheres with high photocatalysis performance. Ceram Int 44:7473–7480.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shi Z, Zhang X, Yao S (2011) Preparation and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanoparticles co-doped with Fe and La. Particuology 9:260–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2010.05.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sonawane RS, Kale BB, Dongare MK (2004) Preparation and photo-catalytic activity of Fe-TiO2 thin films prepared by sol-gel dip coating. Mater Chem Phys 85:52–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2003.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sui Y, Liu Q, Jiang T, Guo Y (2018) Synthesis of nano-TiO2 photocatalysts with tunable Fe doping concentration from Ti-bearing tailings. Appl Surf Sci 428:1149–1158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tabasideh S, Maleki A, Shahmoradi B, Ghahremani E, McKay G (2017) Sonophotocatalytic degradation of diazinon in aqueous solution using iron-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Sep Purif Technol 189:186–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tong AYC, Braund R, Warren DS, Peake BM (2012) TiO2-assisted photodegradation of pharmaceuticals – a review. Cent Eur J Chem 10:989–1027Google Scholar
  65. Tong T, Zhang J, Tian B, Chen F, He D (2008) Preparation of Fe3+-doped TiO2catalysts by controlled hydrolysis of titanium alkoxide and study on their photocatalytic activity for methyl orange degradation. J Hazard Mater 155:572–579.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Velázquez-Martínez S, Silva-Martínez S, Pineda-Arellano CA, Jiménez-González A, Salgado-Tránsito I, Morales-Pérez AA, Peña-Cruz MI (2018) Modified sol-gel/hydrothermal method for the synthesis of microsized TiO2 and iron-doped TiO2, its characterization and solar photocatalytic activity for an Azo dye degradation. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 359:93–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang C, Böttcher C, Bahnemann DW, Dohrmann JK (2003) A comparative study of nanometer sized Fe(III)-doped TiO2 photocatalysts: synthesis, characterization and activity. J Mater Chem 13:2322.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b303716aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang JA, Limas-Ballesteros R, López T, Moreno A, Gómez R, Novaro O, Bokhimi X (2001) Quantitative determination of titanium lattice defects and solid-state reaction mechanism in iron-doped TiO2 photocatalysts. J Phys Chem B 105:9692–9698.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0044429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wen L, Liu B, Zhao X, Nakata K, Murakami T, Fujishima A (2012) Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalysis of Fe-doped TiO2: a combined experimental and theoretical study. Int J Photoenergy 2012:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/368750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wu Y, Zhang J, Xiao L, Chen F (2009) Preparation and characterization of TiO2 photocatalysts by Fe3+ doping together with Au deposition for the degradation of organic pollutants. Appl Catal B Environ 88:525–532.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Xing M, Wu Y, Zhang J, Chen F (2010) Effect of synergy on the visible light activity of B, N and Fe co-doped TiO2 for the degradation of MO. Nanoscale 2:1233.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00078gCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Yalçın Y, Kılıç M, Çınar Z (2010) Fe+3-doped TiO2: a combined experimental and computational approach to the evaluation of visible light activity. Appl Catal B Environ 99:469–477.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.05.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yamashita H, Harada M, Misaka J, Takeuchi M, Neppolian B, Anpo M (2003) Photocatalytic degradation of organic compounds diluted in water using visible light-responsive metal ion-implanted TiO2catalysts: Fe ion-implanted TiO2. Catal Today 84:191–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yu H, Irie H, Hashimoto K (2010) Conduction band energy level control of titanium dioxide: toward an efficient visible-light-sensitive photocatalyst. J Am Chem Soc 132:6898–6899.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja101714sCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Yu J, Xiang Q, Zhou M (2009) Preparation, characterization and visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity of Fe-doped titania nanorods and first-principles study for electronic structures. Appl Catal B Environ 90:595–602.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.04.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhang Z, Wang C-C, Zakaria R, Ying JY (1998) Role of particle size in nanocrystalline TiO2-based photocatalysts. J Phys Chem B 102:10871–10878.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp982948+CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhao B, Mele G, Pio I, Li J, Palmisano L, Vasapollo G (2010) Degradation of 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) using Fe-TiO2 as a heterogeneous photo-Fenton catalyst. J Hazard Mater 176:569–574.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.066CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhou J, Zhang Y, Zhao XS, Ray AK (2006) Photodegradation of benzoic acid over metal-doped TiO2. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:3503–3511.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie051098zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhu J, Zheng W, He B, Zhang J, Anpo M (2004) Characterization of Fe-TiO2photocatalysts synthesized by hydrothermal method and their photocatalytic reactivity for photodegradation of XRG dye diluted in water. J Mol Catal A Chem 216:35–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2004.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irwing M. Ramírez-Sánchez
    • 1
  • Oscar D. Máynez-Navarro
    • 2
  • Erick R. Bandala
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental EngineeringThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Universidad de las Américas Puebla (UDLAP)CholulaMexico
  3. 3.Desert Research Institute (DRI)Las VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations