Advertisement

Development and Simulation of Priority Based Control Strategies of Ground Vehicles Movements on the Aerodrome

  • David WeigertEmail author
  • Alina Rettmann
  • Iyad Alomar
  • Juri Tolujew
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 879)

Abstract

Performance indicators to measure delay and delay improvement within the system are the non-operation period of an aircraft, the distance and time by ground vehicles needed to get to their assigned task. Due to the rising number of passengers within the next years, the effectiveness of these indicators needs to rise. A conceptual model was built with the help of Kuhn’s process chain model, which was used as a basis for the following rough calculation. The rough calculation contains time for necessary tasks at an airport as well as data about aircrafts, which departure and arrive at Riga International Airport. This paper focuses on the development and computer simulation of priority based control strategies for improving turnaround times of aircrafts at the apron of the Riga International Airport.

Keywords

Ground vehicle movement Apron simulation Prioritization of vehicles 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the ALLIANCE project (http://alliance-project.eu/) and has been funded within the European Commission’s H2020 Programme under contract number 692426. This paper expresses the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the European Commission. The European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained in this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Vanessa, H.: EUROCONTROL SEVEN - YEAR FORECAST SEPTEMBER 2017: Flight Movements and Service Units 2017–2023. http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/forecasts/seven-year-flights-service-units-forecast-2017-2023-Sep2017.pdf. Accessed 08 Jan 2018
  2. 2.
    RIGA International Airport, Flights | Riga International Airport. http://www.riga-airport.com/en/main/about-company/statistics. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  3. 3.
    RIGA International Airport, Passengers | Riga International Airport. http://www.riga-airport.com/en/main/about-company/statistics/passengers. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  4. 4.
    Pudāns, A.: Riga Airport: Business Plan and Action Plan for 2016–2035. Approved on 18 December 2015. http://www.riga-airport.com/uploads/files/Riga%20Airport%20Business%20Plan%20and%20Action%20Plan%20for%202016-2036.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  5. 5.
    Alomar, I., Tolujevs, J., Medvedevs, A.: Analysis of Riga international airport flight delays (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Silverio, I., Juan, A.A., Arias, P.: A Simulation-Based Approach for Solving the Aircraft Turnaround Problem. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/300447110_A_Simulation-Based_Approach_for_Solving_the_Aircraft_Turnaround_Problem. Accessed 12 Feb 2018
  7. 7.
    Mas, S., Juan, A.A., Arias, P., Fonseca, P.: A simulation study regarding different aircraft boarding strategies. In: van der Aalst, W., et al. (eds.) Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Modeling and Simulation in Engineering, Economics, and Management, pp. 145–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liang, Z., Chaovalitwongse, W.A.: The aircraft maintenance routing problem. In: Chaovalitwongse, W., Furman, K.C., Pardalos, P.M. (eds.) Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Optimization and Logistics Challenges in the Enterprise, pp. 327–348. Springer, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norin, A.: Airport Logistics: Modeling and Optimizing the Turn-Around Process. Department of Science and Technology Linköping University, Norrköping (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu, C., Caves, R.E.: Modelling and optimization of aircraft turnaround time at an airport. Transp. Plan. Technol. 27(1), 47–66 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andreatta, G., de Giovanni, L., Monaci, M.: A fast heuristic for airport ground-service equipment–and–staff allocation. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 108, 26–36 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Herrero, J.G., Berlanga, A., Molina, J.M., Casar, J.R.: Methods for operations planning in airport decision support systems. Appl. Intell. 22(3), 183–206 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schlegel, A.: Bodenabfertigungsprozesse im Luftverkehr: Eine statistische Analyse am Beispiel der Deutschen Lufthansa AG am Flughafen Frankfurt/Main. Zugl.: Göttingen, Georg-August-Univ., Diss. 2010. Gabler Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Airbus S.A.S.: Airbus A320 Aircraft Characteristics: Airport and Maintenance Planning. http://www.aircraft.airbus.com/fileadmin/media_gallery/files/tech_data/AC/Airbus_AC_A320_May17.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2017
  15. 15.
    Ashford, N.J., Stanton, H.P.M., Moore, C.A., Coutu, P., Beasley, J.R.: Airport Operations. The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York (1997–2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuhn, A.: Prozessketten in der Logistik. Verlag Praxiswissen, Dortmund (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Casanova, J.: 737 Aircraft Characteristics for Airport Planning. http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/737.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Weigert
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alina Rettmann
    • 1
  • Iyad Alomar
    • 2
  • Juri Tolujew
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer IFFMagdeburgGermany
  2. 2.Transport and Telecommunication InstituteRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations