Developing a Hypothesis of Multicultural Outcomes: Theory, Case Selection, Methodology and Clarifications

  • Arjun Tremblay
Part of the Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series book series ( CAL)


This chapter provides a sketch of the book’s hypothesis of multiculturalism’s survival and discusses its theoretical underpinnings. It also offers brief summaries of the case selection and comparative methodology used to develop the hypothesis and of the way in which the book operationalizes multiculturalism’s survival. The chapter’s final section provides further clarification about a range of issues such as the benefits and trade-offs of the book’s indicators of multiculturalism survival, the choice to omit cases that might appear to be natural fits for the purposes of multicultural theory building, and the decision to focus on different policy realms across the Canadian, British, and American case studies.


  1. Banting, Keith, and Will Kymlicka. 2010. Canadian Multiculturalism: Global Anxieties and Local Debates. British Journal of Canadian Studies 23 (1): 43–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banting, Keith, and Will Kymlicka. 2013. Is There Really a Retreat from Multiculturalism Policies? New Evidence from the Multiculturalism Policy Index. Comparative European Politics 11 (5): 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banting, Keith, Dick Johnston, Will Kymlicka, and Stuart Soroka. 2006. Do Multiculturalism Policies Erode the Welfare State? An Empirical Analysis. In Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition, Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies, ed. Keith Banting and Will Kymlicka, 49–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergman, Torbjorn. 1993. Formation Rules and Minority Governments. European Journal of Political Research 23 (1): 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloemraad, Irene. 2012. Understanding “Canadian Exceptionalism” in Immigration and Pluralism Policy. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Collier, David. 1993. The Comparative Method. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, ed. Ada W. Finifter. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  7. Critchlow, Donald T. 2009. The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Political History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ditchburn, Jennifer. 2014. Conservatives Tout Traditional Family Values in Message to Party Members. The Globe and Mail, August 26. Accessed October 6, 2016.
  9. Edwards, George C., and Ira Sharkansky. 1978. Policy Predicament: Making and Implementing Public Policy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  10. Entzinger, Han. 2006. The Parallel Decline of Multiculturalism and the Welfare State in the Netherlands. In Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition, Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies, ed. Keith Banting and Will Kymlicka, 177–201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grofman, Bernard. 2001. Introduction. In Political Science as Puzzle Solving, ed. Bernard Grofman, 1–12. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
  12. Hero, Rodney E., and Robert R. Preuhs. 2006. Multiculturalism and Welfare Policies in the USA: A State Level Comparative Analysis. In Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition, Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies, ed. Keith Banting and Will Kymlicka, 121–151. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hershey, Marjorie Randon. 1973. Incumbency and the Minimum Winning Coalition. American Journal of Political Science 17 (3): 631–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howlett, Michael, and M. Ramesh. 2003. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Joppke, Christian. 2004. The Retreat of Multiculturalism in the Liberal State: Theory and Policy. The British Journal of Sociology 55 (2): 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kymlicka, Will. 1996. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Levi, Margaret. 1997. A Model, a Method, and a Map: Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis. In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, ed. Mark Irving Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman, 19–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Levy, Jack S. 2008. Case Studies: Types, Designs and Logics of Inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science 25 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lim, Timothy. 2010. Doing Comparative Politics: An Introduction to Approaches and Issues, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  20. Mahoney, James. 2007. Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics. Comparative Political Studies 40 (2): 122–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. North, Douglass C. 1991. Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prins, Baukje, and Sawitri Saharso. 2010. From Toleration to Repression: The Dutch Backlash Against Multiculturalism. In The Multiculturalism Backlash: European Discourses Policies and Practices, ed. Steven Vertovec and Susanne Wessendorf. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Queens’ University. 2015. Multiculturalism Policy Index. Last Accessed July 22, 2016.
  25. Rattansi, Ali. 2011. Multiculturalism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Riker, William. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Sartori, Giovanni. 1991. Comparing and Miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics 3 (3): 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmitter, Philippe C., and Terry Lynn Karl. 1991. What Democracy Is … and Is Not. Journal of Democracy 2 (3): 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Soroka, Stuart, and Sarah Robertson. 2011. A Literature Review of Public Opinion Research on Canadian Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism and Immigration, 2006–2009. Citizenship and Immigration Canada. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.Google Scholar
  30. Strom, Kaare. 1984. Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies the Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions. Comparative Political Studies 17 (2): 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Strom, Kaare. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Tatalovich, Raymond, and Byron W. Daynes (eds.). 1998. Moral Controversies in American Politics: Cases in Social Regulatory Policies. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  33. Tolley, Erin. 2011. Multiculturalism Policy Index: Immigrant Minority Policies. Paper Prepared for Keith Banting and Will Kymlicka as Part of the Multiculturalism Policy Index Project. School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University.Google Scholar
  34. Tsebelis, George. 1995. Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science 25 (3): 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Tucker, James Thomas. 2006. Enfranchising Language Minority Citizens: The Bilingual Elections Provisions of the Voting Rights Act. Legislation and Public Policy 10: 195–260.Google Scholar
  37. Vergari, Sandra. 2010. Safeguarding Federalism in Education Policy in Canada and the United States. Publius 43 (3): 534–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Whittington, Les. 2013. Conservatives Dismantling Social Programs Built over Generations. The Toronto Star, December 9. Accessed October 6, 2016.
  39. Whitton, Timothy. 2014. Ken Livingstone: The Thorn in (New) Labour’s Side. Revue LISA XII (8). Accessed October 6, 2016.
  40. Winter, Elke. 2010. Trajectories of Multiculturalism in Germany, the Netherlands and Canada. In Search of Common Patterns. Government and Opposition 45 (2): 166–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arjun Tremblay
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ReginaReginaCanada

Personalised recommendations