This chapter offers a summary of the book. As an exercise in minority biblical criticism, the main goal was to show how dominant readings of Matthew’s passion narrative unveil a certain kind of ethnoracial way of thinking. Through the theoretical lens of deracialization, the pattern of non-ethnoracial readings of ὁ βασιλεὺς τῶν Ἰουδαίων is epiphenomenal in the history of modern biblical scholarship. It is simply one of the many instantiations of the dominant narrative of Christianity as being universal and pitted against ethnoracial particularity. The primary contribution of this book is a critical retrieval of ethnoracial politics in Jesus’ crucifixion. The methodological contribution is an interdisciplinary approach to the study of race/ethnicity in antiquity that draws on ethnoracial theory, minority criticism, and whiteness studies. Ultimately, both aims serve a broader research agenda: to destabilize the dominant narrative of early Christianity’s non-ethnoracial origins.
- Bailey, Randall C., Tat-Siong B. Liew, and Fernando F. Segovia, eds. 2009. They Were All Together in One Place: Toward Minority Biblical Criticism. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
- Carey, Greg. 2013. Introduction and a Proposal: Culture, Power, and Identity in White New Testament Studies. In Soundings in Cultural Criticism: Perspectives and Methods in Culture, Power, and Identity in the New Testament, ed. Francisco Lozada and Greg Carey, 1–13. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
- Cone, James H. 2010. A Black Theology of Liberation. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
- Elizondo, Virgilio P. 2003. A God of Incredible Surprises: Jesus of Galilee. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
- Kelley, Shawn. 2002. Racializing Jesus: Race, Ideology, and the Formation of Modern Biblical Scholarship. London: Routledge.Google Scholar