Advertisement

Competitive Advantage Establishment Through Sustainable Environmental Management and Green Entrepreneurship: A Proposed Differential Equations Framework

  • Michalis Skordoulis
  • Miltiadis Chalikias
  • Spyros Galatsidas
  • Garyfallos Arabatzis
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Earth System Sciences book series (SPRINGEREARTH)

Abstract

Worrying phenomena connected to climate change need to be treated effectively as they can lead to negative consequences in peoples’ lives. At the same time, as businesses are dominant forms of social organization, it can contribute to the forming of the natural environment. This interaction has led businesses to face a set of new challenges concerning environmental management. However, the effective response to these challenges is not just only an obligation for businesses; it can also lead them to the development of a competitive advantage as many researchers state. The aim of this paper is to propose the framework of applying operational research models in the creation of competitive advantage based on green entrepreneurship principles and the sustainable management of the environment. Such mathematical models are based on differential equations and were originally used to predict the outcome of battles. However, the similarity of business competition to battlefields has led to several applications of such models in business cases.

Keywords

Environmental sustainability Competitive advantage Competitive strategy Operations research Green entrepreneurship 

References

  1. Ambec S, Lanoie P (2008) Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Acad Manag Perspect 22(4):45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arabatzis G, Galatsidas S, Intze C, Chalikias M, Tsiantikoudis S, Mamalis S (2015) Green entrepreneurship and green products: consumers’ views and attitudes in regional unit of Evros. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on ICT in Agriculture, Food and Environment (HAICTA 2015). Kavala, September 2015. Athens: HAICTA, pp 291–297Google Scholar
  3. Becker-Olsen L, Cudmore A, Hill P (2006) The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behaviour. J Bus Res 59(1):46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black JA, Boal KB (1994) Strategic resources: traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 15:131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chalikias M, Kalaitzidis I, Karasavvidis G, Pechlivanis EF (2010a) Relationship between sustainable farming and agricultural training: The case of Pella prefecture (Northern Greece). J Food Agric Environ 8(3–4 Part 2):1388–1393Google Scholar
  6. Chalikias M, Kyriakopoulos G, Kolovos KG (2010b) Environmental sustainability and financial feasibility evaluation of wood fuel biomass used for a potential replacement of conventional space heating sources. Part I: A Greek case study. Oper Res 10(1):43–56Google Scholar
  7. Chalikias M, Skordoulis M (2014) Implementation of Richardson’s arms race model in advertising expenditure of two competitive firms. Appl Math Sci 8(81):4013–4023Google Scholar
  8. Chalikias M, Skordoulis M (2016) Implementation of FW Lanchester’s combat model in a supply chain in duopoly: the case of Coca-Cola and Pepsi in Greece. Oper Res Int J 17:737–745.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-016-0226-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chalikias M, Lalou P, Skordoulis M (2016a) Modeling advertising expenditures using differential equations: the case of an oligopoly data set. Int J Appl Math Stat 55(2):23–31Google Scholar
  10. Chalikias M, Lalou P, Skordoulis M (2016b) Modeling a bank data set using differential equations: the case of the Greek banking sector. In: Proceedings of 5th International Symposium and 27th National Conference on Operation Research. Piraeus, June 2016. Piraeus: Hellenic Operation Research Society, pp 113–116Google Scholar
  11. Chaudha A, Jain R, Singh AR, Mishra PK (2011) Integration of Kano’s Model into quality function deployment (QFD). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(5–8):689–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chintagunta PK, Vilcassim NJ (1992) An empirical investigation of advertising strategies in a dynamic duopoly. Manag Sci 38(9):1230–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dangelico RM, Pujari D (2010) Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. J Bus Ethics 95(3):471–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daras, N. (2001). Differential equations and mathematical theories of war. Volume II. Athens: Evelpidon Military Academy.Google Scholar
  15. DesJardins JR (2007) Business, ethics, and the environment: Imagining a sustainable future. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  16. De Souza RG, Clímaco JCN, Sant’ Anna AP, Rocha TB, Do Valle RDAB, Quelhas OLG (2016) Sustainability assessment and prioritisation of e-waste management options in Brazil. Waste Manag 57:46–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erickson, G. (1992) Empirical analysis of closed-loop duopoly advertising strategies. Management Science. 38(12):1732–1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fehlmann T (2008) New Lanchester theory for requirements prioritization. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Software Product Management. Barcelona, September 2008. Bacelona: I.E.E.E, pp 35–40Google Scholar
  19. Figge F, Hahn T, Schaltegger S, Wagner M (2002) The sustainability balanced scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. Bus Strateg Environ 11(5):269–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fruchter G, Kalish S (1997) Closed-loop advertising strategies in a duopoly. Manag Sci 43(1):54–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutchinson C (1992) Corporate strategy and the environment. Long Range Plan 25(4):9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hwarng HB, Teo C (2001) Translating customers’ voices into operations requirements - A QFD application in higher education. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 18(2):195–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jayeola O (2015) The impact of environmental sustainability practice on the financial performance of SMEs: A study of some selected SMEs in Sussex. Int J Bus Manag Econ Res 6(4):214–230Google Scholar
  24. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2005) The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev 83(7):172Google Scholar
  25. King A, Lenox M (2001) Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. J Ind Ecol 5(1):105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kolovos KG, Kyriakopoulos GL, Chalikias M (2011) Co-evaluation of basic wood fuel types used as alternative heating sources to existing energy network. J Environ Prot Ecol 12(2):733–742Google Scholar
  27. Kyriakopoulos G, Kolovos KG, Chalikias MS (2010a) Environmental sustainability and financial feasibility evaluation of wood fuel biomass used for a potential replacement of conventional space heating sources. Part IΙ: A combined Greek and the nearby Balkan Countries case study. Oper Res 10(1):57–69Google Scholar
  28. Kyriakopoulos GL, Kolovos KG, Chalikias M (2010b) Wood fuels prosperity towards a more sustainable energy production. In: World Summit on Knowledge Society: 19–25. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  29. Lam JSL, Lai KH (2015) Developing environmental sustainability by ANP-QFD approach: the case of shipping operations. J Clean Prod 105:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lanchester FW (1916) Aircraft in warfare: the dawn of the fourth arm. Constable Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Lanchester FW (1956) Mathematics in warfare. The World of Mathematics 4:2138–2157Google Scholar
  32. Lawrence L, Andrews D, Ralph B, France C (2002) Identifying and assessing environmental impacts: investigating ISO 14001 approaches. TQM Mag 14(1):43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee SY (2008) Drivers for the participation of small and medium-sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives. Supply Chain Manag Int J 13(3):185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin Y, Cheng HP, Tseng ML, Tsai JC (2010) Using QFD and ANP to analyze the environmental production requirements in linguistic preferences. Expert Syst Appl 37(3):2186–2196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Malesios C, Skouloudis A, Dey PK, Abdelaziz FB, Kantartzis A, Evangelinos K (2018) The impact of SME sustainability practices and performance on economic growth from a managerial perspective: Some modeling considerations and empirical analysis results. Bus Strategy Environ, In PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Melville NP (2010) Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. MIS Q 34(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Naidu N, Badu K, Rajendra G (2007) Operations research: question bank. I.K. International Publishing House, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  38. Nidumolu R, Prahalad CK, Rangaswami MR (2009) Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harv Bus Rev 87(9):56–64Google Scholar
  39. Ntanos S, Kyriakopoulos G, Chalikias M, Arabatzis G, Skordoulis M (2018a) Public perceptions and willingness to pay for renewable energy: a case study from Greece. Sustainability 10(3):687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ntanos S, Kyriakopoulos G, Chalikias M, Arabatzis G, Skordoulis M, Galatsidas S, Drosos D (2018b) Social assessment of renewable energy sources usage and contribution to life quality: the case of an Attica Urban Area in Greece. Sustainability 10(5):1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ntanos A, Skordoulis M, Ntanos S (2014) Greek millennial consumers’ perceptions on organic products. In: Proceedings of eRA-9 International Scientific Conference. Economy II Session. Piraeus, September 2014. Piraeus: T.E.I. of Piraeus, pp 26–35Google Scholar
  42. Ojo E, Mbohwa C, Akinlabi E (2015) Sustainability - competitive advantage? In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Operations Excellence and Service Engineering. Florida, September 2015. Canton, MI: IEOM Society, pp 592–600Google Scholar
  43. Ong TS, Teh BH, Ang YW (2014) The impact of environmental improvements on the financial performance of leading companies listed in Bursa Malaysia. Int J Trade Econ Finance 5(5):386–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Orlitzky M, Siegel DS, Waldman DA (2011) Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business & Society 50(1):6–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ottman JA, Stafford ER, Hartman CL (2006) Green marketing myopia. Environment 48(5):22–36Google Scholar
  46. Oudrihiri R (2005) Six Sigma and DFSS for IT and Software Engineering. The Quarterly Journal of the TickIT Software Quality Certification Scheme 4:7–9Google Scholar
  47. Papageorgiou A, Skordoulis M, Trichias C, Georgakellos D, Koniordos M (2015) Emissions trading scheme: evidence from the European Union countries. In: Kravets et al. (ed) Communications in Computer and Information Science. 535: Proceedings of creativity in intelligent technologies & data science conference, Volgograd, September 2015. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp 222–233Google Scholar
  48. Paucar-Caceres A, Espinosa A (2011) Management science methodologies in environmental management and sustainability: discourses and applications. J Oper Res Soc 62(9):1601–1620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pitman G, Motwani J, Kumar, A, Cheng, CH (1996). QFD application in an educational setting: A pilot field study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 13(4):99–108Google Scholar
  50. Porter M (1980) Competitive strategy. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Porter M (1985) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Porter M (1991) Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strateg Manag J 12:95–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Porter M, Kromer M (2006) Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92Google Scholar
  54. Rohm H, Montgomery D (2010) Link sustainability to corporate strategy using the balanced scorecard. Balanced Scorecard Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  55. Rondinelli D, Vastag G (2000) Panacea, common sense or just a label? The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems. Eur Manag J 18(5):499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sakao T (2007) A QFD-centred design methodology for environmentally conscious product design. Int J Prod Res 45(18–19):4143–4162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sear M (2016) Why loose parts? Their relationship with sustainable practice, children's agency, creative thinking and learning outcomes. Educating Young Children: Learning and Teaching in the Early Childhood Years 22(2):16Google Scholar
  58. Sidiropoulos M, Mouzakitis Y, Adamides E, Goutsos S (2004) Applying sustainable indicators to corporate strategy: the eco-balanced scorecard. Environ Res Eng Manag 1(27):28–33Google Scholar
  59. Sigalas C, Pekka-Economou V, Georgopoulos NB (2013) Developing a measure of competitive advantage. J Strateg Manag 6(4):320–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Skordoulis M, Tsoulfas A, Kornelaki E, Samanta I (2013) The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions on consumers’ behaviour. In: Proceedings of eRA-8 International Scientific Conference. Economy Session. Piraeus, September 2013. Piraeus: T.E.I. of Piraeus, pp 47–58Google Scholar
  61. Skordoulis M, Galatsidas S, Arabatzis G (2017) Business strategies and competitive advantage through green entrepreneurship and sustainable environmental management. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on ICT in Agriculture, Food and Environment (HAICTA 2017). Chania, September 2017. Aachen: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp 205–213Google Scholar
  62. Soerger Zaro E, Soerger Zaro C, Richartz F, Borgert A, Van Bellen HM (2015) The impact of ISO 14001 certification on cost behavior of petrochemical companies listed in the BM&FBOVESPA Stock Exchange. Environ Qual Manag 24(3):57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taoka N (1997) Lanchester strategy: an introduction. Lanchester Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Urip S (2010) CSR strategies for a competitive edge in emerging markets. Wiley, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  65. Wheelen LT, Hunger JD (2012) Strategic management and business policy toward global sustainability, 13th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  66. White L, Lee GJ (2009) Operational research and sustainable development: Tackling the social dimension. Eur J Oper Res 193(3):683–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wu SI, Lin SR (2016) The effect of green marketing strategy on business performance: a study of organic farms in Taiwan. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 27(1–2):141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yazdani M, Hashemkhani Zolfani S, Zavadskas EK (2016) New integration of MCDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers. J Bus Econ Manag 17(6):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang Z, Shon L, Love P, Treloar G (2000) A framework for implementing ISO 14000 in construction. Environ Manag Health 11(2):139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michalis Skordoulis
    • 1
  • Miltiadis Chalikias
    • 2
  • Spyros Galatsidas
    • 1
  • Garyfallos Arabatzis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural ResourcesDemocritus University of ThraceNea OrestiadaGreece
  2. 2.Department of Tourism ManagementUniversity of West AtticaEgaleoGreece

Personalised recommendations